Literature DB >> 33420193

Adaptation to mis-pronounced speech: evidence for a prefrontal-cortex repair mechanism.

Esti Blanco-Elorrieta1,2,3, Laura Gwilliams4,5,6, Alec Marantz4,7,5, Liina Pylkkänen4,7,5.   

Abstract

Speech is a complex and ambiguous acoustic signal that varies significantly within and across speakers. Despite the processing challenge that such variability poses, humans adapt to systematic variations in pronunciation rapidly. The goal of this study is to uncover the neurobiological bases of the attunement process that enables such fluent comprehension. Twenty-four native English participants listened to words spoken by a "canonical" American speaker and two non-canonical speakers, and performed a word-picture matching task, while magnetoencephalography was recorded. Non-canonical speech was created by including systematic phonological substitutions within the word (e.g. [s] → [sh]). Activity in the auditory cortex (superior temporal gyrus) was greater in response to substituted phonemes, and, critically, this was not attenuated by exposure. By contrast, prefrontal regions showed an interaction between the presence of a substitution and the amount of exposure: activity decreased for canonical speech over time, whereas responses to non-canonical speech remained consistently elevated. Grainger causality analyses further revealed that prefrontal responses serve to modulate activity in auditory regions, suggesting the recruitment of top-down processing to decode non-canonical pronunciations. In sum, our results suggest that the behavioural deficit in processing mispronounced phonemes may be due to a disruption to the typical exchange of information between the prefrontal and auditory cortices as observed for canonical speech.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420193      PMCID: PMC7794353          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79640-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  54 in total

1.  The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production.

Authors:  R S Newman; S A Clouse; J L Burnham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  M W Burton; S L Small; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Karen Taylor; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

5.  The brain dynamics of rapid perceptual adaptation to adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Julia Erb; Molly J Henry; Frank Eisner; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference.

Authors:  Lionel Barnett; Anil K Seth
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Prefrontal connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  T A Hackett; I Stepniewska; J H Kaas
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-01-30       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Low-frequency cortical responses to natural speech reflect probabilistic phonotactics.

Authors:  Giovanni M Di Liberto; Daniel Wong; Gerda Ana Melnik; Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The role of morphology in phoneme prediction: evidence from MEG.

Authors:  Allyson Ettinger; Tal Linzen; Alec Marantz
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke.

Authors:  Jenny Crinion; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.