| Literature DB >> 30002725 |
Luis J Mena1, Vanessa G Félix1, Alberto Ochoa2, Rodolfo Ostos1, Eduardo González1, Javier Aspuru2, Pablo Velarde3, Gladys E Maestre4.
Abstract
Mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring is an emerging area that has received increasing attention in recent years, but still real-life validation for elderly residing in low and middle-income countries is scarce. We developed a wearable ECG monitor that is integrated with a self-designed wireless sensor for ECG signal acquisition. It is used with a native purposely designed smartphone application, based on machine learning techniques, for automated classification of captured ECG beats from aged people. When tested on 100 older adults, the monitoring system discriminated normal and abnormal ECG signals with a high degree of accuracy (97%), sensitivity (100%), and specificity (96.6%). With further verification, the system could be useful for detecting cardiac abnormalities in the home environment and contribute to prevention, early diagnosis, and effective treatment of cardiovascular diseases, while keeping costs down and increasing access to healthcare services for older persons.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30002725 PMCID: PMC5996445 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9128054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1General architecture of a mobile personal health monitor system.
Figure 2Framework of the mobile personal health monitor system.
Figure 3Schematic representation of the ECG amplifier circuit and electrode placement on the body.
Figure 4Encapsulation with four LM324 operational amplifiers to amplify, filter, and add voltage to the ECG signal.
Figure 5Prototype of the self-designed ECG sensor device.
Performance summary of the ECG sensor device.
|
| Low-Power Microchip 8-bit AVR RISC-Based Microcontroller |
|
| 3.3 V |
|
| 100 MΩ |
|
| Range 0.1Hz and Internal 8MHz Calibrated Oscillator |
|
| >90dB |
|
| 45 |
|
| 9.6KHz |
|
| 8 bits |
Figure 6ECG signal processing: (a) first stage of amplification; (b) impedance coupling; (c) second stage of amplification; (d) low-pass filtering; (e) high-pass filtering; (f) positive ECG signal on smartphone screen.
Figure 7Screenshots of ECG analysis process on smartphone.
Figure 8Neural network architecture with the best performance.
Confusion matrix for classification of the test dataset.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 13 |
Total test performance of the mobile PHM system.
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| 100 |
|
| 96.6 |
|
| 97 |
|
| 81.3 |