Literature DB >> 29975756

Multiple cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents from a middle-income country: Prevalence and associated factors.

Thiago Veiga Jardim1,2,3, Thomas A Gaziano2,3, Flávia Miquetichuc Nascente1, Carolina de Souza Carneiro1, Polyana Morais1, Vanessa Roriz1, Karla Lorena Mendonça1, Thaís Inácio Rolim Póvoa1,4, Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso1, Ana Luiza Lima Sousa1, Paulo César Brandão Veiga Jardim1.   

Abstract

Multiple cardiovascular risk factors are directly related to the severity of atherosclerosis, even in children and adolescents. In this context accurate assessment of risk factors at the individual level play a decisive role in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, the frequency of their coexistence in individuals, and identify possible determinants associated with this coexistence in Brazilian adolescents. A cross-sectional study with 1170 students (12-17 years) from public and private schools of a large city was conducted. In addition to family history, modifiable cardiovascular risk factors were assessed including: tobacco use, alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, overweight/obesity, increased waist circumference, and high blood pressure (office and home). We built a linear regression model to identify determinants associated with increasing number of modifiable risk factors. Mean study population age was 14.7±1.6 years, 67% were enrolled in public schools and 33% in private ones. The majority of the adolescents had at least two risk factors (68.9%), more than 10% had more than 4 risk factors, and in only 6.7% of the sample no risk factor was identified. Family history of CVD (β-coefficient = 1.20; 95%CI 1.07-1.34; p<0.001), increasing age (β-coefficient = 0.08; 95%CI 0.04-0.11; p<0.001), and being enrolled in private schools (β-coefficient = 0.16; 95%CI 0.02-0.30; p = 0.023) were directly associated with the modifiable CV risk factors. In conclusion, the prevalence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors was high in the population of adolescents studied. School based interventions should be addressed to change this scenario.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29975756      PMCID: PMC6033431          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death worldwide and the burden of these diseases falls mainly on low and middle-income countries[1]. Projections show that deaths due to CVD will increase to approximately 23 million by 2030[2], when CVD will remain the leading cause of mortality. Cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyle and family history of CVD, are the underlying factors for most cardiovascular events[3]. It is well known that controlling classical modifiable risk factors can significantly decrease the prevalence of CVD therefore reducing its attributed mortality[4]. Unfortunately changes in childhood and adolescents habits are contributing to increase the rates of all traditional CVD risk factors[5]. Adolescence is a transition stage between childhood and adulthood and is an important phase of development of future lifestyle behaviours[6]. Cardiovascular risk factor prevalence in youth and adult life are highly correlated[7]. Further, there is a positive relation between number of cardiovascular risk factors and severity of atherosclerosis, even in children and young adults[8]. Therefore, a better comprehension of both presence and number of multiple risk factors in young people can significantly contribute to actions that may modify their natural history and prevent CVD onset[7]. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents has been studied in middle-income countries[9-12]. However no published data, to our knowledge, has assessed neither the multiple prevalence of these factors nor its related factors. Accordingly, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence and associated factors of cardiovascular risk factors among adolescents enrolled in public and private schools of a large city of the Midwest region of Brazil, with a particularly interest in the prevalence of multiple risk factors. The study rationale was that if modifiable cardiovascular risk factors could be identified in early stages of life, then potential public health policy and/or school-based interventions could be developed to reduce this increasingly common situation among adolescents.

Materials and methods

This school-based cross-sectional study was conducted with secondary school students (12–17 years) from both public and private schools in the city of Goiânia, within the state of Goiás, Brazil, in 2011. Goiânia has a population of 1,302,001 inhabitants and is located in the Midwest region of Brazil; its land area is 732.80 km2, and its population density is 1776.75 hab/km2 [13]. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Institution coordinating the project (Clinics Hospital–Federal University of Goias, protocol n° 017/2010). Both eligible adolescents, who agreed to participate in the study, and their guardians signed an informed consent form. Sample size was calculated for a main epidemiological project that aimed to assess white coat and masked hypertension in adolescents and its correlations with left ventricular mass index and insulin resistance[9]. This calculation considered a population of 133,528 students enrolled both in public and private schools of Goiânia[13], masked hypertension prevalence of 7%, white-coat hypertension prevalence of 10%, an absolute error of 3% and a confidence level of 95%. These parameters determined a sample size of 1059 students. A total of 1170 students were included, approximately 10% more than the estimated number, to cover eventual losses. A total of 132 public and private schools from the nine regions of the city were identified and the ratio of two public schools for each private one was established. After that, six public and three private schools from each region were drawn and then invited to participate. The school contact followed the drawing order. If a school did not agree to participate, the replacement was made by the same school type (public replaced by public and private replaced by private). At the end, 26 schools agreed to participate (17 public and nine private). Adolescents’ selection was performed by random drawing of the students enrolled in the institutions, stratified by age and sex[14]. The exclusion criteria were: physical disabilities that prevented the practice of physical activities (PA); pregnancy; disabling chronic diseases and use of continuous medication. Data was collected by a trained team over 13 months. The team consisted of four supervisors and nine data collectors (7 interviewers and 2 anthropometrists) who were students from Physical Therapy and Nutrition programs and had been previously trained. This study used a standardized questionnaire that included the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)[15], anthropometric measurements (height, weight and waist circumference) and blood pressure (BP) measurements. This questionnaire provided information about school type (public or private); adolescent identification (name, date of birth, age, sex, race/ethnicity: white or non-white, telephone number and address); personal history (current diseases and medications); family history of cardiovascular disease (any history of angina, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or necessity of revascularization in parents or grandparents); tobacco use, alcohol consumption and dietary habits. Office measurements were performed by trained health professionals, based on the Brazilian Hypertension Guidelines[16]. The procedure took place at the schools, on two different days (one-week interval) and with two measurements (with a three-minute interval) at each time point. For the analysis, the mean of the second set of measurements was used since it has shown a better correlation with home BP values in this population[17]. We utilized a semi-automatic equipment (OMRON, model HEM-705CP), which was validated to be used in adolescents[18]. Cuffs in three different sizes (9 x 16 cm, 13 x 23 cm and 15 x 30 cm) were selected according to the adolescent’s right arm circumference (80 to 100%). The same equipment, cuffs, and techniques used for the office measurements were also used for home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Adolescents received the device at school and were told to perform two measurements (with three-minute intervals) during the day (between 06:00 and 10:00 a.m.) and two at night (between 06:00 and 10:00 p.m.) over 6 days, for a total of 24 readings. Exams were consider valid if at least 50% (12 readings) were performed[19]. The overall mean value was used for this analysis. Hypertension was diagnosed in those adolescents who presented office and/or home BP measurements (systolic and/or diastolic) at or above the 95th percentile for the corresponding age, gender and height[14, 16], or those whit self-reported hypertension. The nutritional status of adolescents was assessed using body mass index (BMI = weight [kg] / height [m]2) which was classified according to the specific reference standard for the age and sex proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) (2007)[20]. The cut-off points for waist circumference (WC) were adjusted by age and sex according to international classifications[21], since there are no Brazilian data establishing the 90th percentile, adjusted for sex, as an indicator of metabolic changes. The short-form (Version 8) of the IPAQ was applied to estimate the prevalence of sedentary lifestyle, considering the PA practiced in the previous week as a reference[15]. The questions addressed the frequencies and durations of light (walking), moderate, and vigorous PA. Sedentary lifestyle was defined as less than 300 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity per week[22]. Regarding alcohol consumption adolescents were asked if they had any alcohol consumption in the last 30 days and the positive answers were defined as alcohol consumption. Smoking was assessed by self-report of having smoked at least one day over the previous 30 days. Modifiable CV risk factors were defined as: hypertension, overweight (BMI ≥ 85th percentile for a given age and sex), increased WC (≥90th percentile for age and sex), smoking, alcohol consumption and sedentary lifestyle. Non-modifiable risk factor was defined as family history of CVD. Data were entered in duplicate in Epiinfo 3.5.1 software. Variables were analysed using the software Stata 14.0. Population descriptive analysis with mean values and standard deviation of continuous variables was performed. Pearson’s Chi-square Test was used to evaluate the differences between sexes. Cardiovascular risk factors prevalence was calculated with their 95% confidence interval. Comparison between proportions was performed with a two-sample proportion test. A linear regression model was built to identify factors associated with the number of existing modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. The predictors included in this model were sex, age, school type, race/ethnicity and family history of cardiovascular disease. The results are presented using β-coefficients and 95% confidence intervals. A significance level was set as 5%.

Results

A total of 1170 students enrolled in public (67%) and private (33%) schools were evaluated. The mean age of the population was 14.7 (±1.6) years with no differences between sexes. No BMI difference was observed between sexes as well. Mean office blood pressure was 112.3±12.7 x 66.5±8.1 mmHg and mean home blood pressure was 112.9±10.3 x 66.6±6.6 mmHg, and both of them were higher among males. Clinical characteristics of these participants are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Population overall characteristics with sex stratification.

IndicatorOverall MaleFemale
nMean (±SD)nMean (±SD)nMean (±SD)p-value*
Age (years)1,17014.7±1.654914.7±1.662114.7±1.60.691
Weight (kg)1,16957.3±13.454861.2±14.462153.8±11.3<0.001
Height (m)1,1691.65±0.915481.70±0.946211.61±0.66<0.001
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)1,16920.7±3.854821.0±3.862120.5±3.70.062
Waist Circumference (cm)1,16870.8±9.154772.9±9.462169.0±8.3<0.001
Mean office SBPa (mmHg)1,023112.3±12.7487117.5±13.1536107.7±10.4<0.001
Mean office DBPb (mmHg)1,02366.5±8.148767.2±8.453665.9±7.80.013
Mean home SBPc (mmHg)1025112.9±10.3487116.9±10.1538109.2±9.1<0.001
Mean home DBPd (mmHg)102566.6±6.648767.3±6.953866.0±6.30.003
Heart rate (bpm)1,16178.9±11.854176.2±11.562081.3±11.6<0.001
Birth weight (g)8263275.9±596.03563331.0±626.04703234.2±569.40.020

a. Mean systolic blood pressure values of second measurements in different moments (one week apart)

b. Mean diastolic blood pressure values of second measurements in different moments (one week apart)

c. Mean systolic blood pressure values of all home blood pressure measurements.

d. Mean systolic blood pressure values of all home blood pressure measurements.

*Difference between male and female—Statistically significant at α = 0.05

a. Mean systolic blood pressure values of second measurements in different moments (one week apart) b. Mean diastolic blood pressure values of second measurements in different moments (one week apart) c. Mean systolic blood pressure values of all home blood pressure measurements. d. Mean systolic blood pressure values of all home blood pressure measurements. *Difference between male and female—Statistically significant at α = 0.05 Cardiovascular risk factors prevalence assessed in this group of adolescents is presented in Table 2. Sedentary lifestyle prevalence was extremely high in the overall population and female adolescents were more likely sedentary than males. Alcohol consumption was also highly prevalent and more common in female sex. On the other hand, hypertension and overweight were more prevalent in male adolescents.
Table 2

Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the overall study population and stratified by sex.

OverallMaleFemale
nn (%)nn (%)nn (%)p-value*
Hypertensiona1,025118 (11.5)49276 (15.4)53342 (7.9)<0.001
Overweightb1,169272 (23.3)548159 (29.0)621113 (18.2)<0.001
Increased WCc1,16840 (3.4)54719 (3.5)62121 (3.4)0.931
Smokingd1,17015 (1.3)5498 (1.4)6217 (1.1)0.617
Alcohol consumptione1,170730 (62.4)549323 (58.8)621408 (65.5)0.018
Sedentary lifestylef1,165822 (70.6)548326 (59.5)617496 (80.4)<0.001
CVD family historyg1,170423 (36.1)549186 (33.9)621237 (38.2)0.128

a. Office blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile or home blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile.

b. Body mass index ≥ 85th percentile.

c. Waist circumference ≥ 90th percentile.

d. Smoked at least one day over the previous 30 days.

e. Alcohol consumption in the last 30 days.

f. Less than 300 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity in the last week.

g. Cardiovascular disease in parents or grandparents.

*Difference between male and female—Statistically significant at α = 0.05

a. Office blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile or home blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile. b. Body mass index ≥ 85th percentile. c. Waist circumference ≥ 90th percentile. d. Smoked at least one day over the previous 30 days. e. Alcohol consumption in the last 30 days. f. Less than 300 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity in the last week. g. Cardiovascular disease in parents or grandparents. *Difference between male and female—Statistically significant at α = 0.05 When the prevalence of the modifiable risk factors was compared between public and private schools the rates of overweight were higher in public schools while sedentary lifestyle was more common in private schools. There were no other significant differences between the groups with regards to the remaining modifiable risk factors, as shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Prevalence of modifiable risk factors by public and private schools.

PublicSchoolsPrivateSchools
%95% CI%95% CIp-value*
Hypertensiona12.69.9–15.310.97.2–14.50.459
Overweightb31.426.8–36.119.316.5–22.0<0.001
Increased WCc2.81.6–4.04.72.6–6.80.100
Smokingd1.50.7–2.40.70.09–1.60.283
Alcohol consumptione60.857.4–64.265.460.7–70.20.126
Sedentary lifestylef68.665.3–71.874.770.4–79.10.030

a. Office blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile or home blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile.

b. Body mass index ≥ 85th percentile.

c. Waist circumference ≥ 90th percentile.

d. Smoked at least one day over the previous 30 days.

e. Alcohol consumption in the last 30 days.

f. Less than 300 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity in the last week.

*Statistically significant at α = 0.05

a. Office blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile or home blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile. b. Body mass index ≥ 85th percentile. c. Waist circumference ≥ 90th percentile. d. Smoked at least one day over the previous 30 days. e. Alcohol consumption in the last 30 days. f. Less than 300 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity in the last week. *Statistically significant at α = 0.05 Most adolescents had at least two risk factors (68.9%) and more than ten percent had more than 4 risk factors. In only 6.7% of the sample no cardiovascular risk factor was identified (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Sample distribution by number of cardiovascular risk factorsa (n = 1025).

a. Hypertension—Office blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile or home blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile, overweight—Body mass index ≥ 85th percentile; increased waist circumference—waist circumference ≥ 90th percentile; smoking—smoked at least one day over the previous 30 day; alcohol consumption–alcohol consumption in the last 30 days; sedentary lifestyle—less than 300 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity in the last week; family history of cardiovascular disease. *Difference between male and female—Statistically significant at α = 0.05.

Sample distribution by number of cardiovascular risk factorsa (n = 1025).

a. Hypertension—Office blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile or home blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile, overweight—Body mass index ≥ 85th percentile; increased waist circumference—waist circumference ≥ 90th percentile; smoking—smoked at least one day over the previous 30 day; alcohol consumption–alcohol consumption in the last 30 days; sedentary lifestyle—less than 300 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity in the last week; family history of cardiovascular disease. *Difference between male and female—Statistically significant at α = 0.05. Family history of CVD, increasing age, and being enrolled in private schools were directly associated with the number of modifiable CV risk factors, as shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Linear regression coefficients for the number of existing modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.

Variablesβ-coefficient[95% CI]p-value*
CVD family historya1.201.07–1.34<0.001
Age0.080.04–0.11<0.001
Private school0.160.02–0.300.023
Male sex-0.10-0.22–0.030.131
Race/ethnicity (White)-0.07-0.20–0.050.272

a. Cardiovascular disease in parents or grandparents.

*Statistically significant at α = 0.05

a. Cardiovascular disease in parents or grandparents. *Statistically significant at α = 0.05

Discussion

This study was conducted in the Midwest region of Brazil with a representative sample of students aged 12–17 years from public and private schools assessing the prevalence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors and its related factors. The overall prevalence of some cardiovascular risk factors such as alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, family history of cardiovascular disease, overweight and hypertension was high considering such a young population. Even more concerning was the assessment of multiple cardiovascular risk factors in which most of the adolescents had at least two risk factors (68.9%) and more than 10% had more than four. Adolescents from public schools, older and with a family history of CVD were more likely to have a higher number of modifiable CV risk factors. The sample characteristics, described in table 1, were very similar to the overall characteristics of adolescents living in this part of the country, and even in other parts like the South and Southwest regions[12, 23]. As shown in previously epidemiological studies[12] and population surveys[23], at this age group the mean weight, height and waist circumference of males is higher than females. These differences were not seen in BMI mean values. Another point leading to the same conclusion is the mean age of the population (14.7 years). It was exactly the same as a national school-based study conducted in Brazilian adolescents[24]. It suggests that the sampling methodology was adequate and should be consider in future school-based studies. The prevalence of the seven cardiovascular risk factors assessed was very distinct. The most prevalent conditions were sedentary lifestyle, alcohol consumption, family history of cardiovascular disease and overweight. Since family history of cardiovascular disease is a non-modifiable risk factor and there is not much to be done to change its high prevalence, this result must be seen as an alert, since it increases the cumulative risk of these adolescents. High prevalence of sedentary lifestyle must be addressed both locally and at the policy level. These high rates of physical inactivity at younger ages were found all over the world[25]. We found an even higher prevalence among females and students from private schools. This female pattern is frequent[26, 27] and interventions to change this reality in girls must be implemented at even younger ages. Alcohol consumption may not be considered a traditional risk factor[28], even though reduction of alcohol consumption, even for light to moderate drinkers, is beneficial for cardiovascular health[29]. In adolescents, alcohol consumption is usually related to binge intake, which has been associated with higher levels of alcoholism in adulthood [6], a number of diseases and unsafe behaviours [30]. Our prevalence was high (62.4%), and higher than international (34.9%) [30] and national data (21–23%)[24, 31]. Maybe the definition used that considered any alcohol intake in the last 30 days can explain such difference. Nevertheless, raising the attention to such an important point as adolescents’ alcohol consumption can only be beneficial. Overweight and increased waist circumference prevalence were 23.3% and 3.4% respectively, and were similar to recently published Brazilian data (25% and 3.3%, respectively)[12, 32]. If the prevalence of overweight was higher among male adolescents the opposite was seen for increased waist circumference. It can be explained by the age of our population and the different patterns of changes in waist circumference between boys and girls throughout time. Mean waist circumference increased with age in both sexes, but for girls, curves began to plateau after the age of 13 years whereas, for boys, waist percentile curves continued to increase more sharply after this age[33]. Another difference found was the higher prevalence of overweight in students from public schools. Considering the increased risk of cardiovascular abnormalities related to long-term exposure to excessive adiposity[34] and the strong correlation of overweight in younger ages with older ages[7] it is strongly recommended to implement interventions to change this reality even before adolescence with a particularly attention to students from public schools. The prevalence of hypertension reported in this study (11.5%) is slightly higher than previously published data from Brazilian adolescents (8.1–9.6%) [32, 35] but similar to results from the same part of the country (Midwest region) (11.7%) [36]. When compared to data from different countries (11.2%)[37], the results are concordant. Another similarity is related to the higher prevalence in males when compared to females, which is repeatedly shown in similar studies[32, 35–37]. Currently smoking habit among the population of our study was very low (1.3%) and lower than the usually reported Brazilian adolescent’s prevalence (5.7% to 6.1%) [11, 38]. Maybe the methodology used in which adolescents needed to report to an interviewer their smoking habit can explain the difference, since at younger ages such a methodology can underestimate the real smoking prevalence[39]. When the cumulative number of risk factors was assessed the prevalence of subjects with at least two risk factors was extremely high among our population and even higher than results from high income countries[40, 41]. Even more concerning is that approximately 10% of the adolescents included had more than 4 risk factors in such young ages, which is also higher than the results from a high income country sample[41]. It is well known that the number of cardiovascular risk factors are directly associated to the severity of atherosclerosis, even in children and young adults, as shown by an autopsy-based study published by the Bogalusa Heart Study group in 1998[8]. Since our results indicate that adolescents from middle-income countries are being exposed to multiple cardiovascular risk factors this situation will lead, if nothing changes, to a high number of cardiovascular outcomes in the future, maintaining the high burden of CVD in the developing world into the next generation[1]. The inclusion of adolescents who were enrolled in schools, excluding those out of school is a potential limitation of this study, particularly in Brazil, where the rates of adolescents not attending school are high (approximately 9%)[13]. The same methodology was used in previously published studies from other parts of the world [6, 34], and can be justified by the easy access to adolescents enrolled in schools as well as the easier implementation of interventions in these populations. From a health policy perspective our results must be seen as an alert and a call for changes in the way cardiovascular risk factors are handled. Although our linear regression model showed that family history of CVD, increasing age, and being enrolled in private schools were directly associated with the number of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, interventions to decrease this number should be addressed to all adolescents. Effective school-based interventions are required for middle-income countries if we want to see positive and real changes in the global burden of cardiovascular diseases.

Conclusion

The prevalence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors was high in the population of adolescents studied. In most of the sample at least two risk factors could be detected while more than 10% had four risk factors or more. Adolescents from public schools, older and with a family history of cardiovascular disease were more likely to have a higher number of modifiable CV risk factors. School based interventions should be addressed to change this scenario. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  37 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular risk in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Christopher Prendergast; Samuel S Gidding
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Chronic non-communicable diseases in Brazil: burden and current challenges.

Authors:  Maria Inês Schmidt; Bruce Bartholow Duncan; Gulnar Azevedo e Silva; Ana Maria Menezes; Carlos Augusto Monteiro; Sandhi Maria Barreto; Dora Chor; Paulo Rossi Menezes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Stephen S Lim; Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Goodarz Danaei; Kenji Shibuya; Heather Adair-Rohani; Markus Amann; H Ross Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Martin Aryee; Charles Atkinson; Loraine J Bacchus; Adil N Bahalim; Kalpana Balakrishnan; John Balmes; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Carissa Bonner; Guilherme Borges; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Michael Brauer; Peter Brooks; Nigel G Bruce; Bert Brunekreef; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Fiona Bull; Richard T Burnett; Tim E Byers; Bianca Calabria; Jonathan Carapetis; Emily Carnahan; Zoe Chafe; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Jian Shen Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; Jennifer Christine Child; Aaron Cohen; K Ellicott Colson; Benjamin C Cowie; Sarah Darby; Susan Darling; Adrian Davis; Louisa Degenhardt; Frank Dentener; Don C Des Jarlais; Karen Devries; Mukesh Dherani; Eric L Ding; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Karen Edmond; Suad Eltahir Ali; Rebecca E Engell; Patricia J Erwin; Saman Fahimi; Gail Falder; Farshad Farzadfar; Alize Ferrari; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Greg Freedman; Michael K Freeman; Emmanuela Gakidou; Santu Ghosh; Edward Giovannucci; Gerhard Gmel; Kathryn Graham; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; David Gunnell; Hialy R Gutierrez; Wayne Hall; Hans W Hoek; Anthony Hogan; H Dean Hosgood; Damian Hoy; Howard Hu; Bryan J Hubbell; Sally J Hutchings; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Gemma L Jacklyn; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Jost B Jonas; Haidong Kan; John A Kanis; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Young-Ho Khang; Shahab Khatibzadeh; Jon-Paul Khoo; Cindy Kok; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Qing Lan; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; James Leigh; Yang Li; John Kent Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Stephanie London; Rafael Lozano; Yuan Lu; Joelle Mak; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; Robin Marks; Randall Martin; Paul McGale; John McGrath; Sumi Mehta; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Renata Micha; Catherine Michaud; Vinod Mishra; Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah; Ali A Mokdad; Lidia Morawska; Dariush Mozaffarian; Tasha Murphy; Mohsen Naghavi; Bruce Neal; Paul K Nelson; Joan Miquel Nolla; Rosana Norman; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Jessica Orchard; Richard Osborne; Bart Ostro; Andrew Page; Kiran D Pandey; Charles D H Parry; Erin Passmore; Jayadeep Patra; Neil Pearce; Pamela M Pelizzari; Max Petzold; Michael R Phillips; Dan Pope; C Arden Pope; John Powles; Mayuree Rao; Homie Razavi; Eva A Rehfuess; Jürgen T Rehm; Beate Ritz; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Jose A Rodriguez-Portales; Isabelle Romieu; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Ananya Roy; Lesley Rushton; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; Amir Sapkota; Soraya Seedat; Peilin Shi; Kevin Shield; Rupak Shivakoti; Gitanjali M Singh; David A Sleet; Emma Smith; Kirk R Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Kyle Steenland; Heidi Stöckl; Lars Jacob Stovner; Kurt Straif; Lahn Straney; George D Thurston; Jimmy H Tran; Rita Van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; J Lennert Veerman; Lakshmi Vijayakumar; Robert Weintraub; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Warwick Williams; Nicholas Wilson; Anthony D Woolf; Paul Yip; Jan M Zielinski; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  G S Berenson; S R Srinivasan; W Bao; W P Newman; R E Tracy; W A Wattigney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).

Authors:  Massimo F Piepoli; Arno W Hoes; Stefan Agewall; Christian Albus; Carlos Brotons; Alberico L Catapano; Marie-Therese Cooney; Ugo Corrà; Bernard Cosyns; Christi Deaton; Ian Graham; Michael Stephen Hall; F D Richard Hobbs; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Herbert Löllgen; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Joep Perk; Eva Prescott; Josep Redon; Dimitrios J Richter; Naveed Sattar; Yvo Smulders; Monica Tiberi; H Bart van der Worp; Ineke van Dis; W M Monique Verschuren; Simone Binno
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Home blood pressure normalcy in non-European adolescents.

Authors:  Thiago V Jardim; Carolina de Souza Carneiro; Polyana Morais; Karla L Mendonça; Thaís I R Póvoa; Flávia M Nascente; Vanessa Roriz; Weimar K S Barroso; Ana L L Sousa; Paulo C V Jardim
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 7.  Prevalence of high blood pressure in 122,053 adolescents: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Augusto César Ferreira de Moraes; Maria Beatriz Lacerda; Luis A Moreno; Bernardo L Horta; Heráclito Barbosa Carvalho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Prevalence of arterial hypertension among Brazilian adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erika Silva Magliano; Luciane Gaspar Guedes; Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho; Katia Vergetti Bloch
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  ERICA: leisure-time physical inactivity in Brazilian adolescents.

Authors:  Felipe Vogt Cureau; Thiago Luiz Nogueira da Silva; Katia Vergetti Bloch; Elizabeth Fujimori; Dilson Rodrigues Belfort; Kênia Mara Baiocchi de Carvalho; Elisa Brosina de Leon; Mauricio Teixeira Leite de Vasconcellos; Ulf Ekelund; Beatriz D Schaan
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  ERICA: patterns of alcohol consumption in Brazilian adolescents.

Authors:  Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho; Debora França-Santos; Erika da Silva Magliano; Katia Vergetti Bloch; Laura Augusta Barufaldi; Cristiane de Freitas Cunha; Maurício Teixeira Leite de Vasconcellos; Moyses Szklo
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.106

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of structured interventional strategy for middle-aged adolescence (SISMA-PA) for preventing atherosclerotic risk factors-A study protocol.

Authors:  Gomathi Munusamy; Ramesh Shanmugam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Overweight, the Cardiovascular Risk of the Century.

Authors:  Paulo César B Veiga Jardim
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Hypertension in adolescents: The role of obesity and family history.

Authors:  Weiying Zhao; Luxia Mo; Yusheng Pang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Coexistence of risk factors for cardiovascular diseases among Brazilian adolescents: Individual characteristics and school environment.

Authors:  Thales Philipe Rodrigues da Silva; Fernanda Penido Matozinhos; Lucia Helena Almeida Gratão; Luana Lara Rocha; Luisa Arantes Vilela; Tatiana Resende Prado Rangel de Oliveira; Cristiane de Freitas Cunha; Larissa Loures Mendes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.