Literature DB >> 20222106

Microarchitectural deterioration of cortical and trabecular bone: differing effects of denosumab and alendronate.

Ego Seeman1, Pierre D Delmas, David A Hanley, Deborah Sellmeyer, Angela M Cheung, Elizabeth Shane, Ann Kearns, Thierry Thomas, Steven K Boyd, Stephanie Boutroy, Cesar Bogado, Sharmila Majumdar, Michelle Fan, Cesar Libanati, Jose Zanchetta.   

Abstract

The intensity of bone remodeling is a critical determinant of the decay of cortical and trabecular microstructure after menopause. Denosumab suppresses remodeling more than alendronate, leading to greater gains in areal bone mineral density (aBMD). These greater gains may reflect differing effects of each drug on bone microarchitecture and strength. In a phase 2 double-blind pilot study, 247 postmenopausal women were randomized to denosumab (60 mg subcutaneous 6 monthly), alendronate (70 mg oral weekly), or placebo for 12 months. All received daily calcium and vitamin D. Morphologic changes were assessed using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at the distal radius and distal tibia and QCT at the distal radius. Denosumab decreased serum C-telopeptide more rapidly and markedly than alendronate. In the placebo arm, total, cortical, and trabecular BMD and cortical thickness decreased (-2.1% to -0.8%) at the distal radius after 12 months. Alendronate prevented the decline (-0.6% to 2.4%, p = .051 to <.001 versus placebo), whereas denosumab prevented the decline or improved these variables (0.3% to 3.4%, p < .001 versus placebo). Changes in total and cortical BMD were greater with denosumab than with alendronate (p < or = .024). Similar changes in these parameters were observed at the tibia. The polar moment of inertia also increased more in the denosumab than alendronate or placebo groups (p < .001). Adverse events did not differ by group. These data suggest that structural decay owing to bone remodeling and progression of bone fragility may be prevented more effectively with denosumab.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20222106      PMCID: PMC4445722          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  22 in total

1.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover, endogenous hormones and the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women: the OFELY study.

Authors:  P Garnero; E Sornay-Rendu; B Claustrat; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Cortical stability of the femoral neck and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  R M D Zebaze; E Seeman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Oct 29-Nov 4       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Relationship between changes in BMD and nonvertebral fracture incidence associated with risedronate: reduction in risk of nonvertebral fracture is not related to change in BMD.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; Piet Geusens; Ian P Barton; Dieter Felsenberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Stephanie Boutroy; Mary L Bouxsein; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearm.

Authors:  A Laib; H J Häuselmann; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.285

6.  Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women transitioning from alendronate therapy.

Authors:  David L Kendler; Christian Roux; Claude Laurent Benhamou; Jacques P Brown; Michael Lillestol; Suresh Siddhanti; Hoi-Shen Man; Javier San Martin; Henry G Bone
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Richard L Prince; Chad Deal; Robert R Recker; Douglas P Kiel; Luiz H de Gregorio; Peyman Hadji; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Jose M Alvaro-Gracia; Huei Wang; Matthew Austin; Rachel B Wagman; Richard Newmark; Cesar Libanati; Javier San Martin; Henry G Bone
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Effect of denosumab on bone density and turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass after long-term continued, discontinued, and restarting of therapy: a randomized blinded phase 2 clinical trial.

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Michael A Bolognese; E Michael Lewiecki; Michael R McClung; Beiying Ding; Matthew Austin; Yu Liu; Javier San Martin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  Mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: similarities and differences and their potential influence on clinical efficacy.

Authors:  R G G Russell; N B Watts; F H Ebetino; M J Rogers
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The components of excess mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; C De Laet; B Jonsson; A K Oglesby
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  97 in total

1.  Effect of oral monthly ibandronate on bone microarchitecture in women with osteopenia-a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; M Laroche; T Thomas; S Rouanet; P D Delmas; M-C de Vernejoul
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparing the structural effects of denosumab and alendronate.

Authors:  Sarah Price
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Estimation of in vivo cortical bone thickness using ultrasonic waves.

Authors:  Isao Mano; Kaoru Horii; Hiroshi Hagino; Takami Miki; Mami Matsukawa; Takahiko Otani
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Quantitative characterization of subject motion in HR-pQCT images of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  Miki Sode; Andrew J Burghardt; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Emerging therapeutic opportunities for skeletal restoration.

Authors:  Masanobu Kawai; Ulrike I Mödder; Sundeep Khosla; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Tadrous; L Wong; M M Mamdani; D N Juurlink; M D Krahn; L E Lévesque; S M Cadarette
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Postmenopausal women treated with combination parathyroid hormone (1-84) and ibandronate demonstrate different microstructural changes at the radius vs. tibia: the PTH and Ibandronate Combination Study (PICS).

Authors:  A L Schafer; A J Burghardt; D E Sellmeyer; L Palermo; D M Shoback; S Majumdar; D M Black
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Denosumab: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.