| Literature DB >> 29991951 |
Wubante Demilew1, Getnet Mequanint Adinew2, Seyfe Asrade2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medicinal plants play indispensable roles to treat various ailments. Acanthus polystachyus is one of the medicinal plants used traditionally for treatment of wounds. However, there were no scientific reports documented so far on the wound healing activities of this plant. Thus, the present study provides a scientific evaluation for the wound healing potential of the crude extract of A. polystachyus leaves.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29991951 PMCID: PMC6016231 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2047896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Photograph of incision wound on day 0 and measurement of tensile strength on 10th day using water flow technique.
Effect of topical application of the 80% methanolic extract of the leaves of A. polystachyus on wound contraction of excision wound model in mice.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0 | 301.21 ± 6.14 | 301.21 ± 6.14 | 298.70 ± 6.84 | 301.21 ± 6.14 |
| 2 | 278.81 ± 9.13 | 264.55 ± 12.29 | 273.71 ± 6.12 | 264.02 ± 6.12 | |
| 4 | 240.61 ± 6.14 | 210.38 ± 12.7 | 222.81 ± 8.16 | 209.60 ± 5.46 | |
| 6 | 214.18 ± 8.62 | 155.96 ± 15.43 a2 | 165.51 ± 7.55 a1 | 123.63 ± 9.97 a3c1 | |
| 8 | 169.56 ± 9.56 | 91.32 ± 11.85 a3 | 98.78 ± 8.57 a3 | 64.89 ± 8.17 a3 | |
| 10 | 130.71±12.31 | 48.80 ± 4.65 a3 | 52.99 ± 5.05 a3 | 24.08 ± 5.39 a3c1 | |
| 12 | 94.07 ± 12.43 | 23.81 ± 4.76 a3 | 23.68 ± 47.09 a3 | 3.40 ± 1.29 a3 | |
| 14 | 50.89 ± 10.02 | 4.97 ± 1.99 a3 | 7.07 ± 3.18 a3 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a3 | |
| 16 | 31.01± 5.38 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a3 | 1.70 ± 1.18 a3 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a3 |
SO, simple ointment base; CEO, crude extract ointment; NF, nitrofurazone; n = 6 animals in each group. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), one-way ANOVA. aAgainst control and cagainst 5% (w/w) hydroalcoholic extract; 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.01, and 3P < 0.001.
Figure 2Effects of the 80% methanolic extract of A. polystachyus D. leaves on the percentage of wound closure of excision wound model in mice.
Effect of topical application of the 80% methanolic crude extract ointment of the leaves of A. polystachyus D. on period of epithelialization (number of days).
| Treatment groups | Period of epithelialization (days) | % decrease in epithelialization periods |
|---|---|---|
| Simple ointment base | 20.83 ± 1.01 | - |
| Nitrofurazone (0.2 % w/w) | 15.33 ± 0.42 a3 | 26.4 |
| 5% crude extract ointment (w/w) | 15.83 ± 0.65 a3 | 24 |
| 10% crude extract ointment ( w/w) | 13.17 ± 0.40 a3c1 | 36.8 |
Note: values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), one-way ANOVA. aCompared to negative control (simple ointment); ccompared to 5% ointment; 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.01, and 3P < 0.001, when compared to control group, one-way ANOVA.
Figure 3Effects of 80% methanolic crude extract ointment of A. polystachyus leaves on percentage of wound closure of infected wound model in mice.
Effect of topical application of 80% methanolic crude extract ointment of the leaves of A. polystachyus on wound contraction of infected wound model in mice.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0 | 298.20 ± 6.84 | 301.21 ± 6.15 | 298.69 ± 6.84 | 301.21± 6.15 |
| 2 | 278.81± 9.13 | 259.45 ± 8.73 | 268.87 ± 6.50 | 259.19 ± 4.84 | |
| 4 | 254.87 ± 10.32 | 205.81 ± 10.09 a2 | 213.9 ± 5.79 a1 | 201.22 ± 6.49 a2 | |
| 6 | 214.44 ± 11.01 | 144.31± 11.38 a2 | 150.86 ± 8.81 a2 | 126.91± 9.81 a3 | |
| 8 | 186.57 ± 17.40 | 85.04 ± 8.72 a3 | 96.03 ± 9.23 a3 | 67.38 ± 8.47 a3 | |
| 10 | 156.22 ± 17.46 | 43.70 ± 6.69 a3 | 56.00 ± 8.15 a3 | 27.74 ± 6.98 a3 | |
| 12 | 120.24 ± 19.51 | 19.63 ± 5.73 a3 | 27.09 ± 8.02 a3 | 7.07 ± 3.18 a3 | |
| 14 | 107.02 ± 18.87 | 5.63 ± 3.14 a3 | 11.12 ± 5.52 a3 | 1.70 ± 1.19 a3 | |
| 16 | 85.31 ± 18.59 | 0.66 ± 0.51 a3 | 2.49 ± 3.56 a3 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a3 | |
| 18 | 68.04 ± 16.99 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a3 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a3 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a3 |
Note: SO, simple ointment base; CEO, crude extract ointment; NF, nitrofurazone; n = 6 animals in each group. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), one-way ANOVA. aAgainst negative control, 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.01, and 3P < 0.001.
Effect of topical application of the 80% methanolic extract ointment of A. polystachyus on the period of epithelialization of infected wound model in mice.
| Treatment groups | Period of epithelialization (days) |
|---|---|
| Simple ointment base | FR |
| Nitrofurazone (0.2 % w/w) | 16.17 ± 1.83 a3 |
| 5% crude extract ointment (w/w) | 17.00 ± 0.86 a3 |
| 10% crude extract ointment (w/w) | 14.17 ± 1.17 a3c1 |
Note: FR: failed to reepithelize. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), one-way ANOVA. aCompared to negative control (simple ointment); ccompared to 5% ointment; 1P < 0.05 and 3P < 0.001.
Effect of topical application of the 80% methanolic crude extract ointment of A. polystachyus leaveson tensile strength of incision wound model in mice.
| Treatment group | Tensile strength (g) | % tensile strength |
|---|---|---|
| Simple ointment | 197.00 ± 5.25 | _ |
| Nitrofurazone (0.2%) | 261.33 ± 5.89 a3 | 31.22 |
| 5% crude extract ointment | 258.50 ± 7.21 a3 | 32.65 |
| 10% crude extract ointment | 267.50 ± 7.61 a3 | 35.79 |
Note: values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), one-way ANOVA. aCompared to negative (simple ointment) control; 3P < 0.001, when compared to control group, one-way ANOVA.
|
|
|
|
| Wool fat………………………………… | 50 g | 10g |
| Hard paraffin…………………………… | 50 g | 10g |
| White soft paraffin……………………… | 850g | 170g |
| Cetostearyl alcohol……………………… | 50g | 10g |
|
|
|