| Literature DB >> 30011835 |
Shang Lin1, Huan Guo2, Min Lu3, Ming-Yuan Lu4, Jia Duo Bu Gong5, Lu Wang6, Qing Zhang7, Wen Qin8, Ding-Tao Wu9.
Abstract
β-glucans have been considered the major bioactive components in Qingke (Tibetan hulless barley). However, the structure⁻function relationships of β-glucans from Qingke have seldom been investigated. Whether the bioactivities of Qingke β-glucans are closely correlated to their molecular weights remains unknown. Therefore, in order to explore Qingke β-glucans as functional/healthy food ingredients for industrial applications, and to better understand their structure⁻function relationships, correlations of molecular weights of Qingke β-glucans to their in vitro binding properties, inhibitory activities on digestive enzymes (α-amylase and pancreatic lipase), anti-inflammatory activities, and anticancer activities were systematically investigated. Results showed that the in vitro binding properties and the inhibitory activities on α-amylase and pancreatic lipase of Qingke β-glucans were positively correlated to their molecular weights. However, the anti-inflammatory activities of Qingke β-glucans increased as their molecular weights decreased. Furthermore, Qingke β-glucans exhibited selectively anti-cancer activities in vitro. Positive and negative correlations of molecular weights to inhibitory effects against A549 cells and MDA-MB-231 cells were observed, respectively. However, the inhibitory effects of Qingke β-glucans against HCT116 cells were not associated with their molecular weights. Results suggested that the molecular weights of Qingke β-glucans significantly affected their bioactivities, which was beneficial for a better understanding of their structure⁻function relationships. Moreover, results showed that Qingke β-glucans could be further explored as functional/healthy food ingredients for industrial applications due to their multiple health benefits.Entities:
Keywords: Qingke; anti-cancer activity; anti-inflammatory activity; binding properties; inhibitory activities on digestive enzymes; molecular weight; β-glucans
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30011835 PMCID: PMC6099568 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Molecular weights (M), polydispersities (M/M), intrinsic viscosities ([η]), purities, and proteins of Qingke β-glucans.
| Sample | Molecular Weight (g/mol) | Purity (%) | Protein (%) | [η] (dL/g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.236 (±0.69%) | 1.962 (±0.54%) | 1.59 | 93.8 | 2.15 | 1.86 |
|
| 0.456 (±2.27%) | 0.638 (±2.35%) | 1.40 | 93.1 | 0.72 | 0.98 |
|
| 0.245 (±3.14%) | 0.358 (±2.65%) | 1.46 | 93.3 | 0.49 | 0.58 |
BG, Qingke β-glucan; BGD1, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 10 min; BGD2, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 20 min.
Figure 1Flow diagram of extraction and purification of Qingke β-glucans.
Figure 2HPSEC-RID chromatograms and molecular weights of Qingke β-glucans. BG, Qingke β-glucan; BGD1, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 10 min; BGD2, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 20 min.
The fat-binding, cholesterol-binding, and bile acid-binding capacities of Qingke β-glucans.
| Sample | Fat Binding (g/g) | Cholesterol Binding (mg/g) | Bile Acid Binding (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.23 ± 0.03 a | 40.37 ± 0.43 a | 26.49 ± 0.18 b |
|
| 1.77 ± 0.02 b | 22.68 ± 0.31 b | 23.39 ± 0.22 c |
|
| 1.39 ± 0.02 c | 10.56 ± 0.28 d | 11.54 ± 0.25 d |
|
| 0.89 ± 0.01 d | 18.59 ± 0.18 c | 41.53 ± 0.15 a |
|
| N/A | N/A | 3.81 ± 0.21 e |
BG, Qingke β-glucan; BGD1, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 10 min; BGD2, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 20 min; PC, positive control; NC, negative control; N/A, not available; cellulose was used as a positive control in fat-binding and cholesterol-binding assay, respectively, and cholestyramine and cellulose were used as positive and negative controls in bile acid binding assay; values represent mean ± standard deviation, and different letters (a–e) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3In vitro inhibitory activities of Qingke β-glucans on α-amylase (A) and pancreatic lipase (B). BG, Qingke β-glucan; BGD1, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 10 min; BGD2, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 20 min; the error bars are standard deviations; significant (p < 0.05) differences are shown by data bearing different letters (a–c); statistical significance tests were carried out by ANOVA.
Figure 4Cell viability (A) and NO production (B) of RAW264.7 macrophages treated with Qingke β-glucans. BG, Qingke β-glucan; BGD1, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 10 min; BGD2, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 20 min; The error bars are standard deviations; the differences of cell viability between sample and control are significant at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; the differences of NO production between sample and LPS control group are significant at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; significant (p < 0.05) differences of NO production among BG, BGD1 and BGD2 are shown by data bearing different letters (a–c).
Figure 5In vitro anti-cancer activities of Qingke β-glucans against A549 (A); HCT116 (B); and MDA-MB-231 (C) cells. BG, Qingke β-glucan; BGD1, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 10 min; BGD2, Qingke β-glucan with acid hydrolysis for 20 min; The error bars are standard deviations; the differences of cell viability between sample and control groups are significant at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; significant (p < 0.05) differences of cell viability among BG, BGD1, and BGD2 are shown by data bearing different letters (a–c).