Literature DB >> 23975296

Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Suzanne B Coopey1, Rong Tang, Lan Lei, Phoebe E Freer, Kari Kansal, Amy S Colwell, Michele A Gadd, Michelle C Specht, William G Austen, Barbara L Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) varies widely on the basis of patient and tumor factors.
METHODS: Review of patients undergoing NSM from June 2007 to December 2012 at our institution was performed. Patient and tumor characteristics, complications, and recurrences were collected. NSM from 2007 to 2010 and 2011 to 2012 were compared to assess trends in eligibility and outcomes over time.
RESULTS: NSM was performed on 645 breasts in 370 patients. Indications were risk reduction in 330 (51.2 %), invasive cancer in 226 (35.0 %), and ductal carcinoma-in situ in 89 (13.8 %) breasts. Fifty-one (13.8 %) patients had positive lymph nodes. Twenty-seven (7.3 %) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-eight (7.4 %) breasts had prior radiotherapy. Total nipple necrosis occurred in 11 (1.7 %) breasts. Twenty-four (3.7 %) breasts had nipples removed as a result of positive subareolar/nipple margins. At 22 months' mean follow-up, local recurrence occurred in 4 of 156 (2.6 %) breasts operated on for cancer through 2011. No recurrences involved the nipple. NSM performed in 2011-2012 (n = 475) compared to 2007-2010 (n = 170), were more often for cancer, in patients with higher body mass index, and on larger breasts (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in total nipple necrosis rates between groups. Nipple loss due to positive subareolar/nipple margins was significantly less in 2011-2012 (p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Eligibility for NSM has expanded to include women with higher body mass index and larger breasts, with no increase in nipple loss due to ischemia. Rates of positive subareolar margins have decreased over time, even though NSM is being performed more frequently for cancer, suggesting improved patient selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23975296     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3152-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  22 in total

1.  Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cindy H Wei; Amie M Scott; Alison N Price; Helen Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Sabrina M Jhanwar; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Colleen McCarthy; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 2.  The use of postoperative radiation after nipple sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

3.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (Review).

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Edna Holz-Sapra; Dirk Rades; Alexander Moser; Gabriela Studer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Conservative mastectomies for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Aidan T Manning; Virgilio S Sacchini
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

5.  Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M G Valero; T-A Moo; S Muhsen; E C Zabor; M Stempel; A Pusic; M L Gemignani; M Morrow; V Sacchini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm.

Authors:  Jai Min Ryu; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Soo Youn Bae; Ha Woo Yi; Sungmin Park; Hyun-June Paik; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Increase in Utilization of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Indications, Complications, and Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Monica G Valero; Shirin Muhsen; Tracy-Ann Moo; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Andrea Pusic; Mary L Gemignani; Monica Morrow; Virgilio S Sacchini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Nipple sparing mastectomy techniques: a literature review and an inframammary technique.

Authors:  Andrew Y Ashikari; Pond R Kelemen; Bahar Tastan; C Andrew Salzberg; Roy H Ashikari
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 9.  Overview of indications for nipple sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Eleni Tousimis; Michelle Haslinger
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

10.  A critical look at the effect of hyperbaric oxygen on the ischemic nipple following nipple sparing mastectomy and implant based reconstruction: a case series.

Authors:  John Shuck; Neil O'Kelly; Matthew Endara; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.