Joel R Wilkie1, Michelle L Mierzwa2, Keith A Casper3, Charles S Mayo2, Matthew J Schipper4, Avraham Eisbruch2, Francis P Worden5, Issam El Naqa2, Benjamin L Viglianti6, Benjamin S Rosen2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States. Electronic address: jwilkie@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States. 3. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States. 6. Nuclear Medicine Service, Ann Arbor Veteran's Administration, United States; Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Division, Ann Arbor, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess associations between parotid gland PET biomarkers and late radiation-induced xerostomia, and to validate improvement of xerostomia predictive models by adding pre-treatment PET features to models based on dose and pre-treatment xerostomia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intensity PET features from 47 patients treated on institutional prospective clinical trials for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with uniform chemoRT were analyzed. Associations between 90th percentile of the parotid gland standardized uptake values (P90) from pre-treatment and post-treatment PET scans, mean parotid gland doses, and late xerostomia defined by the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ) and salivary flow rates were quantified. Multivariable analysis was applied for dose and PET features using penalized logistic regression for feature selection and generation of predictive models using the LASSO technique, and optimism bias was estimated by bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: Significant associations between late xerostomia and both mean parotid gland dose and P90 were demonstrated, and were generally stronger for post-treatment PET scans. The addition of P90 from pre-treatment PET scans improved the prediction model for late moderate or severe xerostomia compared to the base model, from AUC = 0.74 to 0.78 (p-value <0.001) for XQ summary score and from 0.77 to 0.84 (p-value <0.001) for the single eating-related XQ item with the largest inter-patient variability; however, only the latter remained significant on cross validation (AUC = 0.69 to 0.70 and 0.73 to 0.80, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of pre-treatment parotid gland PET biomarkers improved a predictive model for late patient-reported xerostomia over dose and pre-treatment xerostomia.
PURPOSE: To assess associations between parotid gland PET biomarkers and late radiation-induced xerostomia, and to validate improvement of xerostomia predictive models by adding pre-treatment PET features to models based on dose and pre-treatment xerostomia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intensity PET features from 47 patients treated on institutional prospective clinical trials for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with uniform chemoRT were analyzed. Associations between 90th percentile of the parotid gland standardized uptake values (P90) from pre-treatment and post-treatment PET scans, mean parotid gland doses, and late xerostomia defined by the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ) and salivary flow rates were quantified. Multivariable analysis was applied for dose and PET features using penalized logistic regression for feature selection and generation of predictive models using the LASSO technique, and optimism bias was estimated by bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: Significant associations between late xerostomia and both mean parotid gland dose and P90 were demonstrated, and were generally stronger for post-treatment PET scans. The addition of P90 from pre-treatment PET scans improved the prediction model for late moderate or severe xerostomia compared to the base model, from AUC = 0.74 to 0.78 (p-value <0.001) for XQ summary score and from 0.77 to 0.84 (p-value <0.001) for the single eating-related XQ item with the largest inter-patient variability; however, only the latter remained significant on cross validation (AUC = 0.69 to 0.70 and 0.73 to 0.80, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of pre-treatment parotid gland PET biomarkers improved a predictive model for late patient-reported xerostomia over dose and pre-treatment xerostomia.
Authors: Michael C Roach; Timothy G Turkington; Kristin A Higgins; Thomas C Hawk; Jenny K Hoang; David M Brizel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Eisbruch; J A Ship; M K Martel; R K Ten Haken; L H Marsh; G T Wolf; R M Esclamado; C R Bradford; J E Terrell; S S Gebarski; A S Lichter Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1996-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Barbara Bussels; Annelies Maes; Patrick Flamen; Philippe Lambin; Katrien Erven; Robert Hermans; Sandra Nuyts; Caroline Weltens; Silvia Cecere; Emmanuel Lesaffre; Walter Van den Bogaert Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Ivo Beetz; Cornelis Schilstra; Arjen van der Schaaf; Edwin R van den Heuvel; Patricia Doornaert; Peter van Luijk; Arjan Vissink; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Charles R Leemans; Henk P Bijl; Miranda E M C Christianen; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Laurien M Buffart; Martijn W Heymans; Derek H Rietveld; Patricia Doornaert; Remco de Bree; Jan Buter; Neil K Aaronson; Ben J Slotman; C René Leemans; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Antonetta C Houweling; Marielle E P Philippens; Tim Dijkema; Judith M Roesink; Chris H J Terhaard; Cornelis Schilstra; Randall K Ten Haken; Avraham Eisbruch; Cornelis P J Raaijmakers Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lisanne V van Dijk; Charlotte L Brouwer; Arjen van der Schaaf; Johannes G M Burgerhof; Roelof J Beukinga; Johannes A Langendijk; Nanna M Sijtsema; Roel J H M Steenbakkers Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Benjamin S Rosen; Peter G Hawkins; Daniel F Polan; James M Balter; Kristy K Brock; Justin D Kamp; Christina M Lockhart; Avraham Eisbruch; Michelle L Mierzwa; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 7.038