Literature DB >> 31840591

How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.

Laura Gwilliams1.   

Abstract

Morphemes (e.g. [tune], [-ful], [-ly]) are the basic blocks with which complex meaning is built. Here, I explore the critical role that morpho-syntactic rules play in forming the meaning of morphologically complex words, from two primary standpoints: (i) how semantically rich stem morphemes (e.g. explode, bake, post) combine with syntactic operators (e.g. -ion, -er, -age) to output a semantically predictable result; (ii) how this process can be understood in terms of mathematical operations, easily allowing the brain to generate representations of novel morphemes and comprehend novel words. With these ideas in mind, I offer a model of morphological processing that incorporates semantic and morpho-syntactic operations in service to meaning composition, and discuss how such a model could be implemented in the human brain. This article is part of the theme issue 'Towards mechanistic models of meaning composition'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  morpho-syntax; natural language processing; neurolinguistics; semantic composition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31840591      PMCID: PMC6939360          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  51 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic, and semantic priming.

Authors:  Alberto Domínguez; Manuel de Vega; Horacio Barber
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Morphology and the internal structure of words.

Authors:  Joseph T Devlin; Helen L Jamison; Paul M Matthews; Laura M Gonnerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The neurobiology of semantic memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Laurence White; James F Melhorn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

5.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Binder; David A Medler; Chris F Westbury; Einat Liebenthal; Lori Buchanan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The role of morphology in phoneme prediction: evidence from MEG.

Authors:  Allyson Ettinger; Tal Linzen; Alec Marantz
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  In Spoken Word Recognition, the Future Predicts the Past.

Authors:  Laura Gwilliams; Tal Linzen; David Poeppel; Alec Marantz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Real-time functional architecture of visual word recognition.

Authors:  Caroline Whiting; Yury Shtyrov; William Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification.

Authors:  Simona Amenta; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Modelling meaning composition from formalism to mechanism.

Authors:  Andrea E Martin; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  How Wide the Divide? - Theorizing 'Constructions' in Generative and Usage-Based Frameworks.

Authors:  Matthew T Carlson; Antonio Fábregas; Michael T Putnam
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.