| Literature DB >> 30011802 |
Robert Gerhard Stigler1, Kathrin Becker2, Michela Bruschi3, Doris Steinmüller-Nethl4, Robert Gassner5.
Abstract
By coating surfaces with nano-crystalline diamond (NCD) particles, hydrophilicity can be altered via sidechain modifications without affecting surface texture. The present study aimed to assess the impact of NCD hydrophilicity on machined and rough SLA titanium discs on soft tissue integration, using a rodent model simulating submerged healing. Four different titanium discs (machined titanium = M Titanium, NCD-coated hydrophilic machined titanium = M-O-NCD, sand blasted acid etched (SLA Titanium) titanium, and hydrophilic NCD-coated SLA titanium = SLA O-NCD) were inserted in subdermal pockets of 12 Wistar rats. After one and four weeks of healing, the animals were sacrificed. Biopsies were embedded in methyl methacrylate (MMA), and processed for histology. The number of cells located within a region of interest (ROI) of 10 µm around the discs were counted and compared statistically. Signs of inflammation were evaluated descriptively employing immunohistochemistry. At one week, M-O-NCD coated titanium discs showed significantly higher amounts of cells compared to M Titanium, SLA Titanium, and SLA-O-NCD (p < 0.001). At four weeks, significant higher cell counts were noted at SLA-O-NCD surfaces (p < 0.01). Immunohistochemistry revealed decreased inflammatory responses at hydrophilic surfaces. Within the limits of an animal study, M-O-NCD surfaces seem to stimulate cell proliferation in the initial healing phase, whereas SLA-O-NCD surfaces appeared advantageous afterwards.Entities:
Keywords: cell proliferation; chemical surface modification; hydrophilicitiy; nano-crystalline diamond coating; soft-tissue healing; surface treatment
Year: 2018 PMID: 30011802 PMCID: PMC6070785 DOI: 10.3390/nano8070524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Study design showing the four different surfaces with different levels of roughness (machined versus sand-blasted/acid etched) and different hydrophilicity achieved through additional nano-crystalline diamond coating.
Figure 2Van Giesson staining (A). After 1 week, more cells (black arrows) were seen in proximity to the machined hydrophilic surface compared with the other surfaces. The red scale bar indicates a 10 µm distance. Graph (B) shows the number of cells within a 10 µm distance to the surface after 1 week. Machined hydrophilic surfaces attracted the most cells, but significant differences were also observed between M Titanium and the other groups.
Figure 3Van Giesson staining (A) revealed most cells in proximity to the rough hydrophilic nano-crystalline diamond coated surface. The red scale bar indicates a 10 µm distance. Boxplot (B) shows the descriptive values, and also highlights significant differences through bars.
Figure 4Immunohistochemistry after 1 week. PCNA showed proliferating cells in all samples, especially on the hydrophilic machined surface. The inflammatory protein TNFa was found near the SLA Titanium surface and not near hydrophilic layers. In deeper layers, TNFa expression was seen in all samples, serving as staining control. Fibronectin was mainly expressed on the rough hydrophilic surface. As fibronectin is usually found in vessels, these signals served as staining control. Scale bars indicate 50 µm.
Figure 5Proliferation and near-surface expression of fibronectin was only seen on the SLA-O-NCD titanium plate. Other positive fibronectin signals belong to surrounding vessels. TNFa was upregulated only for the machined titanium surfaces. Scale bars indicate 50 µm distance.