Literature DB >> 16904977

Psychomotor testing predicts rate of skill acquisition for proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training.

Dimitrios Stefanidis1, James R Korndorffer, F William Black, J Bruce Dunne, Rafael Sierra, Cheri L Touchard, David A Rice, Ronald J Markert, Peter R Kastl, Daniel J Scott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic simulator training translates into improved operative performance. Proficiency-based curricula maximize efficiency by tailoring training to meet the needs of each individual; however, because rates of skill acquisition vary widely, such curricula may be difficult to implement. We hypothesized that psychomotor testing would predict baseline performance and training duration in a proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator curriculum.
METHODS: Residents (R1, n = 20) were enrolled in an IRB-approved prospective study at the beginning of the academic year. All completed the following: a background information survey, a battery of 12 innate ability measures (5 motor, and 7 visual-spatial), and baseline testing on 3 validated simulators (5 videotrainer [VT] tasks, 12 virtual reality [minimally invasive surgical trainer-virtual reality, MIST-VR] tasks, and 2 laparoscopic camera navigation [LCN] tasks). Participants trained to proficiency, and training duration and number of repetitions were recorded. Baseline test scores were correlated to skill acquisition rate. Cutoff scores for each predictive test were calculated based on a receiver operator curve, and their sensitivity and specificity were determined in identifying slow learners.
RESULTS: Only the Cards Rotation test correlated with baseline simulator ability on VT and LCN. Curriculum implementation required 347 man-hours (6-person team) and 795,000 dollars of capital equipment. With an attendance rate of 75%, 19 of 20 residents (95%) completed the curriculum by the end of the academic year. To complete training, a median of 12 hours (range, 5.5-21), and 325 repetitions (range, 171-782) were required. Simulator score improvement was 50%. Training duration and repetitions correlated with prior video game and billiard exposure, grooved pegboard, finger tap, map planning, Rey Figure Immediate Recall score, and baseline performance on VT and LCN. The map planning cutoff score proved most specific in identifying slow learners.
CONCLUSIONS: Proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training provides improvement in performance and can be effectively implemented as a routine part of resident education, but may require significant resources. Although psychomotor testing may be of limited value in the prediction of baseline laparoscopic performance, its importance may lie in the prediction of the rapidity of skill acquisition. These tests may be useful in optimizing curricular design by allowing the tailoring of training to individual needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16904977     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  34 in total

1.  Assessment of the role of aptitude in the acquisition of advanced laparoscopic surgical skill sets: results from a virtual reality-based laparoscopic colectomy training programme.

Authors:  Emmeline Nugent; Hazem Hseino; Emily Boyle; Brian Mehigan; Kieran Ryan; Oscar Traynor; Paul Neary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.

Authors:  Genevieve Dulan; Robert V Rege; Deborah C Hogg; Kristine M Gilberg-Fisher; Nabeel A Arain; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Vital signs: how early can resident evaluation predict acquisition of competency in surgical pathology?

Authors:  Barbara S Ducatman; H James Williams; Gerald Hobbs; Kymberly A Gyure
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

4.  Inconsistent reporting of minimally invasive surgery errors.

Authors:  A D White; M Skelton; F Mushtaq; T W Pike; M Mon-Williams; J P A Lodge; R M Wilkie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Gynaecological laparoscopy courses in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  H M Elbiss; S George; I Sidky; F M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  The new ACS/APDS Skills Curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room.

Authors:  Daniel J Scott; Gary L Dunnington
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Virtual reality laparoscopy: which potential trainee starts with a higher proficiency level?

Authors:  M Paschold; M Schröder; D W Kauff; T Gorbauch; M Herzer; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Predictive value of background experiences and visual spatial ability testing on laparoscopic baseline performance among residents entering postgraduate surgical training.

Authors:  Marisa Louridas; Lauren E Quinn; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  LLETZ Specimen Fragmentation: Impact on Diagnosis, Outcome, and Implications for Training.

Authors:  Rasiah Bharathan; Balvinder Sagoo; Aravind Subramaniam; Peter Larsen-Disney; Andrew Fish
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-03-26

10.  Visuo-spatial ability in colonoscopy simulator training.

Authors:  Jan-Maarten Luursema; Sonja N Buzink; Willem B Verwey; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.