Literature DB >> 10823023

Contact angle measurement on dental implant biomaterials.

T Mekayarajjananonth1, S Winkler.   

Abstract

Wettability may be one of the surface factors to be considered when selecting dental implant biomaterials. Contact angles of dental implant surface preparations influence wettability and tissue adhesion. The contact angles of eight implant surface preparations were determined in this study. Contact angles were measured by a tele-microscope equipped with a protractor eyepiece. Groups 1 to 6 had a Ti6Al4V substrate. Group 1 was metallurgically polished, group 2 was blasted with 180 microns Al2O3, group 3 was blasted with 710 microns Al2O3, group 4 was hydroxyapatite (HA) blasted (125 microns), group 5 had a Calcitite HA plasma-sprayed coating, and group 6 was coated with plasma-sprayed MP-1 HA. Group 7 was metallurgically polished commercially pure (CP) titanium (grade 1), and group 8 was etched CP titanium (grade 1). Contact angles were measured 30 times for each group with distilled water and glycerol, and the determinations were statistically analyzed. Mean contact angles for groups 1 to 8 were 65.5, 65.3, 62.5, 67.9, 46.6, 81.7, 58.5, and 69.0, respectively, when tested with distilled water, and 70.7, 68.3, 81.6, 75.4, 67.1, 70.7, 62.3, and 82.5, respectively, when tested with glycerol. Analysis of variance and Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference test (p = 0.05) demonstrated significant differences between group 5 and all other groups when groups were tested with distilled water and demonstrated no significant differences between groups 5 and 7 when groups were tested with glycerol. Surface preparation of implant biomaterials affects wettability. In this study, Ti6Al4V coated with Calcitite HA had the lowest contact angles and the best wettability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10823023     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(1999)025<0230:CAMODI>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  4 in total

1.  Osteoblastic cell response on high-rough titanium coatings by cold spray.

Authors:  A M Vilardell; N Cinca; N Garcia-Giralt; S Dosta; I G Cano; X Nogués; J M Guilemany
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The effect of exposed glass fibers and particles of bioactive glass on the surface wettability of composite implants.

Authors:  Aous A Abdulmajeed; Lippo V Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Närhi
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2011-12-27

3.  Impact of Nano-Crystalline Diamond Enhanced Hydrophilicity on Cell Proliferation on Machined and SLA Titanium Surfaces: An In-Vivo Study in Rodents.

Authors:  Robert Gerhard Stigler; Kathrin Becker; Michela Bruschi; Doris Steinmüller-Nethl; Robert Gassner
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  A histomorphometric study on treated and untreated ceramic filled PEEK implants versus titanium implants: Preclinical in vivo study.

Authors:  Tarek A El Awadly; Gang Wu; Mohamed Ayad; Iman A W Radi; Daniel Wismeijer; Hamdy Abo El Fetouh; Reham B Osman
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.977

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.