Literature DB >> 30012610

Evolutionary repurposing of a sulfatase: A new Michaelis complex leads to efficient transition state charge offset.

Charlotte M Miton1, Stefanie Jonas1, Gerhard Fischer1, Fernanda Duarte2, Mark F Mohamed1, Bert van Loo1, Bálint Kintses1, Shina C L Kamerlin2, Nobuhiko Tokuriki1,3, Marko Hyvönen1, Florian Hollfelder4.   

Abstract

The recruitment and evolutionary optimization of promiscuous enzymes is key to the rapid adaptation of organisms to changing environments. Our understanding of the precise mechanisms underlying enzyme repurposing is, however, limited: What are the active-site features that enable the molecular recognition of multiple substrates with contrasting catalytic requirements? To gain insights into the molecular determinants of adaptation in promiscuous enzymes, we performed the laboratory evolution of an arylsulfatase to improve its initially weak phenylphosphonate hydrolase activity. The evolutionary trajectory led to a 100,000-fold enhancement of phenylphosphonate hydrolysis, while the native sulfate and promiscuous phosphate mono- and diester hydrolyses were only marginally affected (≤50-fold). Structural, kinetic, and in silico characterizations of the evolutionary intermediates revealed that two key mutations, T50A and M72V, locally reshaped the active site, improving access to the catalytic machinery for the phosphonate. Measured transition state (TS) charge changes along the trajectory suggest the creation of a new Michaelis complex (E•S, enzyme-substrate), with enhanced leaving group stabilization in the TS for the promiscuous phosphonate (βleavinggroup from -1.08 to -0.42). Rather than altering the catalytic machinery, evolutionary repurposing was achieved by fine-tuning the molecular recognition of the phosphonate in the Michaelis complex, and by extension, also in the TS. This molecular scenario constitutes a mechanistic alternative to adaptation solely based on enzyme flexibility and conformational selection. Instead, rapid functional transitions between distinct chemical reactions rely on the high reactivity of permissive active-site architectures that allow multiple substrate binding modes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catalytic promiscuity; directed evolution; enzyme–substrate complementarity; linear free-energy relationship; phosphate transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30012610      PMCID: PMC6077717          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1607817115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  91 in total

Review 1.  Enzymes with extra talents: moonlighting functions and catalytic promiscuity.

Authors:  Shelley D Copley
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  How mutational epistasis impairs predictability in protein evolution and design.

Authors:  Charlotte M Miton; Nobuhiko Tokuriki
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Enzymatic mechanisms of phosphate and sulfate transfer.

Authors:  W Wallace Cleland; Alvan C Hengge
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Efficient catalytic promiscuity for chemically distinct reactions.

Authors:  Ann C Babtie; Subhajit Bandyopadhyay; Luis F Olguin; Florian Hollfelder
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 5.  Expanding the enzyme universe: accessing non-natural reactions by mechanism-guided directed evolution.

Authors:  Hans Renata; Z Jane Wang; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 6.  Efficient, crosswise catalytic promiscuity among enzymes that catalyze phosphoryl transfer.

Authors:  Mark F Mohamed; Florian Hollfelder
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-08-03

Review 7.  Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function.

Authors:  R A Jensen
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 8.  Sulfatases: structure, mechanism, biological activity, inhibition, and synthetic utility.

Authors:  Sarah R Hanson; Michael D Best; Chi-Huey Wong
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Exploring the evolution of novel enzyme functions within structurally defined protein superfamilies.

Authors:  Nicholas Furnham; Ian Sillitoe; Gemma L Holliday; Alison L Cuff; Roman A Laskowski; Christine A Orengo; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Enzyme recruitment and its role in metabolic expansion.

Authors:  Cindy Schulenburg; Brian G Miller
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A mechanistic view of enzyme evolution.

Authors:  Gloria Yang; Charlotte M Miton; Nobuhiko Tokuriki
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Higher-order epistasis shapes the fitness landscape of a xenobiotic-degrading enzyme.

Authors:  Gloria Yang; Dave W Anderson; Florian Baier; Elias Dohmen; Nansook Hong; Paul D Carr; Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin; Colin J Jackson; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Nobuhiko Tokuriki
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 3.  Evolution of new enzymes by gene duplication and divergence.

Authors:  Shelley D Copley
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.622

4.  Mutations Utilize Dynamic Allostery to Confer Resistance in TEM-1 β-lactamase.

Authors:  Tushar Modi; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Cryptic genetic variation shapes the adaptive evolutionary potential of enzymes.

Authors:  Florian Baier; Nansook Hong; Gloria Yang; Anna Pabis; Charlotte M Miton; Alexandre Barrozo; Paul D Carr; Shina Cl Kamerlin; Colin J Jackson; Nobuhiko Tokuriki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Harnessing Conformational Plasticity to Generate Designer Enzymes.

Authors:  Rory M Crean; Jasmine M Gardner; Shina C L Kamerlin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Substrate Dynamics Contribute to Enzymatic Specificity in Human and Bacterial Methionine Adenosyltransferases.

Authors:  Madhuri Gade; Li Lynn Tan; Adam M Damry; Mahakaran Sandhu; Joseph S Brock; Andie Delaney; Alejandro Villar-Briones; Colin J Jackson; Paola Laurino
Journal:  JACS Au       Date:  2021-11-19

8.  Essential Functional Interplay of the Catalytic Groups in Acid Phosphatase.

Authors:  Martin Pfeiffer; Rory M Crean; Catia Moreira; Antonietta Parracino; Gustav Oberdorfer; Lothar Brecker; Friedrich Hammerschmidt; Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 13.084

9.  Structural insights into choline-O-sulfatase reveal the molecular determinants for ligand binding.

Authors:  Jose Antonio Gavira; Ana Cámara-Artigas; Jose Luis Neira; Jesús M Torres de Pinedo; Pilar Sánchez; Esperanza Ortega; Sergio Martinez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.699

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.