Literature DB >> 29967993

Intraocular pressure increases after complex simulated surgical procedures in residents: an experimental study.

Jesús Vera1,2, Carolina Diaz-Piedra3,4, Raimundo Jiménez1, Jose M Sanchez-Carrion5, Leandro L Di Stasi6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgeons' overload is one of the main causes of medical errors that might compromise patient safety. Due to the drawbacks of current options to monitor surgeons' load, new, sensitive, and objective indices of task (over)load need to be considered and tested. In non-health-care scenarios, intraocular pressure (IOP) has been proved to be an unbiased physiological index, sensitive to task complexity (one of the main variables related to overload), and time on task. In the present study, we assessed the effects of demanding and complex simulated surgical procedures on surgical and medical residents' IOP.
METHODS: Thirty-four surgical and medical residents and healthcare professionals took part in this study (the experimental group, N = 17, and the control group, N = 17, were matched for sex and age). The experimental group performed two simulated bronchoscopy procedures that differ in their levels of complexity. The control group mimicked the same hand-eye movements and posture of the experimental group to help control for the potential effects of time on task and re-measurement on IOP. We measured IOP before and after each procedure, surgical performance during procedures, and perceived task complexity.
RESULTS: IOP increased as consequence of performing the most complex procedure only in the experimental group. Consistently, residents performed worse and reported higher perceived task complexity for the more complex procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show, for the first time, that IOP is sensitive to residents' task load, and it could be used as a new index to easily and rapidly assess task (over)load in healthcare scenarios. An arousal-based explanation is given to describe IOP variations due to task complexity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive load; Mental workload; Neuroergonomics; Ocular biomarkers; Patient safety

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29967993     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6297-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  52 in total

Review 1.  Autonomic nervous system, circadian rhythms, and primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Doina Gherghel; Sarah L Hosking; Selim Orgül
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  What is the relationship between mental workload factors and cognitive load types?

Authors:  Edith Galy; Magali Cariou; Claudine Mélan
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.

Authors:  Leon N Davies; Hannah Bartlett; Edward A H Mallen; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes.

Authors:  Richard A Armstrong
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of the influence of aerobic and resistance exercise of the upper and lower limb on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Florian Rüfer; Johanna Schiller; Alexa Klettner; Ines Lanzl; Johann Roider; Burkhard Weisser
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 6.  Saccadic velocity as an arousal index in naturalistic tasks.

Authors:  Leandro L Di Stasi; Andrés Catena; José J Cañas; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach.

Authors:  E Hoddes; V Zarcone; H Smythe; R Phillips; W C Dement
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation monitoring using an ocular telemetry Sensor: tolerability and functionality in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Stefan De Smedt; André Mermoud; Corinne Schnyder
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Psychomotor testing predicts rate of skill acquisition for proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; James R Korndorffer; F William Black; J Bruce Dunne; Rafael Sierra; Cheri L Touchard; David A Rice; Ronald J Markert; Peter R Kastl; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Impact of extended-duration shifts on medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures.

Authors:  Laura K Barger; Najib T Ayas; Brian E Cade; John W Cronin; Bernard Rosner; Frank E Speizer; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.