Literature DB >> 23975304

Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease.

Eric C Burdge1, James Yuen, Matthew Hardee, Pranjali V Gadgil, Chandan Das, Ronda Henry-Tillman, Daniela Ochoa, Soheila Korourian, V Suzanne Klimberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple skin-sparing mastectomy (NSSM) are procedures commonly offered as part of the surgical treatment for breast cancer. Each involves a mastectomy with preservation of the skin overlying the breast (in SSM) and often also the skin overlying the nipple-areolar complex (NSSM). At the time of mastectomy, immediate reconstruction with a tissue expander or implant is performed for a more favorable cosmetic outcome. Until now, these procedures have been reserved for low-risk patients and are rarely offered to patients with advanced disease where neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postmastectomy radiation are a planned part of the treatment. We report our experience of SSM and NSSM in such high-risk patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study from 2001 to 2012 evaluates the outcomes of 527 patients who underwent SSM or NSSM. Sixty patients with advanced disease who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by SSM or NSSM with immediate reconstruction and subsequent radiotherapy (RT) were identified. The cosmetic and oncologic outcomes of this patient group were noted.
RESULTS: A total of 527 patients in our study group had a total of 1,035 skin-sparing mastectomies (558 NSSM and 477 SSM; 444 patients with bilateral and 83 with unilateral procedures). Of the 60 patients with locally advanced disease, 39 underwent NSSM and 21 underwent SSM. All patients received RT to the diseased side. Mean age of the group was 50.2 ± 10.8 years, with a range of 27-75 years for NSSM and 29-73 years for SSM. The lymph node status was positive in 71.8 % with an average tumor size of 3.8 ± 2.5 cm. The overall radiation-induced complication rate was 38.1 % (8 of 21) in the SSM group and 30.8 % (12 of 39) in the NSSM group. Wound infections and tissue necrosis occurred at a rate of 16.7 %. The implant was removed in 5 % of these cases. Capsular contracture occurred at a rate of 10.2 %. Radiation-related nonbreast complications occurred in 6.7 % of the cases. Examples of these radiation-related nonbreast complications included radiation pneumonitis, stenosis of the superior vena cava requiring venoplasty and severe atypical chest pain thought to be consistent with osteochondritis. The locoregional recurrence rate (median follow-up of 18 months) was 14.3 % (3 of 21) in the SSM group and 10.3 % (4 of 39) in the NSSM group.
CONCLUSIONS: SSM and NSSM have been offered to patients with relatively low-risk breast cancer as oncologically safe while affording superior cosmesis with one-step immediate reconstruction. Our series demonstrates that either procedure can be offered to patients with more advanced cancers requiring postoperative RT. The complication rates are comparable to those reported for patients undergoing RT after traditional mastectomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23975304     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3174-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  26 in total

Review 1.  Current strategies with 2-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Christin Harless; Steven R Jacobson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Current perspectives on radiation therapy in autologous and prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark W Clemens; Steven J Kronowitz
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  The breast surgeons' approach to mastectomy and prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Toni Storm-Dickerson; Noemi M Sigalove
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

Review 4.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Implant Reconstruction in Nipple Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Carrie K Chu; Matthew J Davis; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Sebastian J Winocour; Albert Losken; Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (Review).

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Edna Holz-Sapra; Dirk Rades; Alexander Moser; Gabriela Studer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy is Not Associated with a Delay of Adjuvant Treatment.

Authors:  Emily L Albright; Mary C Schroeder; Kendra Foster; Sonia L Sugg; Lillian M Erdahl; Ronald J Weigel; Ingrid M Lizarraga
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Surgical decision making in conservative mastectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Catanuto; Nicola Rocco; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

9.  Increase in Utilization of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Indications, Complications, and Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Monica G Valero; Shirin Muhsen; Tracy-Ann Moo; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Andrea Pusic; Mary L Gemignani; Monica Morrow; Virgilio S Sacchini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Effectiveness and Safety of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  René Aloisio da Costa Vieira; Luciana Machado Ribeiro; Guilherme Freire Angotti Carrara; Lucas Faria Abrahão-Machado; Ligia Maria Kerr; Afonso Celso Pinto Nazário
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.