Literature DB >> 25601913

Diversity and composition of the adult fecal microbiome associated with history of cesarean birth or appendectomy: Analysis of the American Gut Project.

James J Goedert1, Xing Hua1, Guoqin Yu1, Jianxin Shi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cesarean birth is associated with altered composition of the neonate's microbiota and with increased risk for obesity and other diseases later in life. The mechanisms of these associations, and whether cesarean birth is associated with an altered adult microbiota, are unknown.
METHODS: In 1097 adult volunteers without diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, or recent antibiotic use, fecal microbiome metrics were compared by history of cesarean birth (N=92) or appendectomy (N=115). Associations with potential confounders, microbiome alpha diversity, and individual microbial taxa were estimated by logistic regression. Permutation tests assessed differences in microbial composition (beta diversity) based on Jensen-Shannon divergence.
FINDINGS: Cesarean birth history was associated with younger age; appendectomy with older age and higher body mass index. Neither was associated with fecal microbiome alpha diversity. Microbial composition at all taxonomic levels differed significantly with cesarean birth (P≤0.008) but not with appendectomy (P≥0.29). Relative abundance differed nominally for 17 taxa with cesarean birth and for 22 taxa with appendectomy, none of which was significant with adjustment for multiple comparisons.
INTERPRETATION: Adults born by cesarean section appear to have a distinctly different composition of their fecal microbial population. Whether this distinction was acquired during birth, and whether it affects risk of disease during adulthood, are unknown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human microbiome; adults; appendectomy history; birth history; cesarean section; feces

Year:  2014        PMID: 25601913      PMCID: PMC4296728          DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2014.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EBioMedicine        ISSN: 2352-3964            Impact factor:   8.143


Introduction

Prenatal and early postnatal exposures and events can affect the entire life course. As one example, cesarean birth has been associated with an increased likelihood of asthma and cardiovascular disease in children (Renz-Polster et al., 2005, Thavagnanam et al., 2008, Friedemann et al., 2012), hypertension in young adults (Horta et al., 2013), and obesity in both children and adults (Pei et al., 2014, Darmasseelane et al., 2014, Blustein et al., 2013, Mueller et al., 2014). While these associations are certainly multifactorial, differences in the gut microbiota could contribute. As well summarized by Arrieta and colleagues, several studies have noted differences in the neonatal fecal microbiota by route of delivery (Arrieta et al., 2014). Using aerobic and anaerobic cultures, Adlerberth et al. found higher abundance of Escherichia coli and lower abundance of enterobacteria in 99 vaginally delivered compared 17 cesarean delivered newborns (Adlerberth et al., 2006). Biasucci et al. used PCR amplification of Bifidobacterium species as well as PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to find that 23 cesarean-delivered newborns had lower bacterial diversity and an absence of Bifidobacteria compared to 23 vaginally delivered newborns (Biasucci et al., 2008). Among 1032 infants studied at age 1 month, Penders and colleagues used polymerase chain reaction to quantify total bacteria and five bacterial taxa, finding that cesarean birth was associated with higher carriage of Clostridium difficile and lower abundance of Bacteroides and Bifidobacteria (Penders et al., 2006), thereby confirming Biasucci et al. (2008). More recently, with comprehensive analysis based on next generation sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, Dominguez-Bello and colleagues reported that route of delivery was associated with differences in the composition of the microbial populations that initially colonized the offspring. Notably, neonates who were born vaginally were colonized by vagina-associated bacteria, whereas those born by cesarean section were initially colonized by skin-associated bacteria (Dominguez-Bello et al., 2010). Early life alteration of the gut microbiota may have a lasting effect. Trasande et al. observed that exposure to antibiotics up to age 6 months was associated with elevated body mass index (BMI) up to age 7 years (Trasande et al., 2013). In a recently reported murine model, Cox and colleagues observed that prenatal and postnatal exposures to subtherapeutic doses of penicillin resulted in an alteration of the gut microbiota that was transient (Cox et al., 2014). However, the early life exposure to penicillin also caused prolonged metabolic alterations including exacerbated diet-induced obesity (Cox et al., 2014). These observations are consistent with studies in humans showing that the distal gut microbial population may have a major effect on the risks for obesity and malnutrition. Among American adults, the composition of the microbial population in feces is generally altered with obesity, with enrichment by taxa in the phylum Firmicutes (Turnbaugh et al., 2009). Conversely, Malawian infants and young children with Kwashiorkor also have an altered population of fecal microbes, without a clear taxonomic signature but with a disease phenotype that could be transmitted by transplantation of Kwashiorkor feces to gnotobiotic mice (Smith et al., 2013). Likewise, the penicillin-induced obesity phenotype in the mouse could be transferred by fecal transplantation (Cox et al., 2014). If cesarean delivery has a prolonged effect on the microbiota, this could contribute to the risk for metabolic diseases later in life. Herein, we explored whether the fecal microbiota differs between adults who reported that they were born by cesarean versus vaginal delivery. For comparison, in the same population we looked for differences in the fecal microbiota with history of appendectomy (Guinane et al., 2013, Randal Bollinger et al., 2007). The appendix, particularly its microbial-rich biofilm, has long been postulated to serve as a repository for repopulating the distal gut following an insult such as diarrheal disease or antibiotic exposure (Randal Bollinger et al., 2007). Whether and how this occurs is unknown, particularly in light of a recent observation that surgically removed appendices contained some taxa that are infrequently found in the distal gut (Guinane et al., 2013). In either case, removal of the appendix could result in a persistent alteration of the fecal microbiota.

Methods

The 16S rRNA V4 region was sequenced by the American Gut Project. The operational taxonomic unit (OTU) table rarefied to 10,000 sequence reads per sample, as well as metadata, was downloaded from the American Gut Project website (https://github.com/biocore/American-Gut/tree/master/data/AG). A current summary is available at http://microbio.me/AmericanGut/static/img/mod1_main.pdf, and details of the OTU picking and taxonomy assignment are available at http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/biocore/American-Gut/blob/master/ipynb/module2_v1.0.ipynb. Alpha diversity (number of OTUs, Shannon's index, Chao1, Phylogenetic diversity_whole tree), UniFrac distance matrix and relative abundance of different taxa were calculated in the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline.

Data Cleaning and Exclusions

In the full data set, there were 1962 samples, 174 phenotypic variables and 3599 taxa with relative abundance. Among those, 1134 samples were left after exclusions [age < 4 years (number removed, 121), sex missing (196), race missing (19), specimen not feces (393), used antibiotic in the past month (131), has diabetes (107) or inflammatory bowel disease (170)]. After that, 37 duplicated samples were also removed. The remaining 1097 samples were used for statistical analysis (1040 for cesarean associations, and 1076 for appendectomy associations).

Covariate Tests

We used logistic regression to test the association between history of cesarean birth (CSECTION in the data set) and the following variables: age, race/ethnicity, sex, geographic region, BMI, weight change, diet type, gluten sensitivity (GLUTEN), lactose intolerance (LACTOSE), asthma, and frequencies of smoking and alcohol consumption. The logistic regression was repeated with history of appendectomy (APPENDIX_REMOVED) as the dependent variable and the same dependent variables.

Alpha Diversity and Individual Taxa Tests

We used logistic regression to test associations of case status (cesarean birth or appendectomy) with richness, standard estimates of alpha diversity (Shannon, Chao 1, inverse Simpson, and phylogenetic distance whole tree indices) and each of the 1949 taxa in the 1097 samples, adjusting for age, sex and race/ethnicity. The Wald test was used to calculate P values as the primary test. Significance after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment for multiple comparisons was also considered.

Clustering Analysis and Testing

As used previously to define and test associations with clusters of the microbiome in the vagina (Gajer et al., 2012), our primary analysis was based on Jensen–Shannon (J–S) divergence at each taxonomic level from phylum down to species. For K taxa at a given level, let P = (p1, ⋯, p) denote the relative abundances for subject i. The Kullback–Leibler (K–L) divergence between subject i and j is defined as D(P|P) = ∑p log(p/p) with respect to the distribution of subject i. Since the K–L divergence is not symmetric, we calculated the J–S divergence as the distance between the pair (i,j), defined as JSD(P, P) = (D(P|Q) + D(P|Q))/2, where the vector Q = (P + P)/2 represents the average distribution of microbiome community i and j. Based on the J–S divergence matrix, we also performed hierarchical clustering. Based on the distance matrix, we performed permutation tests to investigate whether the case group (cesarean birth or appendectomy) was significantly clustered relative to the whole set of samples.

Role of the Funding Source

The funding source had no direct role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, or writing the report.

Results

Of the 1097 participants, cesarean birth was reported as “yes” by 92, “no” by 948, and missing or uncertain by 57. Likewise, appendectomy was reported as “yes” by 155, “no” by 961, and missing or uncertain by 21. Selected characteristics of the participants and associations with cesarean birth and appendectomy history are presented in Table 1. The population in the cesarean birth analysis was 44% male, 93% non-Hispanic Caucasian, and distributed through all U.S. regions. They had a mean age of 46 [standard error (SE) 16] years and a mean BMI of 24 (SE 5). An omnivorous diet was reported by 80%, gluten sensitivity by 19%, and lactose sensitivity by 18%. Weight loss of at least 10 lb was reported by 10% and weight gain by 5%. An antibiotic had been used by 11% 2–6 months and 13% 7–12 months before participation. Cesarean birth was significantly associated with younger age, but not consistently with any of the other characteristics. History of appendectomy was significantly associated with older age and with higher BMI, and it tended to be more frequent in U.S. states outside California. Without adjusting for age or any other characteristic, cesarean birth and appendectomy histories had a weak inverse association (P = 0.11).
Table 1

Selected characteristics of 1097 participants in the American Gut Project and associations with history of cesarean birth or appendectomy.


Cesarean birth history (N = 92)
Appendectomy history (N = 115)
Variable (N; Na)EstimateStd. errorz valueP-valueEstimateStd. errorz valueP-value
Age, mean 46 years (SE 16 years)− 0.040.01− 6.119.7E− 100.050.016.517.5E− 11
Body mass index, mean 24 (SE 5) kg/m20.010.020.230.810.080.024.262.1E− 05
Sex, male (461; 486)0.010.220.050.96− 0.280.20− 1.370.17
Gluten, yes (200; 204)− 0.050.28− 0.190.85− 0.220.27− 0.800.42
Lactose, yes (183; 187)− 0.130.29− 0.430.67− 0.200.28− 0.740.46
Asthma, yes (86; 89)0.070.390.190.850.080.350.220.83



Race/ethnicity
Caucasian, non-Hispanic (964; 995)ReferentReferent
African American (10; 10)− 13.23460.24− 0.030.98− 13.49460.24− 0.030.98
Hispanic (16; 16)− 0.371.04− 0.360.720.130.760.170.87
Asian or Pacific Islander (34; 38)0.580.501.160.24− 1.541.02− 1.510.13
Other (16; 17)− 0.371.04− 0.360.72− 0.701.04− 0.670.50



Geographic region
California (206; 213)ReferentReferent
Other western U.S. (224; 235)0.040.360.100.92− 0.640.30− 2.120.03
Midwestern U.S. (164; 169)− 0.060.40− 0.160.87− 0.600.33− 1.800.07
Northeastern U.S. (196; 200)0.350.351.020.31− 0.360.30− 1.210.23
Southern U.S. (210; 218)0.330.340.960.34− 0.560.30− 1.850.06
Canada (22; 23)0.630.670.930.35− 0.160.65− 0.250.80
Europe (11; 11)− 14.09723.49− 0.020.98− 0.571.07− 0.530.59
Australia (6; 5)− 14.09979.61− 0.010.991.330.931.420.15



Antibiotic use
None in past year (793; 828)ReferentReferent
Yes, 2–6 months ago (112; 114)− 0.250.39− 0.630.530.480.291.670.10
Yes, 7–12 months ago (135; 134)0.080.320.250.800.290.281.030.30



Weight change
Remained stable (877; 908)ReferentReferent
Decreased > 10 lb (104; 107)0.670.401.670.10− 0.430.38− 1.110.27
Increased > 10 lb (53; 54)0.410.500.820.41− 0.190.48− 0.400.69



Diet type
Omnivore (828; 856)ReferentReferent
No red meat (64; 68)0.250.420.610.540.150.390.390.70
Vegan (29; 29)0.190.620.310.760.010.620.010.99
Vegetarian (44; 47)− 0.260.61− 0.430.67− 0.210.53− 0.390.70
Pescetarian (71; 72)0.140.420.330.740.560.341.660.10



Alcohol consumption
Never (221; 226)ReferentReferent
Rarely (few times/month, 255; 265)0.050.320.160.870.220.300.730.46
Occasionally (1–2 times/week, 214; 219)0.200.330.600.55− 0.130.34− 0.400.69
Regularly (3–5 times/week, 205; 213)0.080.340.240.810.550.301.830.07
Daily (142; 149)− 0.330.42− 0.780.430.010.360.030.97



Tobacco smoking
Never (991; 1028)ReferentReferent
Rarely (few times/month, 25; 25)1.010.511.960.05− 0.320.74− 0.430.67
More than rarely (17; 16)0.850.651.320.19− 0.591.04− 0.570.57

Number of participants, cesarean birth analysis; appendectomy analysis.

P-values by Wald test.

In the 1097 fecal specimens, taxa were mapped to 261 bacterial families, 626 genera, and 844 species. Microbiome richness and alpha diversity estimates were not associated with cesarean birth or appendectomy history (Supplemental Table 1). In contrast, composition (beta diversity) of the fecal microbiome differed significantly for participants who reported cesarean birth. Average J–S divergence was strongly associated with cesarean birth at all taxonomic levels, from phylum (permutation P = 0.0076) to species (P = 0.0041, Table 2). In contrast, age was unrelated to average J–S divergence (R = 0.02). As shown in Fig. 1, of four genus-level J–S hierarchical clusters, the prevalence of cesarean birth was 9% in cluster A and 8% in cluster D, whereas cesarean prevalence was high in cluster C (13%) and low in cluster B (0 of 30, P = 0.03). Appendectomy history had no association with beta diversity defined by average J–S divergence (Table 2).
Table 2

K–L distance (beta diversity) analyses of cesarean birth and appendectomy history.

Taxonomic levelTest for clustering by self-reported history
Cesarean birth
Appendectomy
P-valueP-value
Phylum0.00760.79
Class0.0050.69
Order0.0040.66
Family0.0010.29
Genus0.00180.29
Species0.00410.32
Fig. 1

Dendogram of Jensen–Shannon (J–S) divergence and hierarchical clusters of 16S rRNA sequences at the L6 (genus) level for participants in the American Gut project. Each participant's category for age, history of cesarean birth (CSECTION), race/ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), sex, history of appendectomy, and geographic region is shown in colored bars at the bottom. The proportion of participants who reported cesarean birth was high in cluster C (28 of 209, 13%), low in cluster B (0 of 30, 0%), and intermediate in cluster A (10 of 114, 9%) and cluster D (54 of 689, 8%, P = 0.03).

Table 3 presents 14 taxa with increased relative abundance and 3 taxa with decreased relative abundance with Cesarean birth history. Cesarean-delivered adults had nominally reduced abundance of Coprobacillus and Holdemania (phylum Firmicutes) and of Neisseria (Proteobacteria), as well as nominally increased abundance of five genera in the Lachnospiraceae, Peptococcaceae, and Ruminococcaceae families of Clostridia (Firmicutes), Dysgonomonas (Bacteroidetes, Bacteroidales) and Salmonella and Haemophilus (Proteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae). Table 3 also shows the 22 taxa (14 Proteobacteria, 3 Actinobacteria, 3 Bacteroidetes, and 2 Firmicutes), all increased, with appendectomy history. These are nominally significant associations, none of which survived adjustment for multiple comparisons. Mean relative abundances for all 1949 taxa and Wald P-value comparisons are provided in Supplemental Table 2.
Table 3

Individual taxa with nominally significant difference in relative abundance with history of cesarean delivery or appendectomy.

Cesarean-associated bacterial taxaWald P-valueRelative abundance Vaginal_MeanRelative abundance Cesarean_MeanCesarean–vaginal difference
p__Actinobacteria;c__Coriobacteriia;o__Coriobacteriales;f__Coriobacteriaceae;g__Atopobium;s__rimae0.014.22E− 072.17E− 061.75E− 06
p__Bacteroidetes;c__Bacteroidia;o__Bacteroidales;f__Porphyromonadaceae;g__Dysgonomonas;s__0.011.52E− 055.76E− 054.24E− 05
p__Firmicutes0.034.77E− 015.24E− 014.68E− 02
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales0.014.47E− 014.99E− 015.16E− 02
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae0.0021.54E− 011.88E− 013.42E− 02
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__;s__0.0028.42E− 021.07E− 012.26E− 02
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Roseburia0.047.21E− 039.38E− 032.17E− 03
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Peptococcaceae;g__rc4-4;s__0.022.62E− 043.89E− 041.27E− 04
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Ruminococcaceae0.021.94E− 012.17E− 012.30E− 02
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Ruminococcaceae;g__;s__0.021.31E− 011.47E− 011.58E− 02
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Ruminococcaceae;g__Ruminococcus;s__flavefaciens0.037.95E− 041.45E− 036.51E− 04
p__Firmicutes;c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales;f__Erysipelotrichaceae;g__Coprobacillus;s__0.031.88E− 045.33E− 05− 1.35E− 04
p__Firmicutes;c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales;f__Erysipelotrichaceae;g__Holdemania;s__0.053.76E− 042.62E− 04− 1.14E− 04
p__Proteobacteria;c__Betaproteobacteria;o__Burkholderiales;f__Comamonadaceae;g__Methylibium0.051.05E− 065.43E− 064.38E− 06
p__Proteobacteria;c__Betaproteobacteria;o__Neisseriales;f__Neisseriaceae;g__Neisseria;s__subflava0.016.58E− 052.07E− 05− 4.52E− 05
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Enterobacteriales;f__Enterobacteriaceae;g__Salmonella;s__enterica0.014.22E− 073.26E− 062.84E− 06
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Pasteurellales;f__Pasteurellaceae;g__Haemophilus;s__influenzae0.022.11E− 072.17E− 061.96E− 06



Appendectomy-associated bacterial taxaWald P-valueVaginal_MeanCesarean_MeanCesarean–vaginal difference

p__Actinobacteria;c__Actinobacteria;o__Actinomycetales;f__Brevibacteriaceae;g__Brevibacterium;s__aureum0.043.12E− 072.26E− 052.23E− 05
p__Actinobacteria;c__Actinobacteria;o__Actinomycetales;f__Micrococcaceae;g__Rothia;s__dentocariosa0.033.23E− 069.57E− 066.34E− 06
p__Actinobacteria;c__Actinobacteria;o__Actinomycetales;f__Promicromonosporaceae;g__Cellulosimicrobium;s__0.012.10E− 051.40E− 041.19E− 04
p__Bacteroidetes;c__Bacteroidia;o__Bacteroidales;f__;g__;s__0.011.29E− 033.28E− 031.98E− 03
p__Bacteroidetes;c__Bacteroidia;o__Bacteroidales;f__Prevotellaceae;g__Prevotella;s__stercorea0.027.72E− 042.44E− 031.67E− 03
p__Bacteroidetes;c__Flavobacteriia;o__Flavobacteriales;f__Flavobacteriaceae;g__Capnocytophaga;s__ochracea0.042.08E− 078.70E− 076.61E− 07
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Ruminococcaceae;g__Faecalibacterium0.032.75E− 023.20E− 024.57E− 03
p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Ruminococcaceae;g__Faecalibacterium;s__prausnitzii0.032.73E− 023.18E− 024.55E− 03
p__Proteobacteria;c__;o__;f__;g__;s__0.031.87E− 066.96E− 065.08E− 06
p__Proteobacteria;c__Alphaproteobacteria;o__Sphingomonadales0.051.02E− 044.33E− 043.31E− 04
p__Proteobacteria;c__Alphaproteobacteria;o__Sphingomonadales;f__Sphingomonadaceae0.029.25E− 054.25E− 043.33E− 04
p__Proteobacteria;c__Alphaproteobacteria;o__Sphingomonadales;f__Sphingomonadaceae;g__Sphingobium;s__0.024.80E− 052.29E− 041.81E− 04
p__Proteobacteria;c__Betaproteobacteria;o__Burkholderiales;f__Comamonadaceae;g__Acidovorax;s__0.052.19E− 061.13E− 059.12E− 06
p__Proteobacteria;c__Betaproteobacteria;o__Nitrosomonadales;f__Nitrosomonadaceae;g__;s__0.031.46E− 064.35E− 062.89E− 06
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Alteromonadales;f__[Chromatiaceae]0.025.52E− 061.83E− 051.27E− 05
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Alteromonadales;f__[Chromatiaceae];g__;s__0.034.99E− 061.74E− 051.24E− 05
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Alteromonadales;f__OM600.037.18E− 061.65E− 059.34E− 06
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Alteromonadales;f__OM60;g__;s__0.056.87E− 061.57E− 058.78E− 06
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Enterobacteriales;f__Enterobacteriaceae;g__Morganella;s__0.045.31E− 062.35E− 051.82E− 05
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Enterobacteriales;f__Enterobacteriaceae;g__Providencia0.044.25E− 052.90E− 042.47E− 04
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Oceanospirillales;f__Halomonadaceae;g__Candidatus Portiera;s__0.021.25E− 065.22E− 063.97E− 06
p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__PYR10d3;f__;g__;s__0.031.21E− 052.43E− 051.23E− 05

Discussion

This analysis was primarily motivated by the observation that the composition of the microbiome of neonates differed significantly between those born vaginally and those born by cesarean section (Arrieta et al., 2014, Dominguez-Bello et al., 2010). With vaginal delivery, the neonatal microbiome resembled the vaginal microbiome, with high relative abundance of Prevotella and especially Lactobacillus taxa. In contrast, cesarean-delivered neonates had a diverse array of taxa resembling the skin microbial community, including Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Propionibacterineae, Haemophilus, and Acinetobacter (Dominguez-Bello et al., 2010). Cesarean-delivered neonates and infants typically have a paucity of Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides species (Arrieta et al., 2014). In the current analysis, we observed that the fecal microbiome composition differed in adults who reported that they had been delivered by cesarean section. This suggests that a difference by route of delivery may persist into adulthood. Of the taxa noted to be increased in cesarean-delivered neonates and infants (Arrieta et al., 2014, Penders et al., 2006, Dominguez-Bello et al., 2010), only Haemophilus and certain Clostridia genera had elevated abundance in the fecal microbiome of cesarean-delivered adults (Table 3). In the placenta, microbiome composition (beta diversity) was reported to generally resemble the healthy oral microbiome. Placenta microbial composition differed for two types of women — those who reported a first-trimester urinary tract infection, with enrichment of several genera including Streptococcus and Acinetobacter; and those who had a pre-term delivery, with enrichment of Burkholderia and other genera (Aagaard et al., 2014). No overlap was observed between these taxa and the taxa that we found to differ, with nominal statistical significance, in the fecal microbiome of adults who had been born by cesarean section or who reported removal of their appendix (Table 3). The placenta microbiome was not found to differ between cesarean and vaginal birth (Aagaard et al., 2014). Our study had several strengths, including relatively large size; high quality, unbiased profiles of the microbiome; restriction to individual adults; careful exclusion of recent antibiotic use and medical conditions that might have altered the microbiota; state-of-the-art statistical methods; and comparison of two conditions postulated to alter the gut microbiota. Although widely dispersed across the USA, the participants were not representative of the American adult population, being overwhelmingly non-Hispanic Caucasian (93%) and non-smokers (96%). Nonetheless, the prevalence of cesarean birth in our population, which was born on average in 1967, was 8.8%, comparable to the estimated cesarean rates of 5.5% and 10.4% for births throughout the USA in 1970 and 1975, respectively (Anon., 1995). The prevalence of appendectomy in our study, 14%, was similar to the 11%–14% prevalence reported by Dutch and British general population controls (Russel et al., 1997, Gent et al., 1994). Our study also had important limitations, of which our lack of data on clinical indication for cesarean section may be the most important, given the fetal distress and antibiotic exposures associated with emergency cesarean. All of the covariate data (metadata) that we did have were self-reported, including birth and appendectomy history. We lacked data to confirm the Human Microbiome Project's finding that fecal microbial composition differed with self-reported history of having been breastfed (Ding and Schloss, 2014). The validity of some self-reported early life events is modest at best. Among Swedish adults, self-reported birth weight compared to birth records had a Spearman correlation of 0.76, and 53% of the self-reported birth weights were off by 250 g or more (Andersson et al., 2000). Among ethnically diverse, middle aged women in New York, self-report for pre-eclampsia in their mothers had a sensitivity of 36% but a specificity of 97% (Terry et al., 2009). Accuracy of self-report of cesarean birth is unknown. To reduce misclassification in our study, we excluded participants with uncertain history or missing data. We also excluded for self-reported use of an antibiotic within one month of participation. Nonetheless, altered taxonomy of the bacterial communities of both feces and saliva has been seen at 2 months to as long as 4 years after treatment with an antibiotic (Fouhy et al., 2012, Jakobsson et al., 2010, Dethlefsen and Relman, 2011). Despite this, both antibiotic use during infancy and cesarean birth, with or without antibiotic exposure, appear to increase the risk of obesity in childhood (Blustein et al., 2013, Trasande et al., 2013). In our study of adults, antibiotic use more than one month earlier was not associated with cesarean or appendectomy history (Table 1) and thus would not have substantially confounded our findings. Residual antibiotic effects or misclassification of birth history would likely bias toward the null. Finally, although we excluded duplicate participants, data were lacking to assess whether any twin pairs were included. This is an important limitation, because the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota within twin pairs is significantly more alike than expected by chance alone (Turnbaugh et al., 2009, Cozen et al., 2013). In summary, we found a distinct difference in the composition of the fecal microbiota of adult volunteers who were born by cesarean section. History of appendectomy had no such distinction. The cesarean-birth distinction was independent of age and robust across all levels of bacterial taxonomy, but insufficient to define a cesarean-associated microbiome signature. The weaker association with hierarchical clusters (Fig. 1), suggests that many rare taxa contribute to the distinction. The individual taxa that were associated with cesarean birth or appendectomy (Table 3) were not statistically significant when adjusted for multiple comparisons, but they do provide hypotheses that can be examined in future studies. It remains to be seen whether neonatal differences in the gut microbiota directly or indirectly affect the risk of immunologic and metabolic diseases in adult life. The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplemental Table 1

Associations of microbiome richness and alpha diversity with cesarean birth or appendectomy history.

Supplemental Table 2

Associations of mean relative abundances for all 1949 taxa with cesarean birth or appendectomy history.

Conflict of Interest

The authors wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
  31 in total

1.  Appendectomy and the risk of developing ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease: results of a large case-control study. South Limburg Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group.

Authors:  M G Russel; E Dorant; R J Brummer; M A van de Kruijs; J W Muris; J M Bergers; J Goedhard; R W Stockbrügger
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic disorders in childhood.

Authors:  H Renz-Polster; M R David; A S Buist; W M Vollmer; E A O'Connor; E A Frazier; M A Wall
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.018

3.  Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy.

Authors:  John Penders; Carel Thijs; Cornelis Vink; Foekje F Stelma; Bianca Snijders; Ischa Kummeling; Piet A van den Brandt; Ellen E Stobberingh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Rates of cesarean delivery--United States, 1993.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1995-04-21       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns.

Authors:  Maria G Dominguez-Bello; Elizabeth K Costello; Monica Contreras; Magda Magris; Glida Hidalgo; Noah Fierer; Rob Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A meta-analysis of the association between Caesarean section and childhood asthma.

Authors:  S Thavagnanam; J Fleming; A Bromley; M D Shields; C R Cardwell
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.018

7.  The role of birth cohorts in studies of adult health: the New York women's birth cohort.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Julie Flom; Parisa Tehranifar; Ezra Susser
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body.

Authors:  Tao Ding; Patrick D Schloss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Gut microbiomes of Malawian twin pairs discordant for kwashiorkor.

Authors:  Michelle I Smith; Tanya Yatsunenko; Mark J Manary; Indi Trehan; Rajhab Mkakosya; Jiye Cheng; Andrew L Kau; Stephen S Rich; Patrick Concannon; Josyf C Mychaleckyj; Jie Liu; Eric Houpt; Jia V Li; Elaine Holmes; Jeremy Nicholson; Dan Knights; Luke K Ursell; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Cardiovascular disease risk in healthy children and its association with body mass index: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claire Friedemann; Carl Heneghan; Kamal Mahtani; Matthew Thompson; Rafael Perera; Alison M Ward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-09-25
View more
  34 in total

1.  Diabetes: Antibiotics or prodiabetics?

Authors:  Rémy Burcelin; Jacques Amar
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 2.  Antibiotics, gut microbiota, environment in early life and type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Youjia Hu; F Susan Wong; Li Wen
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 7.658

3.  Investigation of the association between the fecal microbiota and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a population-based case-control pilot study.

Authors:  James J Goedert; Gieira Jones; Xing Hua; Xia Xu; Guoqin Yu; Roberto Flores; Roni T Falk; Mitchell H Gail; Jianxin Shi; Jacques Ravel; Heather Spencer Feigelson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Primate microbiomes over time: Longitudinal answers to standing questions in microbiome research.

Authors:  Johannes R Björk; Mauna Dasari; Laura Grieneisen; Elizabeth A Archie
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 5.  Gut instincts: microbiota as a key regulator of brain development, ageing and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The Maternal Infant Microbiome: Considerations for Labor and Birth.

Authors:  Alexis B Dunn; Sheila Jordan; Brenda J Baker; Nicole S Carlson
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.412

Review 7.  Complementary Methodologies To Investigate Human Gut Microbiota in Host Health, Working towards Integrative Systems Biology.

Authors:  Manuel Ferrer; David Rojo; Celia Méndez-García; Coral Barbas
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  The Neonatal Microbiome and Its Partial Role in Mediating the Association between Birth by Cesarean Section and Adverse Pediatric Outcomes.

Authors:  Diana Montoya-Williams; Dominick J Lemas; Lisa Spiryda; Keval Patel; O'neshia Olivia Carney; Josef Neu; Tiffany L Carson
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Birth by cesarean section and schizophrenia: results from the multicenter FACE-SZ data-set.

Authors:  G Fond; E Bulzacka; L Boyer; P M Llorca; O Godin; L Brunel; M G Andrianarisoa; B Aouizerate; F Berna; D Capdevielle; I Chereau; H Denizot; J M Dorey; C Dubertret; J Dubreucq; C Faget; F Gabayet; Y Le Strat; J A Micoulaud-Franchi; D Misdrahi; R Rey; R Richieri; M Roger; C Passerieux; A Schandrin; M Urbach; P Vidalhet; F Schürhoff; M Leboyer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Assessing Early Life Factors for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Lessons From Other Allergic Diseases.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Jensen; Randi J Bertelsen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.