Literature DB >> 26141837

Comparison of proximal femur and vertebral body strength improvements in the FREEDOM trial using an alternative finite element methodology.

Philippe Zysset1, Dieter Pahr2, Klaus Engelke3, Harry K Genant4, Michael R McClung5, David L Kendler6, Christopher Recknor7, Michael Kinzl2, Jakob Schwiedrzik8, Oleg Museyko9, Andrea Wang10, Cesar Libanati10.   

Abstract

Denosumab reduced the incidence of new fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by 68% at the spine and 40% at the hip over 36 months compared with placebo in the FREEDOM study. This efficacy was supported by improvements from baseline in vertebral (18.2%) strength in axial compression and femoral (8.6%) strength in sideways fall configuration at 36 months, estimated in Newtons by an established voxel-based finite element (FE) methodology. Since FE analyses rely on the choice of meshes, material properties, and boundary conditions, the aim of this study was to independently confirm and compare the effects of denosumab on vertebral and femoral strength during the FREEDOM trial using an alternative smooth FE methodology. Unlike the previous FE study, effects on femoral strength in physiological stance configuration were also examined. QCT data for the proximal femur and two lumbar vertebrae were analyzed by smooth FE methodology at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months for 51 treated (denosumab) and 47 control (placebo) subjects. QCT images were segmented and converted into smooth FE models to compute bone strength. L1 and L2 vertebral bodies were virtually loaded in axial compression and the proximal femora in both fall and stance configurations. Denosumab increased vertebral body strength by 10.8%, 14.0%, and 17.4% from baseline at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Denosumab also increased femoral strength in the fall configuration by 4.3%, 5.1%, and 7.2% from baseline at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Similar improvements were observed in the stance configuration with increases of 4.2%, 5.2%, and 5.2% from baseline (p≤0.0007). Differences between the increasing strengths with denosumab and the decreasing strengths with placebo were significant starting at 12 months (vertebral and femoral fall) or 24 months (femoral stance). Using an alternative smooth FE methodology, we confirmed the significant improvements in vertebral body and proximal femur strength previously observed with denosumab. Estimated increases in strength with denosumab and decreases with placebo were highly consistent between both FE techniques.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denosumab; FEA; Proximal femur strength; QCT; Vertebral body strength

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26141837     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

Review 1.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Denosumab: A Review in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Effects of osteoporosis drug treatments on cortical and trabecular bone in the femur using DXA-based 3D modeling.

Authors:  R Winzenrieth; L Humbert; S Di Gregorio; E Bonel; M García; L Del Rio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Documenting the Anisotropic Stiffness of Hard Tissues with Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xiran Cai; Simon Bernard; Quentin Grimal
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; P Zysset; C C Glüer; M McClung; E Biver; D D Pierroz; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strength Clinically Useful?

Authors:  Marco Viceconti; Muhammad Qasim; Pinaki Bhattacharya; Xinshan Li
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  An experimentally informed statistical elasto-plastic mineralised collagen fibre model at the micrometre and nanometre lengthscale.

Authors:  Alexander Groetsch; Philippe K Zysset; Peter Varga; Alexandra Pacureanu; Françoise Peyrin; Uwe Wolfram
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; B L Clarke; F Cosman; E S Orwoll; E S Siris; S Khosla; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 5.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.