Literature DB >> 34587597

Dynamic stochastic deep learning approaches for predicting geometric changes in head and neck cancer.

Julia M Pakela1,2, Martha M Matuszak2, Randall K Ten Haken2, Daniel L McShan2, Issam El Naqa1,2.   

Abstract

Objective.Modern radiotherapy stands to benefit from the ability to efficiently adapt plans during treatment in response to setup and geometric variations such as those caused by internal organ deformation or tumor shrinkage. A promising strategy is to develop a framework, which given an initial state defined by patient-attributes, can predict future states based on pre-learned patterns from a well-defined patient population.Approach.Here, we investigate the feasibility of predicting patient anatomical changes, defined as a joint state of volume and daily setup changes, across a fractionated treatment schedule using two approaches. The first is based on a new joint framework employing quantum mechanics in combination with deep recurrent neural networks, denoted QRNN. The second approach is developed based on a classical framework, which models patient changes as a Markov process, denoted MRNN. We evaluated the performance characteristics of these two approaches on a dataset of 125 head and neck cancer patients, which was supplemented by synthetic data generated using a generative adversarial network. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) scores.Main results.The MRNN framework had slightly better performance than the QRNN framework, with MRNN (QRNN) validation AUC scores of 0.742±0.021 (0.675±0.036), 0.709±0.026 (0.656±0.021), 0.724±0.036 (0.652±0.044), and 0.698±0.016 (0.605±0.035) for system state vector sizes of 4, 6, 8, and 10, respectively. Of these, only the results from the two higher order states had statistically significant differences(p<0.05).A similar trend was also observed when the models were applied to an external testing dataset of 20 patients, yielding MRNN (QRNN) AUC scores of 0.707 (0.623), 0.687 (0.608), 0.723 (0.669), and 0.697 (0.609) for states vectors sizes of 4, 6, 8, and 10, respectively.Significance.These results suggest that both stochastic models have potential value in predicting patient changes during the course of adaptive radiotherapy.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov process; adaptive radiotherapy; deep learning; head and neck cancer; quantum computing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34587597      PMCID: PMC8637428          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac2b80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  25 in total

Review 1.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  IMRT: a review and preview.

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Adaptive radiation therapy: technical components and clinical applications.

Authors:  Qingrong Jackie Wu; Taoran Li; Qiuwen Wu; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 4.  Adaptive Radiotherapy for Anatomical Changes.

Authors:  Jan-Jakob Sonke; Marianne Aznar; Coen Rasch
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 5.  Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Stephanie Lim-Reinders; Brian M Keller; Shahad Al-Ward; Arjun Sahgal; Anthony Kim
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Human papillomavirus positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: a radiosensitive subgroup of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  K Lindel; K T Beer; J Laissue; R H Greiner; D M Aebersold
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Toward predicting the evolution of lung tumors during radiotherapy observed on a longitudinal MR imaging study via a deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Chuang Wang; Andreas Rimner; Yu-Chi Hu; Neelam Tyagi; Jue Jiang; Ellen Yorke; Sadegh Riyahi; Gig Mageras; Joseph O Deasy; Pengpeng Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Estimation of setup uncertainty using planar and MVCT imaging for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Lakshmi Santanam; Jacqueline Esthappan; Sasa Mutic; Eric E Klein; S Murty Goddu; Summer Chaudhari; Sasha Wahab; Issam M El Naqa; Daniel A Low; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Introduction to machine and deep learning for medical physicists.

Authors:  Sunan Cui; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Julia Pakela; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Radiomics strategies for risk assessment of tumour failure in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Martin Vallières; Emily Kay-Rivest; Léo Jean Perrin; Xavier Liem; Christophe Furstoss; Hugo J W L Aerts; Nader Khaouam; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; Chang-Shu Wang; Khalil Sultanem; Jan Seuntjens; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.