Literature DB >> 30012695

In Spoken Word Recognition, the Future Predicts the Past.

Laura Gwilliams1,2, Tal Linzen3, David Poeppel4,5, Alec Marantz4,6,2.   

Abstract

Speech is an inherently noisy and ambiguous signal. To fluently derive meaning, a listener must integrate contextual information to guide interpretations of the sensory input. Although many studies have demonstrated the influence of prior context on speech perception, the neural mechanisms supporting the integration of subsequent context remain unknown. Using MEG to record from human auditory cortex, we analyzed responses to spoken words with a varyingly ambiguous onset phoneme, the identity of which is later disambiguated at the lexical uniqueness point. Fifty participants (both male and female) were recruited across two MEG experiments. Our findings suggest that primary auditory cortex is sensitive to phonological ambiguity very early during processing at just 50 ms after onset. Subphonemic detail is preserved in auditory cortex over long timescales and re-evoked at subsequent phoneme positions. Commitments to phonological categories occur in parallel, resolving on the shorter timescale of ∼450 ms. These findings provide evidence that future input determines the perception of earlier speech sounds by maintaining sensory features until they can be integrated with top-down lexical information.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The perception of a speech sound is determined by its surrounding context in the form of words, sentences, and other speech sounds. Often, such contextual information becomes available later than the sensory input. The present study is the first to unveil how the brain uses this subsequent information to aid speech comprehension. Concretely, we found that the auditory system actively maintains the acoustic signal in auditory cortex while concurrently making guesses about the identity of the words being said. Such a processing strategy allows the content of the message to be accessed quickly while also permitting reanalysis of the acoustic signal to minimize parsing mistakes.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/387585-15$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEG; auditory processing; lexical access; speech

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30012695      PMCID: PMC6113903          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity.

Authors:  A M Dale; A K Liu; B R Fischl; R L Buckner; J W Belliveau; J D Lewine; E Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Hemispheric lateralization of the neural encoding of temporal speech features: a whole-head magnetencephalography study.

Authors:  H Ackermann; W Lutzenberger; I Hertrich
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-03

3.  Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream.

Authors:  Iain DeWitt; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Low-Frequency Cortical Entrainment to Speech Reflects Phoneme-Level Processing.

Authors:  Giovanni M Di Liberto; James A O'Sullivan; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds.

Authors:  N Gage; D Poeppel; T P Roberts; G Hickok
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Non-linear processing of a linear speech stream: The influence of morphological structure on the recognition of spoken Arabic words.

Authors:  L Gwilliams; A Marantz
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Sensitivity to morphological composition in spoken word recognition: Evidence from grammatical and lexical identification tasks.

Authors:  Laura E Gwilliams; Philip J Monahan; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments.

Authors:  A P Holmes; R C Blair; J D Watson; I Ford
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Lexical influences on speech perception: a Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates.

Authors:  David W Gow; Jennifer A Segawa; Seppo P Ahlfors; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dynamic EEG analysis during language comprehension reveals interactive cascades between perceptual processing and sentential expectations.

Authors:  McCall E Sarrett; Bob McMurray; Efthymia C Kapnoula
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.

Authors:  Laura Gwilliams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The Encoding of Speech Sounds in the Superior Temporal Gyrus.

Authors:  Han Gyol Yi; Matthew K Leonard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Lexical Influences on Categorical Speech Perception Are Driven by a Temporoparietal Circuit.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Claire Pearson; Ashleigh Harrison
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.420

6.  Greater Early Disambiguating Information for Less-Probable Words: The Lexicon Is Shaped by Incremental Processing.

Authors:  Adam King; Andrew Wedel
Journal:  Open Mind (Camb)       Date:  2020-03

7.  Adaptation to mis-pronounced speech: evidence for a prefrontal-cortex repair mechanism.

Authors:  Esti Blanco-Elorrieta; Laura Gwilliams; Alec Marantz; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise.

Authors:  T M Vanessa Chan; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-08

9.  Maintaining information about speech input during accent adaptation.

Authors:  Zachary Burchill; Linda Liu; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recurrent processes support a cascade of hierarchical decisions.

Authors:  Laura Gwilliams; Jean-Remi King
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.