| Literature DB >> 25996508 |
Fen Miao1,2, Yayu Cheng3, Yi He4, Qingyun He5,6, Ye Li7.
Abstract
Continuously monitoring the ECG signals over hours combined with activity status is very important for preventing cardiovascular diseases. A traditional ECG holter is often inconvenient to carry because it has many electrodes attached to the chest and because it is heavy. This work proposes a wearable, low power context-aware ECG monitoring system integrated built-in kinetic sensors of the smartphone with a self-designed ECG sensor. The wearable ECG sensor is comprised of a fully integrated analog front-end (AFE), a commercial micro control unit (MCU), a secure digital (SD) card, and a Bluetooth module. The whole sensor is very small with a size of only 58 × 50 × 10 mm for wearable monitoring application due to the AFE design, and the total power dissipation in a full round of ECG acquisition is only 12.5 mW. With the help of built-in kinetic sensors of the smartphone, the proposed system can compute and recognize user's physical activity, and thus provide context-aware information for the continuous ECG monitoring. The experimental results demonstrated the performance of proposed system in improving diagnosis accuracy for arrhythmias and identifying the most common abnormal ECG patterns in different activities. In conclusion, we provide a wearable, accurate and energy-efficient system for long-term and context-aware ECG monitoring without any extra cost on kinetic sensor design but with the help of the widespread smartphone.Entities:
Keywords: context-aware; physical activity recognition; power control; wearable ECG sensor
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25996508 PMCID: PMC4481936 DOI: 10.3390/s150511465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic diagram of proposed context-aware electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring system.
Figure 2Architecture of traditional acquisition device.
Figure 3Block diagram of the analog front-end (AFE).
Figure 4Flow diagram of the scheduling of a micro control unit (MCU).
Figure 9Screenshot of smartphone (a) abnormal ECG signal; (b) the brief report.
Figure 5The block diagram of the physical activity recognition scheme.
Figure 6(a) The micro photograph; (b) Experiment of proposed AFE in ECG Acquisition device.
Figure 7Photograph of proposed ECG Acquisition device.
Figure 8ECG acquisition sensor hardware validation procedure.
Performance summary of the ECG sensor hardware.
| CMOS 0.18 μm | |
| 3 V | |
| 1.3 mm × 1.1 mm | |
| >5 MΩ | |
| <20 Hz for 8 inputted frequency | |
| >85 dB | |
| <15 μV | |
| 360 | |
| 150 Hz, 250 Hz, 500 Hz | |
| 32 bit |
Power consumption of the proposed ECG acquisition device.
| AFE | MCU | SD Card | Power Module and Other Circuits | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 2.67 | 6 (on average) | 3.53 | |
| 2.4 | 21.36 | 48 | 28.24 | |
| 12.5 | ||||
| 30 h (one 130 mAh AA battery) | ||||
Performance comparison between our system and other recent similar works.
| This Work | Sensors 2013[ | ISITME 2011 | IEEE EMBC 2006 [ | Holter ECG System (TLC4000) [ | Holter Recording (DMS3004A) [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | |
| 5.8 × 5.0 × 1.0 cm3 | 5.8 × 5.0 × 0.4 cm3 (Without Package) | 5.5 × 3.4 × 1.6 cm3 (Without Package) | N/A | N/A | 8.8 × 5.5 × 2.1 cm3 | |
| 3 | 3 | 3.3 | 3 | 3 | 1.5 | |
| 12.5 | 84.83 | 115 | 375 | 312.5 | 25 | |
| SD Card | SD Card | N | SD Card | Build-in memory | Build-in memory | |
| 20 | 38 (exclude battery) | 20.7 (exclude battery) | N/A | N/A | 100 |
Average signal cross correlation between ECG generator device and the proposed sensor.
| Frequency (BPM) | 30 | 60 | 80 | 120 | 160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amplitudes (mV) | ||||||
| 0.985 | 0.983 | 0.983 | 0.984 | 0.985 | ||
| 0.983 | 0.985 | 0.984 | 0.984 | 0.983 | ||
| 0.984 | 0.983 | 0.983 | 0.986 | 0.983 | ||
| 0.983 | 0.984 | 0.983 | 0.984 | 0.985 | ||
Average QRS amplitude ratio between ECG generator device and the proposed sensor.
| Frequency (BPM) | 30 | 60 | 80 | 120 | 160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amplitudes (mV) | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Daily life activity.
| Activity | Time Duration |
|---|---|
| Sitting | 30 s |
| Sit-to-Stand | 5 s |
| Standing | 30 s |
| Stand-to-Sit | 5 s |
Performance comparison between the proposed sensor and BIOPAC in real-life setting.
| Performance | QRS Detection Error No. (Avg ± std) | QRS Amplitude Ratio (Avg ± std) | QRS Cross Correlation (Avg ± std) | QRS Detection Delay No. (Avg ± std) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activity | |||||
| Sitting | 0.825 ± 0.836 | 0.987 ± 0.154 | 0.928 ± 0.137 | 0.687 ± 0.704 | |
| Sit-to-Stand | 0.259 ± 0.117 | 1.082 ± 0.057 | 0.896± 0.106 | 0.524 ± 0.442 | |
| Standing | 0.793 ± 0.689 | 1.061 ± 0.072 | 0.908 ± 0.174 | 0.712 ± 0.812 | |
| Stand-to-Sit | 0.296 ± 0.124 | 0.899 ± 0.043 | 0.886 ± 0.157 | 0.465 ± 0.385 | |
Confusion matrix of J48 decision tree.
| Model | Walking | Running | Rest | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | ||||
| 51 | 1 | |||
| 68 | 0 | |||
| 16 | 0 | |||
Abbreviations in the report.
| Abbreviations | Full Name |
|---|---|
| BG | Bigeminy |
| TBG | Trigeminy |
| SA | Sinus arrhythmia |
| MB | Missed beat |
| VPB | Ventricular premature beats |
| APB | Atrial premature beats |
| IVBP | Interpolated ventricular premature beat |
| VT | Ventricular tachycardia |
| PB | Pause Beat |
Discrimination ability of the proposed software.
| Items | True Positive | False Negative | True Negative | False Positive | Discrimination Ability (HTER) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG | 444 | 3 | 2024 | 0 | 0.34% | |
| TBG | 258 | 0 | 2213 | 0 | 0 | |
| SA | 200 | 0 | 2271 | 0 | 0 | |
| MB | 125 | 1 | 2345 | 0 | 0.345% | |
| VPB | 149 | 3 | 2315 | 4 | 1.04% | |
| APB | 247 | 1 | 2220 | 3 | 0.27% | |
| PB | 49 | 1 | 2421 | 0 | 1% | |
| VT | 287 | 3 | 2179 | 0 | 0.5% | |
| Tachycardia | 200 | 0 | 2271 | 0 | 0 | |
Figure 10The experiment of ECG Acquisition system with physical activity recognition on a treadmill.
Figure 11The screenshot of smartphone (a) the subject was resting; (b) the subject was walking on the treadmill; (c) the subject was running on the treadmill; (d) the subject rested 30 s after running; (e) the subject rested 90 s after running; (f) the subject rested 300 s after running.
Statistical analysis on the performance of proposed context-aware ECG system.
| Abnormal Patterns | Detected from ECG Sensor | Detected from Context-Aware ECG Sensor | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|
| BG | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TBG | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SA | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MB | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PB | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VPB | 4 | 4 (3 in running, 1 in walking) | 4 |
| APB | 5 | 5 (3 in running, 1 in walking, 1 in rest) | 5 |
| IVBP | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VT | 31 | 9 (8 in running, 1 in walking) | 10 |
| Tachycardia | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Discrimination ability comparison between the proposed context-aware ECG system and single ECG sensor. TP: true positive, FN: false negative, TN: true negative, FP: false positive.
| ECG Beat Number | Discrimination Ability (HTER) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | FN | TN | FP | ||
| 18 | 1 | 7054 | 27 | 2.8% | |
| 18 | 1 | 7081 | 0 | 2.6% | |