Literature DB >> 30003997

Early Changes in Serial CBCT-Measured Parotid Gland Biomarkers Predict Chronic Xerostomia After Head and Neck Radiation Therapy.

Benjamin S Rosen1, Peter G Hawkins2, Daniel F Polan2, James M Balter2, Kristy K Brock3, Justin D Kamp2, Christina M Lockhart2, Avraham Eisbruch2, Michelle L Mierzwa2, Randall K Ten Haken2, Issam El Naqa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether serial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images taken during head and neck radiation therapy (HNR) can improve chronic xerostomia prediction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a retrospective analysis, parotid glands (PGs) were delineated on daily kV CBCT images using deformable image registration for 119 HNR patients (60 or 70 Gy in 2 Gy fractions over 6 or 7 weeks). Deformable image registration accuracy for a subset of deformed contours was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to agreement in comparison with manually drawn contours. Average weekly changes in CBCT-measured mean Hounsfield unit intensity and volume were calculated for each PG relative to week 1. Dose-volume histogram statistics were extracted from each plan, and interactions among dose, volume, and intensity were investigated. Univariable analysis and penalized logistic regression were used to analyze association with observer-rated xerostomia at 1 year after HNR. Models including CBCT delta imaging features were compared with clinical and dose-volume histogram-only models using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for grade ≥1 and grade ≥2 xerostomia prediction.
RESULTS: All patients experienced end-treatment PG volume reduction with mean (range) ipsilateral and contralateral PG shrinkage of 19.6% (0.9%-58.4%) and 17.7% (4.4%-56.3%), respectively. Midtreatment volume change was highly correlated with mean PG dose (r = -0.318, P < 1e-6). Incidence of grade ≥1 and grade ≥2 xerostomia was 65% and 16%, respectively. For grade ≥1 xerostomia prediction, the delta-imaging model had an AUC of 0.719 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.603-0.830), compared with 0.709 (95% CI, 0.603-0.815) for the dose/clinical model. For grade ≥2 xerostomia prediction, the dose/clinical model had an AUC of 0.692 (95% CI, 0.615-0.770), and the addition of contralateral PG changes modestly improved predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.776 (0.643-0.912).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of CBCT-measured PG image feature changes improves prediction over dose alone for chronic xerostomia prediction. Analysis of CBCT images acquired for treatment positioning may provide an inexpensive monitoring system to support toxicity-reducing adaptive radiation therapy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30003997      PMCID: PMC6411287          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  58 in total

1.  Feasibility study of a synchronized-moving-grid (SMOG) system to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Authors:  Lei Ren; Fang-Fang Yin; Indrin J Chetty; David A Jaffray; Jian-Yue Jin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dose-volume modeling of salivary function in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy.

Authors:  Angel I Blanco; K S Clifford Chao; Issam El Naqa; Gregg E Franklin; Konstantin Zakarian; Milos Vicic; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Density variation of parotid glands during IMRT for head-neck cancer: correlation with treatment and anatomical parameters.

Authors:  Claudio Fiorino; Giovanna Rizzo; Elisa Scalco; Sara Broggi; Maria Luisa Belli; Italo Dell'Oca; Nicola Dinapoli; Francesco Ricchetti; Aldo Mejia Rodriguez; Nadia Di Muzio; Riccardo Calandrino; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Vincenzo Valentini; Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Accuracy of software-assisted contour propagation from planning CT to cone beam CT in head and neck radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christian A Hvid; Ulrik V Elstrøm; Kenneth Jensen; Markus Alber; Cai Grau
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Grading xerostomia by physicians or by patients after intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Amichay Meirovitz; Carol Anne Murdoch-Kinch; Mathew Schipper; Charlie Pan; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Long-term quality of life after treatment for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma: surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiation.

Authors:  Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Marco Stellin; Roberto Fuson; Carlo Marchiori; Alessandro Gava; Maria Cristina Da Mosto
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  Patient-specific scatter correction in clinical cone beam computed tomography imaging made possible by the combination of Monte Carlo simulations and a ray tracing algorithm.

Authors:  Rune S Thing; Uffe Bernchou; Ernesto Mainegra-Hing; Carsten Brink
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Radiation-induced xerostomia: objective evaluation of salivary gland injury using MR sialography.

Authors:  A Wada; N Uchida; M Yokokawa; T Yoshizako; H Kitagaki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  IMRT for head and neck cancer: reducing xerostomia and dysphagia.

Authors:  XiaoShen Wang; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Delivered dose can be a better predictor of rectal toxicity than planned dose in prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  L E A Shelley; J E Scaife; M Romanchikova; K Harrison; J R Forman; A M Bates; D J Noble; R Jena; M A Parker; M P F Sutcliffe; S J Thomas; N G Burnet
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  12 in total

1.  A Deep Learning Model for Predicting Xerostomia Due to Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the RTOG 0522 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kuo Men; Huaizhi Geng; Haoyu Zhong; Yong Fan; Alexander Lin; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Imaging for Response Assessment in Radiation Oncology: Current and Emerging Techniques.

Authors:  Sonja Stieb; Kendall Kiser; Lisanne van Dijk; Nadia Roxanne Livingstone; Hesham Elhalawani; Baher Elgohari; Brigid McDonald; Juan Ventura; Abdallah Sherif Radwan Mohamed; Clifton David Fuller
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.722

3.  Dynamic stochastic deep learning approaches for predicting geometric changes in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Julia M Pakela; Martha M Matuszak; Randall K Ten Haken; Daniel L McShan; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Transfer learning approach based on computed tomography images for predicting late xerostomia after radiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Annarita Fanizzi; Giovanni Scognamillo; Alessandra Nestola; Santa Bambace; Samantha Bove; Maria Colomba Comes; Cristian Cristofaro; Vittorio Didonna; Alessia Di Rito; Angelo Errico; Loredana Palermo; Pasquale Tamborra; Michele Troiano; Salvatore Parisi; Rossella Villani; Alfredo Zito; Marco Lioce; Raffaella Massafra
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-23

5.  Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of a Decision-Support Software for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sebastien A A Gros; Anand P Santhanam; Alec M Block; Bahman Emami; Brian H Lee; Cara Joyce
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Early prediction of acute xerostomia during radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer based on delta radiomics from CT images.

Authors:  Yanxia Liu; Hongyu Shi; Sijuan Huang; Xiaochuan Chen; Huimin Zhou; Hui Chang; Yunfei Xia; Guohua Wang; Xin Yang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-07

7.  Predicting late radiation-induced xerostomia with parotid gland PET biomarkers and dose metrics.

Authors:  Joel R Wilkie; Michelle L Mierzwa; Keith A Casper; Charles S Mayo; Matthew J Schipper; Avraham Eisbruch; Francis P Worden; Issam El Naqa; Benjamin L Viglianti; Benjamin S Rosen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Longitudinal radiomics of cone-beam CT images from non-small cell lung cancer patients: Evaluation of the added prognostic value for overall survival and locoregional recurrence.

Authors:  Janna E van Timmeren; Wouter van Elmpt; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Bart Reymen; René Monshouwer; Johan Bussink; Leen Paelinck; Evelien Bogaert; Carlos De Wagter; Elamin Elhaseen; Yolande Lievens; Olfred Hansen; Carsten Brink; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Reproducibility and Repeatability of CBCT-Derived Radiomics Features.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Yongkang Zhou; Xiao Wang; Yin Zhang; Chi Ma; Bo Liu; Qing Kong; Ning Yue; Zhiyong Xu; Ke Nie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Cone-beam CT radiomics features might improve the prediction of lung toxicity after SBRT in stage I NSCLC patients.

Authors:  Qingjin Qin; Anhui Shi; Ran Zhang; Qiang Wen; Tianye Niu; Jinhu Chen; Qingtao Qiu; Yidong Wan; Xiaorong Sun; Ligang Xing
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.