Literature DB >> 15672628

Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population.

Kim D Anderson1.   

Abstract

In the United States alone, there are more than 200,000 individuals living with a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Healthcare for these individuals creates a significant economic burden for the country, not to mention the physiological, psychological, and social suffering these people endure everyday. Regaining partial function can lead to greater independence, thereby improving quality of life. To ascertain what functions are most important to the SCI population, in regard to enhancing quality of life, a novel survey was performed in which subjects were asked to rank seven functions in order of importance to their quality of life. The survey was distributed via email, postal mail, the internet, interview, and word of mouth to the SCI community at large. A total of 681 responses were completed. Regaining arm and hand function was most important to quadriplegics, while regaining sexual function was the highest priority for paraplegics. Improving bladder and bowel function was of shared importance to both injury groups. A longitudinal analysis revealed only slight differences between individuals injured <3 years compared to those injured >3 years. The majority of participants indicated that exercise was important to functional recovery, yet more than half either did not have access to exercise or did not have access to a trained therapist to oversee that exercise. In order to improve the relevance of research in this area, the concerns of the SCI population must be better known and taken into account. This approach is consistent with and emphasized by the new NIH roadmap to discovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15672628     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  537 in total

1.  IT delivery of ChABC modulates NG2 and promotes GAP-43 axonal regrowth after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  I Novotna; L Slovinska; I Vanicky; M Cizek; J Radonak; D Cizkova
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 2.  A systematic review of the effects of pharmacological agents on walking function in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Antoinette Domingo; Abdulaziz A Al-Yahya; Yousif Asiri; Janice J Eng; Tania Lam
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Behavioral testing in animal models of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K Fouad; C Ng; D M Basso
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  A novel myoelectric pattern recognition strategy for hand function restoration after incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Ping Zhou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  Training to achieve over ground walking after spinal cord injury: a review of who, what, when, and how.

Authors:  Jaynie F Yang; Kristin E Musselman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Implanted electrical stimulation of the trunk for seated postural stability and function after cervical spinal cord injury: a single case study.

Authors:  Ronald J Triolo; Lisa Boggs; Michael E Miller; Gregory Nemunaitis; Jennifer Nagy; Stephanie Nogan Bailey
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Automated FES for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edmund F Hodkin; Yuming Lei; Jonathan Humby; Isabel S Glover; Supriyo Choudhury; Hrishikesh Kumar; Monica A Perez; Helen Rodgers; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Mechanism of action of sacral nerve stimulation using a transdermal amplitude-modulated signal in a spinal cord injury rodent model.

Authors:  Mohamed S Elkelini; Igor Pravdivyi; Magdy M Hassouna
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Translational spinal cord injury research: preclinical guidelines and challenges.

Authors:  Paul J Reier; Michael A Lane; Edward D Hall; Y D Teng; Dena R Howland
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

10.  Neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: what is meaningful? A patients' and physicians' perspective.

Authors:  Paula Valerie Ter Wengel; Marcel W M Post; Enrico Martin; Janneke Stolwijk-Swuste; Allard Jan Frederik Hosman; Said Sadiqi; William Peter Vandertop; Fetullah Cumhur Öner
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.