Literature DB >> 29998074

Evidence based outcomes of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Registry.

Sunny D Mitchell1, Shawna C Willey2, Peter Beitsch3, Sheldon Feldman4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Registry (NSMR) is a prospective, non-randomized, IRB approved, multi-institutional registry. The purpose of this Registry is to provide a large, prospective, non-randomized database of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical technique, and outcome (both aesthetic and oncologic) of the nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM).
METHODS: Data is entered into the ASBrS NSMR, housed within the Mastery of Surgery Program, after patients consent to participation. Each investigator routinely offers NSM in their practice has obtained IRB approval and completed forms of agreement to participate in the ASBrS NSMR.
RESULTS: This data set represents a total of 1,935 NSMs performed on 1,170 patients by 98 investigators from 70 institutions/sites. Of the 1,935 NSMs: 833 were performed for an indication of cancer [594 invasive carcinoma and 239 for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)] and 1,102 were prophylactic. Of the 1,170 total patients, 352 underwent a unilateral and 818 underwent a bilateral NSM. Recurrence at a mean follow-up of 31 months/median follow-up of 27 months, with a range of 9.7 to 58.3 months since surgery was 1.4% with no recurrences at the nipple or nipple areola complex (NAC). Cancer occurrence (0.3%) also did not involve the nipple/NAC. Overall patient satisfaction of excellent/good: 94.9% and overall cosmesis (surgeon rated) of excellent/good was 96.4%. Overall infection rates included flap infection of 4.4%, NAC complication rate of 4.5% (defined as necrosis/other or ischemia/epidermolysis requiring surgery), and a 10% rate of NAC epidermolysis with full recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: NSMs were performed on breasts with a variety of sizes and degrees of ptosis, via multiple incisions, dissection and reconstruction techniques with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction and surgeon rated cosmesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM); outcome data

Year:  2018        PMID: 29998074      PMCID: PMC6006016          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.09.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  66 in total

1.  Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Roland Reitsamer; Florentia Peintinger
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Is Single-Stage Prosthetic Reconstruction Cost Effective? A Cost-Utility Analysis for the Use of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Relative to Expander-Implant Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients.

Authors:  Naveen M Krishnan; John P Fischer; Marten N Basta; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

Authors:  Virgilio Sacchini; José A Pinotti; Alfredo C S D Barros; Alberto Luini; Alfonso Pluchinotta; Marianne Pinotti; Marcelo G Boratto; Marco D Ricci; Carlos A Ruiz; Antonio C Nisida; Paolo Veronesi; Jean Petit; Paolo Arnone; Fabio Bassi; Joseph J Disa; Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Patrick I Borgen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Long-Term Psychosocial Functioning in Women with Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Does Preservation of the Nipple-Areolar Complex Make a Difference?

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Tulin D Cil; John L Semple; Lucy Dong Xuan Li; Shaghayegh Bagher; Toni Zhong; Sophia Virani; Steven Narod; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Keith M Blechman; Nolan S Karp; Chaya Levovitz; Amber A Guth; Deborah M Axelrod; Richard L Shapiro; Mihye Choi
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy via an inframammary fold incision for patients with scarring from prior lumpectomy.

Authors:  Tara L Huston; Kevin Small; Alexander J Swistel; Briar L Dent; Mia Talmor
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Catherine M Hannan; Shawna C Willey; Costanza Cocilovo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease.

Authors:  Eric C Burdge; James Yuen; Matthew Hardee; Pranjali V Gadgil; Chandan Das; Ronda Henry-Tillman; Daniela Ochoa; Soheila Korourian; V Suzanne Klimberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Suzanne B Coopey; Rong Tang; Lan Lei; Phoebe E Freer; Kari Kansal; Amy S Colwell; Michele A Gadd; Michelle C Specht; William G Austen; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  TiLoop® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series.

Authors:  Donato Casella; Marco Bernini; Lapo Bencini; Jenny Roselli; Maria Teresa Lacaria; Jacopo Martellucci; Roberto Banfi; Claudio Calabrese; Lorenzo Orzalesi
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08-03
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in intermediate-risk breast cancer : Indication and technical considerations.

Authors:  Thomas Hehr; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Marciana-Nona Duma; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; David Krug; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederick Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer: the importance of intraoperative evaluation of retroareolar margins and intra-nipple duct removal.

Authors:  Rebeca Neves Heinzen; Alfredo Carlos Simões Dornellas de Barros; Filomena Marino Carvalho; Fernando Nalesso Aguiar; Cristiane da Costa Bandeira Abrahão Nimir; Alfredo Luiz Jacomo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-06

3.  Health-Related Quality of Life After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Results From the INSPIRE Registry.

Authors:  Antonio J Esgueva; Iris Noordhoek; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Martin Espinosa-Bravo; Zoltán Mátrai; Andrii Zhygulin; Arvids Irmejs; Carlos Mavioso; Francesco Meani; Eduardo González; Murat Özdemir; Tanir Allweis; Karol Rogowski; Catarina Rodrigues Dos Santos; Henrique Mora; Riccardo Ponzone; Domenico Samorani; Cornelis van de Velde; Riccardo A Audisio; Isabel T Rubio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Tumor-to-Nipple Distance in Selecting Patients for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Sharon L Kracoff-Sella; Tanir M Allweis; Inna Bokov; Hadas Kadar-Sfarad; Yehonatan Shifer; Evgenia Golzman; Dana Egozi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-07-21

5.  Outcome Analysis Depending on the Different Types of Incision following Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Woo; Jin Mi Choi; Jin Sup Eom; Eun Key Kim; Hyun Ho Han
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.269

Review 6.  Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.

Authors:  Uhi Toh; Miki Takenaka; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Ptosis: Using a Free Nipple Graft with Tissue Expander Reconstruction.

Authors:  Luwam Ghidei; Hannah A Bansil; Ashley Stuckey; Sonali Pandya; David Edmonson; Pierre Michaud; Jennifer Gass
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-24

8.  Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?

Authors:  N Heine; V Hoesl; S Seitz; L Prantl; V Brebant
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Identification of Independent Risk Factors for Skin Complications in a Multifactorial Logistic Regression Analysis of Simultaneous Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Skin Reduction Mastectomy in Large and Ptotic Breasts Using an Inferiorly Based Deepithelialized Dermal Breast Flap.

Authors:  Felix H Vollbach; Benjamin F Thomas; Hisham Fansa
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.