| Literature DB >> 29973274 |
Sara N Lundgren1, Juliette C Madan2,3, Jennifer A Emond4, Hilary G Morrison5, Brock C Christensen1,6,7, Margaret R Karagas1,3,7, Anne G Hoen8,9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome has an important role in infant health and immune development and may be affected by early-life exposures. Maternal diet may influence the infant gut microbiome through vertical transfer of maternal microbes to infants during vaginal delivery and breastfeeding. We aimed to examine the association of maternal diet during pregnancy with the infant gut microbiome 6 weeks post-delivery in mother-infant dyads enrolled in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study. Infant stool samples were collected from 145 infants, and maternal prenatal diet was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. We used targeted sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4-V5 hypervariable region to characterize infant gut microbiota. To account for differences in baseline and trajectories of infant gut microbial profiles, we stratified analyses by delivery mode.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Delivery mode; Fruit; Infant gut microbiome; Infant gut microbiome clusters; Maternal prenatal diet
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29973274 PMCID: PMC6033232 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0490-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Subject characteristics by delivery mode (n = 145)
| All ( | Vaginal ( | Cesarean ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal characteristics | ||||
| Maternal age | 31.9 [22–44] | 31.8 [22–44] | 32.2 [23–42] | 0.65 |
| Education level | 0.14 | |||
| Less than 11th grade | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| High school graduate or equivalent | 15 (10.3) | 7 (7.2) | 8 (16.7) | |
| Junior college graduate or some college | 25 (17.2) | 16 (16.5) | 9 (18.8) | |
| College graduate | 54 (37.2) | 34 (35.1) | 20 (41.7) | |
| Any post-graduate schooling | 50 (34.5) | 39 (40.2) | 11 (22.9) | |
| Relationship status | 0.29 | |||
| Married | 133 (91.7) | 91 (93.8) | 42 (87.5) | |
| Separated or divorced | 3 (2.1) | 1 (1.0) | 2 (4.2) | |
| Single and never married | 9 (6.2) | 5 (5.2) | 4 (8.3) | |
| Smoking | 0.43 | |||
| No | 138 (95.2) | 91 (93.8) | 47 (97.9) | |
| Yes | 7 (4.8) | 6 (6.2) | 1 (2.1) | |
| Parity | 0.8 [0–4] | 0.9 [0–4] | 0.7 [0–2] | 0.07 |
| Maternal BMI | 25.6 [17.4–47.8] | 26.0 [17.4–47.8] | 24.7 [18.4–42.1] | 0.22 |
| Gestational diabetes2 | 0.58 | |||
| No | 121 (83.4) | 84 (86.6) | 37 (77.1) | |
| Yes | 16 (11.0) | 10 (10.3) | 6 (12.5) | |
| Dietary factors (servings/day)3 | ||||
| aMED score | 3.67 [0–7] | 3.8 [0–7] | 3.5 [0–7] | 0.32 |
| Dairy | 3.6 [0.0–8.5] | 3.7 [0.0–8.5] | 3.5 [0.8–6.8] | 0.40 |
| Fruit | 2.3 [0.0–5.9] | 2.3 [0.2–5.9] | 2.2 [0.0–5.6] | 0.52 |
| Vegetables | 3.3 [0.0–9.6] | 3.3 [0.5–9.6] | 3.2 [0.0–7.6] | 0.78 |
| Whole grains | 1.0 [0.0–4.1] | 1.2 [0.1–4.1] | 0.9 [0.0–3.1] | 0.03 |
| Fish and seafood | 0.2 [0.0–1.0] | 0.2 [0.0–1.0] | 0.2 [0.0–0.6] | 0.56 |
| Nuts, legumes, and soy | 0.9 [0.0–4.5] | 0.9 [0.0–3.1] | 0.9 [0.0–4.5] | 1.00 |
| Red and processed meat | 0.8 [0.0–2.3] | 0.7 [0.0–2.0] | 0.8 [0.0–2.3] | 0.21 |
| Polyunsaturated fat (g/day) | 13.9 [8.67–23.7] | 13.6 [8.7–21.0] | 14.5 [9.2–23.7] | 0.12 |
| EPA (g/day) | 0.1 [0.0–0.5] | 0.1 [0.0–0.5] | 0.1 [0.0–0.5] | 0.28 |
| DHA (g/day) | 0.1 [0.0–0.6] | 0.1 [0.0–0.6] | 0.1 [0.0–0.5] | 0.79 |
| Monounsaturated:saturated fatty acid ratio | 1.1 [0.7–2.3] | 1.1 [0.7–2.1] | 1.2 [0.7–2.3] | 0.35 |
| Infant characteristics | ||||
| Sex | 0.38 | |||
| Female | 62 (42.8) | 44 (45.4) | 18 (37.5) | |
| Male | 83 (57.2) | 53 (54.6) | 30 (62.5) | |
| Birth weight (g)4 | 3427.4 [1960–4710] | 3466.3 [2030–4565] | 3348.9 [1960–4710] | 0.18 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 39.3 [30.4–43.4] | 39.5 [30.4–42.1] | 39.1 [33.4–43.4] | 0.21 |
| Feeding method | 0.04 | |||
| Exclusively breastfed | 102 (70.3) | 74 (76.3) | 28 (58.3) | |
| Combination | 37 (25.5) | 21 (21.7) | 16 (33.3) | |
| Exclusively formula fed | 6 (4.1) | 2 (2.1) | 4 (8.3) | |
| Antibiotics by 4 months old5 | 0.66 | |||
| No | 135 (93.1) | 91 (93.8) | 44 (91.7) | |
| Yes | 5 (3.5) | 3 (3.1) | 2 (4.2) | |
1p value determined by two-sided Welch’s t test or Fisher’s exact test
2Missing data on eight subjects
3All dietary factors are standardized to a 2000 cal/day diet, excluding aMED score and monounsaturated:saturated fatty acid ratio
4Missing data on three subjects
5Missing data on five subjects
Relation of microbial community composition in vaginally delivered 6-week old infants with maternal diet
| Dietary factor | All ( | Exclusively breastfed ( |
|---|---|---|
| aMED score | 0.19 | 0.26 |
| Dairy | 0.60 | 0.91 |
| Fruit | 0.028 | 0.022 |
| Vegetables | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| Whole grains | 0.47 | 0.25 |
| Fish and seafood | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| Nuts, legumes, and soy | 0.52 | 0.71 |
| Red and processed meat | 0.86 | 0.69 |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.76 | 0.84 |
| EPA | 0.29 | 0.45 |
| DHA | 0.40 | 0.50 |
| MUFA:SFA ratio | 0.66 | 0.43 |
1All p values are determined by PERMANOVA
2p values are adjusted for infant feeding method, maternal BMI, parity, and batch
3p values are adjusted for maternal BMI, parity, and batch
Fig. 1Associations between maternal diet and infant gut microbial communities in infants delivered vaginally. Plots include only infants delivered vaginally (n = 97). a Principal coordinate plot of generalized UniFrac distances (PERMANOVA p = 0.028 for maternal fruit intake as a continuous variable), colored by maternal fruit intake tertiles. Each point represents an individual, and lines indicate the distance from tertile centroid. b Predicted probability plot of infant stool cluster membership by maternal fruit intake during pregnancy from multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for infant feeding method, maternal BMI, parity, and batch. Cluster 1 is the reference group. c Linear model associations between maternal aMED score and relative abundance of infant stool OTUs. The size of each point indicates the log-ratio transformed relative abundance (LRTA) of each OTU (LRTA ≥ 30, LRTA ≥ 20, or LRTA < 20). Points are colored by taxonomy represented heavily in top results, for p < 0.10. F., G., and S. in taxonomy labels indicate that the level of taxonomy is family, genus, or species, respectively
Infant gut microbiome cluster is influenced by maternal diet
| OR (95% confidence interval)1, 2 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dietary factor | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 |
| aMED score | 1.31 (0.90, 1.89) | 0.96 (0.73, 1.27) |
| Dairy | 0.87 (0.56, 1.37) | 0.84 (0.59, 1.18) |
| Fruit | 2.73 (1.36, 5.46)3 | 1.61 (0.97, 2.68)3 |
| Vegetables | 0.88 (0.60, 1.28) | 0.82 (0.60, 1.11) |
| Whole grains | 0.94 (0.36, 2.41) | 1.10 (0.57, 2.13) |
| Fish and seafood | 0.67 (0.01, 32.26) | 0.50 (0.02, 12.57) |
| Nuts, legumes, and soy | 0.49 (0.20, 1.20) | 0.48 (0.24, 0.96) |
| Red and processed meat | 4.39 (0.82, 23.47) | 2.35 (0.62, 8.95) |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.84 (0.65, 1.09) | 0.87 (0.72, 1.06) |
| EPA | 0.24 (0.00, 72.57) | 4.13 (0.08, 217.72) |
| DHA | 0.15 (0.00, 62.82) | 2.66 (0.04, 158.91) |
| MUFA:SFA ratio | 1.64 (0.15, 17.73) | 1.78 (0.26, 12.28) |
1Models include vaginally delivered infants (n = 97)
2Cluster 1 is the reference group
3Corresponds to Fig. 1b
Fig. 2Associations between maternal diet and infant gut microbial communities in infants delivered vaginally. Plots include only infants delivered by Cesarean section (n = 48). a Principal coordinate plot of generalized UniFrac distances (PERMANOVA p = 0.034 for maternal dairy as a continuous variable), colored by maternal dairy intake tertiles. Each point represents an individual, and lines indicate the distance from tertile centroid. b Predicted probability plot of infant stool cluster membership by maternal dairy intake during pregnancy from multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for infant feeding method, maternal BMI, parity, and batch. Cluster 1 is the reference group. c Linear model associations between maternal aMED score and relative abundance of infant stool OTUs. The size of each point indicates the log-ratio transformed relative abundance (LRTA) of each OTU (LRTA ≥ 30, LRTA ≥ 20, or LRTA < 20). Red text indicates q < 0.10. Points are colored by taxonomy represented heavily in top results, for p < 0.10. F., G., and S. in taxonomy labels indicate that the level of taxonomy is family, genus, or species