Hoda Hatoum1, Jennifer Dollery2, Scott M Lilly3, Juan Crestanello2, Lakshmi Prasad Dasi4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 2. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: lakshmi.dasi@osumc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to evaluate how sinus flow patterns after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in realistic representative patient roots vary. Sinus flow can affect transcatheter aortic valve operation and likely leaflet thrombosis occurrence due to stasis and poor washout. How the interaction between transcatheter aortic valve and representative patient aortic roots affects sinus hemodynamics is important to establish for future individualization of transcatheter aortic valve replacement therapy. METHODS: Two representative patient aortic roots were selected, segmented and 3-dimensional printed followed by deployment of Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic Inc, Irvine, Calif) and Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine Calif) transcatheter aortic valves. Sinus hemodynamics were assessed in vitro using high spatio-temporal resolution particle-image-velocimetry. Detailed sinus vortex tracking, shear stress probability density functions, and sinus washout were evaluated and assessed as a function of valve type and representative patient morphology as independent case studies. RESULTS: Peak velocity in the sinus with SAPIEN valve was approximately 3 times higher than with CoreValve for both models (0.30 ± 0.02 m/s and 0.34 ± 0.041 m/s vs 0.13 ± 0.01 m/s and 0.10 ± 0.02 m/s) (P < .01). Between representative patient models, vorticity magnitudes were significantly different (75 ± 1.1 s-1, 77 ± 3.2 s-1, 109 ± 2.3 s-1, and 250 ± 4.1 s-1) (P < .01) regardless of valve type. Sinus blood washout characteristic as a function of cardiac cycles was strongly both patient related and valve specific. Fluid dynamics favored shear stresses and washout characteristics due to a smaller sinus and sinotubular junction, further amplified by the SAPIEN valve. CONCLUSIONS: Sinus flow dynamics are highly sensitive to aortic root characteristics and transcatheter aortic valve aortic root interaction. Differences in sinus-flow washout and stasis regions between representative patient models may be reflected in different risks of leaflet thrombosis or valve degeneration.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to evaluate how sinus flow patterns after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in realistic representative patient roots vary. Sinus flow can affect transcatheter aortic valve operation and likely leaflet thrombosis occurrence due to stasis and poor washout. How the interaction between transcatheter aortic valve and representative patient aortic roots affects sinus hemodynamics is important to establish for future individualization of transcatheter aortic valve replacement therapy. METHODS: Two representative patient aortic roots were selected, segmented and 3-dimensional printed followed by deployment of Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic Inc, Irvine, Calif) and Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine Calif) transcatheter aortic valves. Sinus hemodynamics were assessed in vitro using high spatio-temporal resolution particle-image-velocimetry. Detailed sinus vortex tracking, shear stress probability density functions, and sinus washout were evaluated and assessed as a function of valve type and representative patient morphology as independent case studies. RESULTS: Peak velocity in the sinus with SAPIEN valve was approximately 3 times higher than with CoreValve for both models (0.30 ± 0.02 m/s and 0.34 ± 0.041 m/s vs 0.13 ± 0.01 m/s and 0.10 ± 0.02 m/s) (P < .01). Between representative patient models, vorticity magnitudes were significantly different (75 ± 1.1 s-1, 77 ± 3.2 s-1, 109 ± 2.3 s-1, and 250 ± 4.1 s-1) (P < .01) regardless of valve type. Sinus blood washout characteristic as a function of cardiac cycles was strongly both patient related and valve specific. Fluid dynamics favored shear stresses and washout characteristics due to a smaller sinus and sinotubular junction, further amplified by the SAPIEN valve. CONCLUSIONS: Sinus flow dynamics are highly sensitive to aortic root characteristics and transcatheter aortic valve aortic root interaction. Differences in sinus-flow washout and stasis regions between representative patient models may be reflected in different risks of leaflet thrombosis or valve degeneration.
Authors: Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Choon-Hwai Yap; Nicole C Milligan; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Tarun Chakravarty; Lars Søndergaard; John Friedman; Ole De Backer; Daniel Berman; Klaus F Kofoed; Hasan Jilaihawi; Takahiro Shiota; Yigal Abramowitz; Troels H Jørgensen; Tanya Rami; Sharjeel Israr; Gregory Fontana; Martina de Knegt; Andreas Fuchs; Patrick Lyden; Alfredo Trento; Deepak L Bhatt; Martin B Leon; Raj R Makkar Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-03-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sung-Han Yoon; Sabine Bleiziffer; Ole De Backer; Victoria Delgado; Takahide Arai; Johannes Ziegelmueller; Marco Barbanti; Rahul Sharma; Gidon Y Perlman; Omar K Khalique; Erik W Holy; Smriti Saraf; Florian Deuschl; Buntaro Fujita; Philipp Ruile; Franz-Josef Neumann; Gregor Pache; Masao Takahashi; Hidehiro Kaneko; Tobias Schmidt; Yohei Ohno; Niklas Schofer; William K F Kong; Edgar Tay; Daisuke Sugiyama; Hiroyuki Kawamori; Yoshio Maeno; Yigal Abramowitz; Tarun Chakravarty; Mamoo Nakamura; Shingo Kuwata; Gerald Yong; Hsien-Li Kao; Michael Lee; Hyo-Soo Kim; Thomas Modine; S Chiu Wong; Francesco Bedgoni; Luca Testa; Emmanuel Teiger; Christian Butter; Stephan M Ensminger; Ulrich Schaefer; Danny Dvir; Philipp Blanke; Jonathon Leipsic; Fabian Nietlispach; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab; Bernard Chevalier; Corrado Tamburino; David Hildick-Smith; Brian K Whisenant; Seung-Jung Park; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib; Susheel K Kodali; Jeroen J Bax; Lars Søndergaard; John G Webb; Thierry Lefèvre; Martin B Leon; Raj Makkar Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M H Wu; Y Kouchi; Y Onuki; Q Shi; H Yoshida; S Kaplan; R F Viggers; R Ghali; L R Sauvage Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Hoda Hatoum; Shelley Gooden; Megan Heitkemper; Kevin M Blum; Jason Zakko; Martin Bocks; Tai Yi; Yen-Lin Wu; Yadong Wang; Christopher K Breuer; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 3.934