BACKGROUND: It is presumed that physical activity (PA) level declines during the lifespan, particularly in adolescence. However, currently, there is no study that quantifies these changes and pools results for a common interpretation. Therefore, the purpose was to systematically review the international literature regarding PA change during adolescence, and to quantify that change according to a series of study variables, exploring gender-and-age differences. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Longitudinal studies with, at least, two PA measures throughout adolescence (10-19 years old) or the first PA measure during childhood and the second one during adolescence were selected. From each article, study project name, country, year of the first data collection, sample size, baseline age, follow-up duration, characteristics of the instrument (type, recall time, PA intensity and PA domain), unit of PA measure and report of statistical significance were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies matched the inclusion criteria. Most were carried out in the USA, assessed PA by questionnaire, and found a decline in PA levels during the adolescence. On average, the mean percentage PA change per year, across all studies, was -7.0 (95% confidence interval: -8.8 to -5.2), ranging from -18.8 to 7.8. The decline was significant according to most sub-groups of variables analysed. Although earlier studies revealed a higher PA decline in boys, the decline has been greater in girls in more recent studies (commenced after 1997). Moreover, although the decline among girls was higher in younger ages at baseline (9-12 years), it was higher in older ages (13-16 years) among boys. CONCLUSIONS: The decline of PA during adolescence is a consistent finding in the literature. Differences between boys and girls were observed and should be explored in future studies. Interventions that attempt to attenuate the PA decline, even without an increase in PA levels, could be considered as effective.
BACKGROUND: It is presumed that physical activity (PA) level declines during the lifespan, particularly in adolescence. However, currently, there is no study that quantifies these changes and pools results for a common interpretation. Therefore, the purpose was to systematically review the international literature regarding PA change during adolescence, and to quantify that change according to a series of study variables, exploring gender-and-age differences. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Longitudinal studies with, at least, two PA measures throughout adolescence (10-19 years old) or the first PA measure during childhood and the second one during adolescence were selected. From each article, study project name, country, year of the first data collection, sample size, baseline age, follow-up duration, characteristics of the instrument (type, recall time, PA intensity and PA domain), unit of PA measure and report of statistical significance were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies matched the inclusion criteria. Most were carried out in the USA, assessed PA by questionnaire, and found a decline in PA levels during the adolescence. On average, the mean percentage PA change per year, across all studies, was -7.0 (95% confidence interval: -8.8 to -5.2), ranging from -18.8 to 7.8. The decline was significant according to most sub-groups of variables analysed. Although earlier studies revealed a higher PA decline in boys, the decline has been greater in girls in more recent studies (commenced after 1997). Moreover, although the decline among girls was higher in younger ages at baseline (9-12 years), it was higher in older ages (13-16 years) among boys. CONCLUSIONS: The decline of PA during adolescence is a consistent finding in the literature. Differences between boys and girls were observed and should be explored in future studies. Interventions that attempt to attenuate the PA decline, even without an increase in PA levels, could be considered as effective.
Authors: Shari L Barkin; Archana P Lamichhane; Jorge A Banda; Meghan M JaKa; Maciej S Buchowski; Kelly R Evenson; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Charlotte Pratt; Simone A French; June Stevens Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Emma C Perez; Diana R Bravo; Shaefali P Rodgers; Ali R Khan; J Leigh Leasure Journal: Int J Dev Neurosci Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.457
Authors: Katrina D DuBose; Andrew J McKune; Patricia Brophy; Gabriel Geyer; Robert C Hickner Journal: Pediatr Exerc Sci Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: Megan S Gietzen; Sarah E Gollust; Jennifer A Linde; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Marla E Eisenberg Journal: Res Q Exerc Sport Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Ryan M Hulteen; Natalie J Lander; Philip J Morgan; Lisa M Barnett; Samuel J Robertson; David R Lubans Journal: Sports Med Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: E Andrew Pitchford; Chelsea Adkins; Rebecca E Hasson; Joseph E Hornyak; Dale A Ulrich Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.411