Literature DB >> 30002891

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 2,4-di-amino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ium tri-chloro-acetate monohydrate.

Ramalingam Sangeetha1, Kasthuri Balasubramani1, Kaliyaperumal Thanigaimani2, Savaridasson Jose Kavitha3.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title mol-ecular salt, C4H8N5+·C2Cl3O2-·H2O, coomprises a 2,4-di-amino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ium cation, a tri-chloro-acetate anion and a water mol-ecule of solvation. The protonated N atom of the cation forms a hydrogen bond with a carboxyl O atom of the anion, which also acts as a hydrogen-atom acceptor with the water mol-ecule. The cations form centrosymmetric dimeric units through R22(8) N-H⋯N bond pairs and are extended into zigzag chains along the c-axis direction, also through similar cyclic R22(8) dual N-H⋯N hydrogen-bonding inter-actions. The water mol-ecule acts as a dual acceptor forming N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the amine groups of the cations, forming cyclic R23(8) motifs. The second H atom of the water mol-ecule also acts as a donor in an O-H⋯O hydrogen bond with the second carboxyl O atom, linking the chains along the b-axis direction. These interactions give rise to an overall three-dimensional supra-molecular structure. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was employed in order to study the inter-molecular inter-actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; crystal structure; three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded supra­molecular framework; triazinium cation; tri­chloro­acetate anion

Year:  2018        PMID: 30002891      PMCID: PMC6038629          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018008307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Triazine heterocyclic π-conjugated structures are attractive owing to the chemical flexiblity of their systems and have many applications in medicinal chemistry, materials science and organic synthesis (Boesveld & Lappert, 1997 ▸; Boesveld et al., 1999 ▸; Reid et al., 2011 ▸). 1,3,5-Triazine derivatives represent an important class of compounds because of their potential to be biologically active. They are known to be anti-protozoal agents (Baliani et al., 2005 ▸), anti­cancer agents (Menicagli et al., 2004 ▸), estrogen receptor modulators (Henke et al., 2002 ▸), anti-malarials (Agarwal et al., 2005 ▸), cyclin-dependent kinase modulators (Kuo et al., 2005 ▸) and anti-microbial agents (Koc et al., 2010 ▸). These compounds still continue to be the object of considerable inter­est mainly because of their applications in various fields, including the production of herbicides and polymer photostabilizers. Triazine derivatives have been used as building blocks for subtle chemical architectures comprising organic–inorganic hybrid frameworks (Ma­thias et al., 1994 ▸; Zerkowski & Whitesides, 1994 ▸; MacDonald & Whitesides, 1994 ▸; Guru Row, 1999 ▸; Krische & Lehn, 2000 ▸; Sherrington & Taskinen, 2001 ▸). In these approaches, interplay between mol­ecules is achieved by using diverse styles of non-covalent inter­actions, which include hydrogen bonds or ionic, hydro­phobic, van der Waals or dispersive forces. Herein, the crystal structure of the title compound salt, 2,4-di­amino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-5-ium tri­chloro­acetate monohydrate is reported. Hirshfeld surface analysis and 2D fingerprint plots were employed in order to qu­antify the contributions of the various inter­molecular inter­actions present in the structure.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure with atomic numbering scheme is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The asymmetric unit comprises a 2,4-di­amino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-5-ium cation, a tri­chloro­acetate anion and a water mol­ecule of solvation (O1W). Proton transfer occurs from one of the carb­oxy­lic acid oxygen atoms (O1) to atom N5 of the cation, with a resulting N5—H1N5⋯O1 hydrogen bond [2.652 (3) Å, Table 1 ▸]. The water mol­ecule is also hydrogen bonded to atom O1 [2.835 (3) Å]. The proton transfer to the cation results in a widening of the C3—N5—C2 bond angle of the triazinium ring to 119.06 (19)°, compared to the comparative angle found in neutral 2,4-di­amino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine [114.4 (7)°; Aoki et al., 1994 ▸]. The C—O bond distances within the carboxyl group of the tri­chloro­acetate anion are 1.212 (3) and 1.251 (3) Å.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure and atom-numbering scheme for the title salt, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 40% probability level.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N5—H1N5⋯O1i 0.861.792.652 (3)178
N2—H1N2⋯O1W ii 0.862.032.886 (3)174
N2—H2N2⋯N1iii 0.862.213.071 (3)174
N4—H2N4⋯N3iv 0.862.183.034 (3)173
N4—H1N4⋯O1W v 0.862.222.834 (3)128
O1W—H1O1⋯O10.86 (4)1.97 (4)2.835 (3)176 (3)
O1W—H2O2⋯O2vi 0.78 (4)1.97 (4)2.741 (3)173 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) .

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, pairs of 2,4-di­amino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-5-ium cations associate through lateral centrosymmetric inter­actions via N2—H2N2⋯N1iii and N4—H2N4⋯N3iv hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) with cyclic (8) graph-set motifs. These inter­actions result in the formation of zigzag chains extending along the c-axis direction (Fig. 2 ▸). The cations in the chains are further linked through amine N2—H1N2O1W ii and N4—H1N4O1W v hydrogen bonds in (8) motifs (Fig. 3 ▸), producing a complementary DADA (D = donor and A = acceptor) hydrogen-bonded array with an (8), (8), (8) graph-set motif sequence (Fig. 3 ▸). The water mol­ecule acts as a donor to form a second O1WH2O2⋯O2vi hydrogen bond, which together with the O1W—H1O1⋯O1 hydrogen-bond sequence links the tri­chloro­acetate anions into chains along the b-axis direction. Overall, a three-dimensional supra­molecular structure is generated (Fig. 4 ▸).
Figure 2

A packing view showing the centrosymmetric N—H⋯N hydrogen-bonded cation pairs with TCA anions, extending into chains along the c-axis direction. Water mol­ecules are omitted.

Figure 3

Another view of the extended chains with the TCA anions omitted, showing the DADA array and the participation of the water mol­ecules in hydrogen bonding.

Figure 4

An overall view of the three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded supra­molecular structure.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

Hirshfeld surface analysis (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ▸) and 2D fingerprint plots are useful tools for describing the surface characteristics of the crystal structure and were generated using CrystalExplorer 3.0 (Wolff et al., 2012 ▸). The normalized contact distance (d norm) is based on the distances from the nearest atom inside (d i) and outside (d e) the surface. The 3D d norm surface of the title compound is shown in Fig. 5 ▸. The red points represent closer contacts and negative d norm values on the surface corresponding to the N—H⋯O, N—H⋯N and O—H⋯O inter­actions. Two-dimensional fingerprint plots are shown in Fig. 6 ▸. H⋯H inter­actions (24.5%) are present as a major contributor while H⋯O/O⋯H (22.9%), N⋯H/H⋯N (10.2%), H⋯Cl (15.1%) N⋯H (10.2%), N⋯Cl (8.0%), C⋯Cl (5.6%), C⋯H (2.6%), Cl⋯O (2.4%), CN (1.6%) and CC (0.2%) contacts also make significant contributions to the Hirshfeld surface.
Figure 5

The three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title compound

Figure 6

Two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the title compound

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.37, update February 2016; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for 2,4-di­amino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine yielded 22 structures of proton-transfer salts with carb­oxy­lic acids: AZUYUQ (with tetra­fluoro­boric acid; Gomathi & Mu­thiah, 2011 ▸); CICZUK (with tri­fluoro­acetic acid; Perpétuo & Janczak, 2007 ▸); GIMRIE (with hydrogen chloride; Portalone & Colapietro, 2007 ▸); KUSQEV (with hydrogen chloride; Qian & Huang, 2010 ▸); LUGGEB (with 3,5-di­hydroxy­benzoic acid; Xiao et al., 2014 ▸); NAGLIR (with dimesyl­amide; Wijaya et al., 2004 ▸); QUWXAI (with 2-carb­oxy­benzoic acid), QUWXEM [with (Z)-2-carb­oxy­ethene-1-carb­oxy­lic acid] and QUWXIQ (with 3-hy­droxy­pyridine-2-carb­oxy­lic acid) (Thanigaimani et al., 2010 ▸); ROGPIN [with oxalic acid (methanol clathrate)], ROGPOT [with malonic acid (tetra­hydrate clathrate)], ROGPUZ [with succinic acid (clathrate)], ROGQAG [with acetyl­enedi­carb­oxy­lic acid (monohydrate clathrate)], ROGQEK [glutaric acid (clathrate)], ROGQIO [thio­diglycolic acid(clathrate)], ROGQOU [diglycolic acid (monohydrate clathrate)], ROMZOJ [fumaric acid (clathrate)] (Delori et al., 2008 ▸); SOLTIX (with nitric acid; Fan et al., 2009 ▸); YODCAX (with 2,3,5,6-tetra­fluoro­terephthalic acid; Wang et al., 2014 ▸); ZAQJEI (with oxalic acid; Narimani & Yamin, 2012 ▸); ZUDSOI [with 6-chloro­uracil-1-ide (N,N-di­methyl­acetamide solvate)], ZUDSUO [with 6-chloro­uracil-1-ide (N,N-di­methyl­formamide solvate monohydrate)] (Gerhardt & Egert, 2015 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was prepared by mixing a hot methano­lic solution (20 ml) of 2,4-di­amino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine (1.25 mg) and an aqueous solution (10 ml) of tri­chloro­acetic acid (1.63 mg) in a 1:1 molar ratio. The reaction mixture was warmed over a water bath for a few minutes. The resultant solution was then allowed to cool slowly at room temperature. After a few days, colourless block-shaped crystals of the title compound were separated out.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The C- and N-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and were included in the refinement in the riding-model approximation with C—H = 0.96 Å and N—H = 0.86 Å (NH, NH2), with U iso(H) set to 1.2U eq(C,N). The water-bound H atoms were located in a difference-Fourier map and were freely refined [O—H = 0.78 (4) and 0.86 (4) Å].
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC4H8N5 +·C2Cl3O2 ·H2O
M r 306.54
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)21.7056 (18), 11.9074 (9), 10.9562 (6)
β (°)119.084 (5)
V3)2474.7 (3)
Z 8
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.75
Crystal size (mm)0.35 × 0.30 × 0.30
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker Kappa APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004)
T min, T max 0.781, 0.807
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections9801, 3027, 2280
R int 0.027
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.667
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.046, 0.159, 1.01
No. of reflections3027
No. of parameters163
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.68, −0.59

Computer programs: APEX2, SAINT and XPREP (Bruker, 2004 ▸), SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018008307/zs2400sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018008307/zs2400Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018008307/zs2400Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1587723 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H8N5+·C2Cl3O2·H2OF(000) = 1248
Mr = 306.54Dx = 1.645 Mg m3Dm = 1.646 Mg m3Dm measured by Not Measured
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 3519 reflections
a = 21.7056 (18) Åθ = 6.6–56.0°
b = 11.9074 (9) ŵ = 0.75 mm1
c = 10.9562 (6) ÅT = 293 K
β = 119.084 (5)°Block, colorless
V = 2474.7 (3) Å30.35 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm
Z = 8
Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer3027 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2280 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.027
Detector resolution: 18.4 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 3.3°
ω and φ scanh = −27→28
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004)k = −15→14
Tmin = 0.781, Tmax = 0.807l = −14→8
9801 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.159H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0984P)2 + 1.9287P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3027 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
163 parametersΔρmax = 0.68 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.59 e Å3
Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles
Refinement. Refinement on F2 for ALL reflections except those flagged by the user for potential systematic errors. Weighted R-factors wR and all goodnesses of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The observed criterion of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating -R-factor-obs etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.06709 (3)0.61615 (7)0.46638 (9)0.0614 (3)
Cl20.13757 (4)0.58198 (9)0.30457 (7)0.0653 (3)
Cl30.08995 (5)0.39459 (7)0.40021 (13)0.0922 (4)
N10.06762 (9)0.13611 (16)0.43697 (17)0.0272 (5)
N2−0.05081 (9)0.14541 (17)0.35783 (18)0.0318 (5)
N30.01987 (9)0.13451 (15)0.59533 (17)0.0260 (5)
N40.09746 (10)0.12278 (18)0.82990 (18)0.0361 (6)
N50.14168 (9)0.13060 (16)0.67706 (18)0.0293 (5)
O10.22699 (10)0.62450 (18)0.6137 (2)0.0559 (7)
C10.01284 (10)0.13863 (17)0.46625 (19)0.0242 (5)
O20.22226 (11)0.4396 (2)0.6332 (2)0.0575 (7)
C20.08544 (10)0.13021 (17)0.7000 (2)0.0251 (5)
C30.13012 (11)0.13324 (18)0.5439 (2)0.0274 (6)
C40.19386 (13)0.1349 (3)0.5269 (3)0.0442 (8)
O1W0.17844 (9)0.8439 (2)0.6222 (2)0.0433 (6)
C50.19921 (11)0.5296 (2)0.5782 (2)0.0362 (7)
C60.12614 (11)0.5291 (2)0.4432 (2)0.0374 (6)
H1N50.184000.129200.746100.0350*
H1N2−0.087100.147100.370000.0380*
H2N2−0.056200.148100.274800.0380*
H2N40.062700.120700.846800.0430*
H4A0.180400.122400.430600.0660*
H4B0.225700.076800.583100.0660*
H4C0.216700.206500.555900.0660*
H1N40.140000.120000.897700.0430*
H1O10.1914 (16)0.776 (3)0.619 (3)0.045 (8)*
H2O20.205 (2)0.868 (3)0.695 (4)0.068 (12)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0282 (3)0.0761 (6)0.0743 (5)0.0099 (3)0.0205 (3)−0.0050 (4)
Cl20.0627 (5)0.0932 (7)0.0349 (4)0.0076 (4)0.0198 (3)0.0068 (3)
Cl30.0671 (6)0.0422 (5)0.1127 (8)−0.0123 (4)0.0008 (5)−0.0058 (5)
N10.0247 (8)0.0366 (10)0.0229 (8)0.0001 (7)0.0136 (7)−0.0006 (7)
N20.0231 (8)0.0491 (11)0.0224 (8)0.0025 (8)0.0104 (7)0.0010 (8)
N30.0217 (8)0.0349 (10)0.0214 (8)0.0014 (6)0.0105 (7)0.0000 (6)
N40.0270 (9)0.0596 (13)0.0197 (8)0.0012 (8)0.0097 (7)0.0017 (8)
N50.0192 (8)0.0425 (11)0.0236 (8)0.0013 (7)0.0084 (7)0.0013 (7)
O10.0277 (9)0.0623 (14)0.0515 (11)−0.0021 (8)−0.0014 (8)−0.0080 (9)
C10.0228 (9)0.0270 (10)0.0224 (9)0.0003 (7)0.0108 (8)−0.0002 (7)
O20.0515 (11)0.0702 (14)0.0404 (10)0.0242 (10)0.0142 (9)0.0166 (9)
C20.0241 (9)0.0274 (10)0.0231 (9)0.0010 (7)0.0109 (8)0.0000 (7)
C30.0249 (9)0.0317 (11)0.0285 (10)0.0016 (8)0.0152 (8)0.0017 (8)
C40.0266 (11)0.0717 (18)0.0401 (12)0.0034 (11)0.0208 (10)0.0042 (12)
O1W0.0283 (8)0.0559 (13)0.0346 (9)0.0001 (8)0.0066 (7)−0.0048 (9)
C50.0236 (9)0.0559 (15)0.0263 (10)0.0094 (10)0.0100 (8)0.0022 (10)
C60.0267 (10)0.0378 (12)0.0378 (11)0.0020 (9)0.0079 (9)0.0014 (10)
Cl1—C61.760 (3)N2—H1N20.8600
Cl2—C61.770 (2)N2—H2N20.8600
Cl3—C61.745 (3)C3—C41.483 (4)
N1—C11.374 (3)N4—H2N40.8600
N1—C31.292 (3)N4—H1N40.8600
N2—C11.316 (3)N5—H1N50.8600
N3—C21.325 (3)C4—H4B0.9600
N3—C11.348 (3)C4—H4C0.9600
N4—C21.319 (3)C4—H4A0.9600
N5—C21.361 (3)C5—C61.557 (3)
N5—C31.355 (3)O1W—H1O10.86 (4)
O1—C51.251 (3)O1W—H2O20.78 (4)
O2—C51.212 (3)
C1—N1—C3115.80 (18)C2—N5—H1N5121.00
C1—N3—C2115.8 (2)C3—N5—H1N5120.00
C2—N5—C3119.06 (19)C3—C4—H4A109.00
N1—C1—N2116.02 (18)C3—C4—H4B110.00
N1—C1—N3125.08 (19)C3—C4—H4C109.00
N2—C1—N3118.9 (2)H4A—C4—H4B109.00
N3—C2—N4120.1 (2)H4A—C4—H4C110.00
N3—C2—N5121.50 (19)H4B—C4—H4C109.00
N4—C2—N5118.3 (2)O1—C5—O2128.6 (2)
C1—N2—H1N2120.00O1—C5—C6114.4 (2)
C1—N2—H2N2120.00O2—C5—C6116.9 (2)
H1N2—N2—H2N2120.00Cl1—C6—Cl2109.27 (13)
N1—C3—N5122.7 (2)Cl1—C6—Cl3108.40 (15)
N1—C3—C4121.2 (2)Cl1—C6—C5109.74 (15)
N5—C3—C4116.1 (2)Cl2—C6—Cl3109.12 (12)
C2—N4—H2N4120.00Cl2—C6—C5108.12 (17)
C2—N4—H1N4120.00Cl3—C6—C5112.16 (16)
H2N4—N4—H1N4120.00H1O1—O1W—H2O2107 (3)
C3—N1—C1—N2177.8 (2)C3—N5—C2—N4177.2 (2)
C3—N1—C1—N3−2.4 (3)C2—N5—C3—N10.4 (3)
C1—N1—C3—N51.3 (3)C2—N5—C3—C4179.3 (2)
C1—N1—C3—C4−177.5 (2)O1—C5—C6—Cl1−59.0 (3)
C2—N3—C1—N11.6 (3)O1—C5—C6—Cl260.1 (3)
C2—N3—C1—N2−178.58 (19)O1—C5—C6—Cl3−179.51 (19)
C1—N3—C2—N4−178.1 (2)O2—C5—C6—Cl1122.4 (2)
C1—N3—C2—N50.3 (3)O2—C5—C6—Cl2−118.5 (2)
C3—N5—C2—N3−1.3 (3)O2—C5—C6—Cl31.9 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H1N5···O1i0.861.792.652 (3)178
N2—H1N2···O1Wii0.862.032.886 (3)174
N2—H2N2···N1iii0.862.213.071 (3)174
N4—H2N4···N3iv0.862.183.034 (3)173
N4—H1N4···O1Wv0.862.222.834 (3)128
O1W—H1O1···O10.86 (4)1.97 (4)2.835 (3)176 (3)
O1W—H2O2···O2vi0.78 (4)1.97 (4)2.741 (3)173 (3)
  19 in total

1.  Synthesis of novel tripodal-benzimidazole from 2,4,6-tris(p-formylphenoxy)-1,3,5-triazine: structural, electrochemical and antimicrobial studies.

Authors:  Ziya Erdem Koc; Haluk Bingol; Ahmet O Saf; Emrah Torlak; Ahmet Coskun
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  Syntheses of 2,4,6-trisubstituted triazines as antimalarial agents.

Authors:  Anu Agarwal; Kumkum Srivastava; S K Puri; Prem M S Chauhan
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  A new series of estrogen receptor modulators that display selectivity for estrogen receptor beta.

Authors:  Brad R Henke; Thomas G Consler; Ning Go; Ron L Hale; Dana R Hohman; Stacey A Jones; Amy T Lu; Linda B Moore; John T Moore; Lisa A Orband-Miller; R Graham Robinett; Jean Shearin; Paul K Spearing; Eugene L Stewart; Philip S Turnbull; Susan L Weaver; Shawn P Williams; G Bruce Wisely; Millard H Lambert
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Design and synthesis of a series of melamine-based nitroheterocycles with activity against Trypanosomatid parasites.

Authors:  Alessandro Baliani; Gorka Jimenez Bueno; Mhairi L Stewart; Vanessa Yardley; Reto Brun; Michael P Barrett; Ian H Gilbert
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  2,4-Diamino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ium trifluoroacetate.

Authors:  Genivaldo Júlio Perpétuo; Jan Janczak
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  2,4-Diamino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ium chloride.

Authors:  Hui-Fen Qian; Wei Huang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-03-06

7.  2,4-Diamino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ium nitrate.

Authors:  Ying Fan; Wei You; Hui-Fen Qian; Jian-Lan Liu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-02-11

8.  2,4-Diamino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ium hydrogen oxalate.

Authors:  Leila Narimani; Bohari M Yamin
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-04-21

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  DFT, hirshfeld and molecular docking studies of a hybrid compound - 2,4-Diamino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ium hydrogen oxalate as a promising anti -breast cancer agent.

Authors:  K Ayisha Begam; N Kanagathara; M K Marchewka; An-Ya Lo
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.