Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) occurring at the cervical levels can result in significantly impaired arm and hand function. People with cervical-level SCI desire improved use of their arms and hands, anticipating that regained function will result in improved independence and ultimately improved quality of life. Neuroprostheses provide the most promising method for significant gain in hand and arm function for persons with cervical-level SCI. Neuroprostheses utilize small electrical currents to activate peripheral motor nerves, resulting in controlled contraction of paralyzed muscles. Methods: A myoelectrically-controlled neuroprosthesis was evaluated in 15 arms in 13 individuals with cervical-level SCI. All individuals had motor level C5 or C6 tetraplegia. Results: This study demonstrates that an implanted neuroprosthesis utilizing myoelectric signal (MES)-controlled stimulation allows considerable flexibility in the control algorithms that can be utilized for a variety of arm and hand functions. Improved active range of motion, grip strength, and the ability to pick up and release objects were improved in all arms tested. Adverse events were few and were consistent with the experience with similar active implantable devices. Conclusion: For individuals with cervical SCI who are highly motivated, implanted neuroprostheses provide the opportunity to gain arm and hand function that cannot be gained through the use of orthotics or surgical intervention alone. Upper extremity neuroprostheses have been shown to provide increased function and independence for persons with cervical-level SCI.
Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) occurring at the cervical levels can result in significantly impaired arm and hand function. People with cervical-level SCI desire improved use of their arms and hands, anticipating that regained function will result in improved independence and ultimately improved quality of life. Neuroprostheses provide the most promising method for significant gain in hand and arm function for persons with cervical-level SCI. Neuroprostheses utilize small electrical currents to activate peripheral motor nerves, resulting in controlled contraction of paralyzed muscles. Methods: A myoelectrically-controlled neuroprosthesis was evaluated in 15 arms in 13 individuals with cervical-level SCI. All individuals had motor level C5 or C6 tetraplegia. Results: This study demonstrates that an implanted neuroprosthesis utilizing myoelectric signal (MES)-controlled stimulation allows considerable flexibility in the control algorithms that can be utilized for a variety of arm and hand functions. Improved active range of motion, grip strength, and the ability to pick up and release objects were improved in all arms tested. Adverse events were few and were consistent with the experience with similar active implantable devices. Conclusion: For individuals with cervical SCI who are highly motivated, implanted neuroprostheses provide the opportunity to gain arm and hand function that cannot be gained through the use of orthotics or surgical intervention alone. Upper extremity neuroprostheses have been shown to provide increased function and independence for persons with cervical-level SCI.
Authors: Ronald L Hart; Niloy Bhadra; Fred W Montague; Kevin L Kilgore; P Hunter Peckham Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: F Biering-Sørensen; H Gregersen; E Hagen; M Haugland; M Keith; C F Larsen; B P Leicht; F H Nielsen; E Rabischong; T Sinkjaer Journal: Ugeskr Laeger Date: 2000-04-10
Authors: Steven C Kirshblum; William Waring; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Stephen P Burns; Mark Johansen; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Donovan; Daniel Graves; Amit Jha; Linda Jones; M J Mulcahey; Andrei Krassioukov Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: K L Kilgore; P H Peckham; M W Keith; G B Thrope; K S Wuolle; A M Bryden; R L Hart Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Clara Farrehi; Carlotta Pazzi; Maclain Capron; Kim Anderson; Bonnie Richardson; Michael Stillman Journal: Spinal Cord Ser Cases Date: 2020-11-23
Authors: Lucas R L Cardoso; Vanesa Bochkezanian; Arturo Forner-Cordero; Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Antonio P L Bo Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 5.208