Literature DB >> 29956436

Investigating polygenic burden in age at disease onset in bipolar disorder: Findings from an international multicentric study.

Janos L Kalman1,2,3, Sergi Papiol1,2,4, Andreas J Forstner5,6,7, Urs Heilbronner1,8, Franziska Degenhardt5, Jana Strohmaier9, Mazda Adli10, Kristina Adorjan1,2, Nirmala Akula11, Martin Alda12, Heike Anderson-Schmidt1,8, Till Fm Andlauer13, Ion-George Anghelescu14, Raffaella Ardau15, Bárbara Arias16, Volker Arolt17, Jean-Michel Aubry18, Lena Backlund19, Kim Bartholdi1, Michael Bauer20, Bernhard T Baune21, Thomas Becker22, Frank Bellivier23, Antonio Benabarre24, Susanne Bengesser25, Abesh Kumar Bhattacharjee26, Joanna M Biernacka27, Armin Birner25, Clara Brichant-Petitjean23, Monika Budde1, Pablo Cervantes28, Caterina Chillotti15, Sven Cichon5,7, Scott R Clark21, Francesc Colom29, Ashley L Comes1,3, Cristiana Cruceanu13,28, Piotr M Czerski30, Udo Dannlowski17, Alexandre Dayer18, Maria Del Zompo31, Jay Raymond DePaulo32, Detlef E Dietrich33, Bruno Étain23, Thomas Ethofer34, Peter Falkai2, Andreas Fallgatter34, Christian Figge35, Laura Flatau1, Here Folkerts36, Louise Frisen19, Mark A Frye27, Janice M Fullerton37,38, Katrin Gade1,8, Sébastien Gard39, Julie S Garnham12, Fernando S Goes32, Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu40, Anna Gryaznova1, Maria Hake1, Joanna Hauser30, Stefan Herms5,7, Per Hoffmann5,7, Liping Hou11, Markus Jäger22, Stephane Jamain41, Esther Jiménez24, Georg Juckel42, Jean-Pierre Kahn43, Layla Kassem44, John Kelsoe26, Sarah Kittel-Schneider45, Sebastian Kliwicki46, Farah Klohn-Sagatholislam1,2, Manfred Koller47, Barbara König48, Carsten Konrad49, Nina Lackner25, Gonzalo Laje11, Mikael Landén50,51, Fabian U Lang22, Catharina Lavebratt39, Marion Leboyer41,52, Susan G Leckband53, Mario Maj54, Mirko Manchia55,56, Lina Martinsson57, Michael J McCarthy26, Susan L McElroy58, Francis J McMahon11, Philip B Mitchell59,60, Marina Mitjans61, Francis M Mondimore32, Palmiero Monteleone54,62, Vanessa Nieratschker34, Caroline M Nievergelt26, Tomas Novák63,64, Urban Ösby65, Andrea Pfennig20, James B Potash66, Daniela Reich-Erkelenz1, Andreas Reif45, Jens Reimer67, Eva Reininghaus25, Markus Reitt8, Stephan Ripke10,68, Guy A Rouleau28, Janusz K Rybakowski46, Martin Schalling19, Harald Scherk69, Max Schmauß70, Peter R Schofield37,38, K Oliver Schubert21, Eva C Schulte1,2, Sybille Schulz67, Fanny Senner1,2, Giovanni Severino31, Tatyana Shekhtman26, Paul D Shilling26, Christian Simhandl71,72, Claire M Slaney12, Carsten Spitzer73, Alessio Squassina31, Thomas Stamm10,74, Sophia Stegmaier34, Sebastian Stierl75, Pavla Stopkova63, Andreas Thiel49, Sarah K Tighe66, Alfonso Tortorella76, Gustavo Turecki77, Eduard Vieta24, Julia Veeh45, Martin von Hagen78, Moritz E Wigand22, Jens Wiltfang8, Stephanie Witt9, Adam Wright59,60, Peter P Zandi32, Jörg Zimmermann67, Markus Nöthen5, Marcella Rietschel9, Thomas G Schulze1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorder (BD) with early disease onset is associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome and constitutes a clinically and biologically homogenous subgroup within the heterogeneous BD spectrum. Previous studies have found an accumulation of early age at onset (AAO) in BD families and have therefore hypothesized that there is a larger genetic contribution to the early-onset cases than to late onset BD. To investigate the genetic background of this subphenotype, we evaluated whether an increased polygenic burden of BD- and schizophrenia (SCZ)-associated risk variants is associated with an earlier AAO in BD patients.
METHODS: A total of 1995 BD type 1 patients from the Consortium of Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen), PsyCourse and Bonn-Mannheim samples were genotyped and their BD and SCZ polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were calculated using the summary statistics of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium as a training data set. AAO was either separated into onset groups of clinical interest (childhood and adolescence [≤18 years] vs adulthood [>18 years]) or considered as a continuous measure. The associations between BD- and SCZ-PRSs and AAO were evaluated with regression models.
RESULTS: BD- and SCZ-PRSs were not significantly associated with age at disease onset. Results remained the same when analyses were stratified by site of recruitment.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study is the largest conducted so far to investigate the association between the cumulative BD and SCZ polygenic risk and AAO in BD patients. The reported negative results suggest that such a polygenic influence, if there is any, is not large, and highlight the importance of conducting further, larger scale studies to obtain more information on the genetic architecture of this clinically relevant phenotype.
© 2018 The Authors. Bipolar Disorders Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age at onset; bipolar disorder; early onset; polygenic risk score; schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29956436      PMCID: PMC6585855          DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bipolar Disord        ISSN: 1398-5647            Impact factor:   6.744


INTRODUCTION

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a multifactorial disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of elevated and depressed mood. According to heritability estimates, genetic factors explain 60%‐80% of the variance in this disorder and recent association studies have shown that a significant proportion of its genetic liability can be attributed to common variation.1, 2, 3, 4 Despite this relatively robust genetic component, the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity of this mental disorder has hampered our understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms.4 Studies on breast cancer, colon cancer, and Alzheimer's disease have provided evidence that identifying subphenotypes underlying the clinical diagnosis can assist with patient stratification. This approach, of narrowing down the molecular heterogeneity of these complex and polygenic disorders, holds promise for the identification of the genetic factors involved.5, 6 In BD, the presence and severity of psychotic symptoms, first episode polarity, response to lithium, functional impairments, and age at onset (AAO) are considered as promising phenotypes for the identification of putatively biologically homogenous disease‐subgroups.7, 8 The recent identification of novel lithium response‐associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by the Consortium of Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) and Song et al. underline the potential of this approach in BD and call for further analyses on similar well‐defined subphenotypes.9, 10 Clinical studies have shown that early‐onset BD (onset prior to 18 years of age) is more severe and homogeneous than other forms of BD, and thus it is one of the most frequently examined subphenotype candidates. This subgroup is associated with a higher recurrence rate of mood episodes, higher rates of psychotic symptoms and of comorbid conditions and more frequent suicide attempts and neurocognitive impairments.8, 11 Moreover, it has also been hypothesized, mostly based on the observations of family and heritability studies, that early‐onset BD is genetically different from the late‐onset subgroup.12, 13 However, candidate gene studies and genome‐wide association studies (GWASs) have failed to unambiguously identify genetic markers specifically associated with early‐onset forms of BD. This may be in part due to limited statistical power.14, 15 Current evidence derived from GWASs, in a wide range of psychiatric (and non‐psychiatric) complex phenotypes, indicates that the genetic architecture of psychiatric disorders is characterized by a marked polygenicity.16, 17, 18 Therefore, estimating the genetic risk burden by employing polygenic risk scores (PRSs) holds promise for a better understanding of the genetic basis of the phenotype and its genetic overlap with other phenotypes/disorders.18, 19 For instance, genome‐wide complex trait analysis has shown that 79% of common variants are shared between BD and schizophrenia (SCZ) and that SCZ‐PRSs are good predictors of BD case‐control status.2, 18 However, a single study thus far has investigated the association between the cumulative genomic risk for BD (BD‐PRS) and disease onset and found no significant results.20 The association with SCZ‐PRS has not been tested yet. Given the limited knowledge of the genetic structure of AAO in BD, the aim of the current study was to use PRSs to investigate whether earlier disease onset is associated with a higher genetic liability to BD and/or SCZ in 1995 BD type 1 patients.

METHODS

Subjects

The phenotypic and genetic data of patients with a lifetime diagnosis of DSM‐III or DSM‐IV BD type 1 were assembled from the ConLiGen, Bonn‐Mannheim (BoMa) and PsyCourse samples. Patients included in this analysis were recruited at 21 sites in 12 countries across North America (Canada and the USA), Europe (Austria, Czech Republic, Italy, France, Germany, Poland, Romania, Spain and Sweden) and Australia. Their AAO was defined as the age at the first DSM‐III or DSM‐IV mood episode (depressive, manic or hypomanic) based on the information obtained at the diagnostic interview and from medical records. Ascertainment and diagnostic assessment for the ConLiGen study have been described previously.7, 9 Patients in the BoMa sample were recruited from consecutive hospital admissions at the Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.21 Only patients not part of the PGC‐BD1 analyses were included in the current study.22 PsyCourse is an ongoing, multicenter study conducted at a network of clinical sites across Germany and Austria (http://psycourse.de).23 The phenotypic characteristics of the patients recruited at the individual sites and the respective sample sizes are presented in Supporting Information Table S1. The reported sample sizes represent those available after quality control (exclusion of patients with no information on age [N = 59], gender [N = 2], or AAO, or having improbable AAO data [N = 162]). This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants aged ≥ 18 years, and written assent and parental permission were obtained from children aged < 18 years and their parent/legal guardian before participation in the study. Approval from each institution's ethics committees was obtained.

Genotyping and imputation

DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and samples were genotyped at the National Institute of Mental Health (Bethesda, MD, USA) or Broad Institute (ConLiGen) and Life & Brain Center at the University of Bonn (ConLiGen, PsyCourse and BoMa). The genotyping, quality control and imputation pipelines used for the samples are described in Hou et al., Andlauer et al. and Mühlheisen et al. in more detail.9, 21, 24 Briefly, the subsamples were genotyped on Affymetrix (Affymetrix 6.0, Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) or Illumina (Human610/660W, HumanOmniExpress, HumanOmni1‐Quad or HumanOmni2.5, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) SNP arrays. Participants from the PsyCourse and BoMa cohorts were genotyped on Illumina (Human610/660W or Infinium PsychArray) SNP arrays. Quality control and imputation were carried out separately for the distinct SNP arrays. Genotype imputation was performed using the 1000 Genomes reference panel using either SHAPEIT2 and IMPUTE2 (BoMa and PsyCourse) or SHAPEIT2 and minimac (ConLiGen).25, 26 The Caucasian‐European origin of the samples was confirmed by principal component analysis of the genetic relationship matrix.

Polygenic scoring

Polygenic scores were generated using PLINK v.1.9, by applying the method used by the International Schizophrenia Consortium, as described in Purcell et al.18, 27 First, the SNPs shared between either the Psychiatric Genomics Consortiums SCZ or BD GWAS summary statistics data sets (PGC SCZ2 and PGC BD) and a merged data set of the samples included in this study were identified, resulting in N = 92 703 (SCZ) and N = 101 007 (BD) autosomal SNPs pruned for minimalizing pair‐wise linkage disequilibrium.17, 22 This harmonized set of PGC SCZ2 and PGC BD summary data was then used as the source of information on the allelic risk variants and their associated odds ratios (ORs). PRSs were calculated by multiplying the imputation probability for each risk allele by the log(OR) for each genetic variant in PGC SCZ2 and PGC BD. The resulting values were summed using all SNPs (P‐value threshold, P T = 1), leading to an estimate of the SCZ or BD polygenic risk burden of each individual.

Statistical analysis

AAO was analyzed both as a continuous and as a categorical measure; the association between AAO and either BD‐ or SCZ‐PRS was evaluated using linear and logistic regression models, respectively. The AAO subgroups were initially identified to represent the developmental stages, namely childhood (≤12 years), adolescence (13‐18 years), or adulthood (>18 years).28 However, because of highly unbalanced sample sizes (N = 93, 555 and 1347, respectively), the childhood and adolescence groups were collapsed into a single early‐onset group (≤18 years) and compared to the late‐onset cases (>18 years) in the categorical analysis. Sex, age at interview, recruitment site, genotyping chip, 10 ancestry principal components and the applied imputation strategy were taken into consideration as covariates. Backward stepwise regression model selection indicated that the 1st, 4th, 6th and 8th ancestry principal components, site, genotyping chip, age at interview and imputation strategy were significantly associated with the continuous AAO. The 4th, 6th, 7th and 10th ancestry principal components, gender, site, genotyping chip, age at interview and imputation strategy were associated with the categorical AAO measure. Therefore, these variables were controlled for in the respective analyses. The proportion of variance explained (R 2) was calculated by subtracting the effects of the covariates from the full model including PRS. The residuals of the linear regression models were normally distributed. The significance threshold was corrected for testing two PRSs to α = 0.025. All analyses were performed in the statistical computing environment R 3.4.2 with the packages car 2.1‐5, fmsb 0.6.1 and nnet 7.3‐12.29

RESULTS

We analyzed a sample of 1995 BD type 1 patients (55.1% female). The mean (± SD) AAO across all centers was 24.83 (±10.59) years and the AAO ranged between 6 and 67 years. The AAO was not different between the sexes (mean ± SD: male patients, 24.96 ± 10.720 years; female patients, 24.73 ± 10.32 years; P = .623). No significant association was observed between continuous AAO and BD‐PRS (P = .376, t = −0.886, standardized β = −0.000065, R 2 change = −.01%) or SCZ‐PRS (P = .99, t = −0.01, standardized β = −1.322 × 10−6, R 2 change = −.04%). Full results, including P‐values, t values and R 2 change are summarized in Supporting Information Tables S2‐S3. Furthermore, no significant group difference was observed when AAO was considered as a dichotomous variable and BD‐ and SCZ‐PRSs of the early‐onset (≤18 years) and late‐onset (>18 years) AAO groups were compared using binary logistic regression (P = .16, Nagelkerke's R 2 change = .105%, OR = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99‐1.03, and P = .88, Nagelkerke's R 2 change = .002%, OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.96‐1.03, respectively). Full results, including correlation coefficients, ORs, 95% CIs and P‐values, are summarized in Supporting Information Tables S4‐S5. Patients recruited in the USA had a significantly lower AAO compared to those from the European, Australian and Canadian sites (mean ± SD: 19.25 ± 9.55 and 25.92 ± 10.33 years, respectively, P < 2.25 × 10−26). To ensure that the association between AAO and BD‐ and SCZ‐PRSs was not masked by these geographic differences in AAO distribution, which are well known in the literature, the same linear regressions with initial backward feature selection steps were repeated using only the USA site or the other sites. These additional analyses, similarly to the results for the full data set, found no association with the phenotype of interest. Full results, including P‐values, t values and R 2 change, are summarized in Supporting Information Tables S6‐S9.

DISCUSSION

Although early onset of BD has long been hypothesized to constitute a genetically more homogenous subcategory within the rather heterogenous BD spectrum, the search for phenotype‐specific genetic variants has not yet been successful.12 Being a highly heritable disorder with 43.2% of its genetic liability being explained by common variants of small effect, the development of BD, similarly to that of other complex polygenic conditions, can be modeled within the framework of a liability‐threshold model.2 Individuals with more BD‐ or SCZ‐associated risk alleles can be expected to cross the liability threshold earlier and thus have an earlier disease onset.30 Previous family studies support this hypothesis, as affected siblings of patients with early AAO were reported to be four times more likely to also have an early AAO, and children of couples with a positive history of affective disorders had a higher risk for an earlier AAO.31, 32 However, a study conducted on 255 patients found no difference between the BD‐PRSs of the different AAO groups.20 Evidence shows that the power to detect the genetic underpinnings of complex phenotypes increases with increasing sample sizes. Therefore, we assumed that, using an order of magnitude larger sample than in Aminoff et al., we might find an association between AAO and BD and SCZ.20 Based on the negative findings of our study, one can hypothesize that instead of being largely influenced by SNPs identified in GWASs of BD and SCZ, age at disease onset is rather influenced by other genetic, environmental or epigenetic risk factors. A further possibility is that BD‐ and SCZ‐PRSs explain only a small proportion of the AAO variance and/or the genetics of AAO in BD is more heterogenous than previously assumed and therefore the current study lacked the statistical power to detect an underlying association.

SUMMARY

To our knowledge, this is the largest study thus far to investigate the association between AAO in BD and BD‐ and SCZ‐PRS. The results show, in our sample of 1995 BD patients, that the polygenic burden associated with BD or SCZ risk does not influence the age at illness onset in BD. These negative results highlight the need to conduct further larger scale studies, also including environmental information, to disentangle the genetic architecture of early‐onset BD.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding agencies had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data. Neither were they involved in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. Click here for additional data file.
  31 in total

1.  The International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen): an initiative by the NIMH and IGSLI to study the genetic basis of response to lithium treatment.

Authors:  Thomas G Schulze; Martin Alda; Mazda Adli; Nirmala Akula; Raffaella Ardau; Elise T Bui; Caterina Chillotti; Sven Cichon; Piotr Czerski; Maria Del Zompo; Sevilla D Detera-Wadleigh; Paul Grof; Oliver Gruber; Ryota Hashimoto; Joanna Hauser; Rebecca Hoban; Nakao Iwata; Layla Kassem; Tadafumi Kato; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Sebastian Kliwicki; John R Kelsoe; Ichiro Kusumi; Gonzalo Laje; Susan G Leckband; Mirko Manchia; Glenda Macqueen; Takuya Masui; Norio Ozaki; Roy H Perlis; Andrea Pfennig; Paola Piccardi; Sara Richardson; Guy Rouleau; Andreas Reif; Janusz K Rybakowski; Johanna Sasse; Johannes Schumacher; Giovanni Severino; Jordan W Smoller; Alessio Squassina; Gustavo Turecki; L Trevor Young; Takeo Yoshikawa; Michael Bauer; Francis J McMahon
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.328

2.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Improved whole-chromosome phasing for disease and population genetic studies.

Authors:  Olivier Delaneau; Jean-Francois Zagury; Jonathan Marchini
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  Genetics of bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Nick Craddock; Pamela Sklar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Commingling analysis of age-of-onset in bipolar I disorder and the morbid risk for major psychoses in first degree relatives of bipolar I probands.

Authors:  Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu; Marcella Rietschel; Joanna Hauser; Piotr M Czerski; Stefan Herms; Xianqing Sun; Priya Wickramaratne; Robert C Elston
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Genome-wide association study of 40,000 individuals identifies two novel loci associated with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Liping Hou; Sarah E Bergen; Nirmala Akula; Jie Song; Christina M Hultman; Mikael Landén; Mazda Adli; Martin Alda; Raffaella Ardau; Bárbara Arias; Jean-Michel Aubry; Lena Backlund; Judith A Badner; Thomas B Barrett; Michael Bauer; Bernhard T Baune; Frank Bellivier; Antonio Benabarre; Susanne Bengesser; Wade H Berrettini; Abesh Kumar Bhattacharjee; Joanna M Biernacka; Armin Birner; Cinnamon S Bloss; Clara Brichant-Petitjean; Elise T Bui; William Byerley; Pablo Cervantes; Caterina Chillotti; Sven Cichon; Francesc Colom; William Coryell; David W Craig; Cristiana Cruceanu; Piotr M Czerski; Tony Davis; Alexandre Dayer; Franziska Degenhardt; Maria Del Zompo; J Raymond DePaulo; Howard J Edenberg; Bruno Étain; Peter Falkai; Tatiana Foroud; Andreas J Forstner; Louise Frisén; Mark A Frye; Janice M Fullerton; Sébastien Gard; Julie S Garnham; Elliot S Gershon; Fernando S Goes; Tiffany A Greenwood; Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu; Joanna Hauser; Urs Heilbronner; Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach; Stefan Herms; Maria Hipolito; Shashi Hitturlingappa; Per Hoffmann; Andrea Hofmann; Stephane Jamain; Esther Jiménez; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Layla Kassem; John R Kelsoe; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Sebastian Kliwicki; Daniel L Koller; Barbara König; Nina Lackner; Gonzalo Laje; Maren Lang; Catharina Lavebratt; William B Lawson; Marion Leboyer; Susan G Leckband; Chunyu Liu; Anna Maaser; Pamela B Mahon; Wolfgang Maier; Mario Maj; Mirko Manchia; Lina Martinsson; Michael J McCarthy; Susan L McElroy; Melvin G McInnis; Rebecca McKinney; Philip B Mitchell; Marina Mitjans; Francis M Mondimore; Palmiero Monteleone; Thomas W Mühleisen; Caroline M Nievergelt; Markus M Nöthen; Tomas Novák; John I Nurnberger; Evaristus A Nwulia; Urban Ösby; Andrea Pfennig; James B Potash; Peter Propping; Andreas Reif; Eva Reininghaus; John Rice; Marcella Rietschel; Guy A Rouleau; Janusz K Rybakowski; Martin Schalling; William A Scheftner; Peter R Schofield; Nicholas J Schork; Thomas G Schulze; Johannes Schumacher; Barbara W Schweizer; Giovanni Severino; Tatyana Shekhtman; Paul D Shilling; Christian Simhandl; Claire M Slaney; Erin N Smith; Alessio Squassina; Thomas Stamm; Pavla Stopkova; Fabian Streit; Jana Strohmaier; Szabolcs Szelinger; Sarah K Tighe; Alfonso Tortorella; Gustavo Turecki; Eduard Vieta; Julia Volkert; Stephanie H Witt; Adam Wright; Peter P Zandi; Peng Zhang; Sebastian Zollner; Francis J McMahon
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Common genetic determinants of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Swedish families: a population-based study.

Authors:  Paul Lichtenstein; Benjamin H Yip; Camilla Björk; Yudi Pawitan; Tyrone D Cannon; Patrick F Sullivan; Christina M Hultman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Shaun M Purcell; Naomi R Wray; Jennifer L Stone; Peter M Visscher; Michael C O'Donovan; Patrick F Sullivan; Pamela Sklar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genome-wide association study identifies SESTD1 as a novel risk gene for lithium-responsive bipolar disorder.

Authors:  J Song; S E Bergen; A Di Florio; R Karlsson; A Charney; D M Ruderfer; E A Stahl; K D Chambert; J L Moran; K Gordon-Smith; L Forty; E K Green; I Jones; L Jones; E M Scolnick; P Sklar; J W Smoller; P Lichtenstein; C Hultman; N Craddock; M Landén; Jordan W Smoller; Roy H Perlis; Phil Hyoun Lee; Victor M Castro; Alison G Hoffnagle; Pamela Sklar; Eli A Stahl; Shaun M Purcell; Douglas M Ruderfer; Alexander W Charney; Panos Roussos; Carlos Pato Michele Pato; Helen Medeiros; Janet Sobel; Nick Craddock; Ian Jones; Liz Forty; Arianna Di Florio; Elaine Green; Lisa Jones; Katherine Gordon-Smith; Mikael Landen; Christina Hultman; Anders Jureus; Sarah Bergen; Steven McCarroll; Jennifer Moran; Jordan W Smoller; Kimberly Chambert; Richard A Belliveau
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Insulin resistance takes center stage: a new paradigm in the progression of bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Cynthia V Calkin
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Family Genetic Risk Scores and the Genetic Architecture of Major Affective and Psychotic Disorders in a Swedish National Sample.

Authors:  Kenneth S Kendler; Henrik Ohlsson; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 3.  Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Insights From Genetic Studies and Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Claudia Pisanu; Alessio Squassina
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  The genetic relationship between educational attainment and cognitive performance in major psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Ashley L Comes; Fanny Senner; Monika Budde; Kristina Adorjan; Heike Anderson-Schmidt; Till F M Andlauer; Katrin Gade; Maria Hake; Urs Heilbronner; Janos L Kalman; Daniela Reich-Erkelenz; Farah Klöhn-Saghatolislam; Sabrina K Schaupp; Eva C Schulte; Georg Juckel; Udo Dannlowski; Max Schmauß; Jörg Zimmermann; Jens Reimer; Eva Reininghaus; Ion-George Anghelescu; Volker Arolt; Bernhard T Baune; Carsten Konrad; Andreas Thiel; Andreas J Fallgatter; Vanessa Nieratschker; Christian Figge; Martin von Hagen; Manfred Koller; Thomas Becker; Moritz E Wigand; Markus Jäger; Detlef E Dietrich; Sebastian Stierl; Harald Scherk; Carsten Spitzer; Here Folkerts; Stephanie H Witt; Franziska Degenhardt; Andreas J Forstner; Marcella Rietschel; Markus M Nöthen; Jens Wiltfang; Peter Falkai; Thomas G Schulze; Sergi Papiol
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Investigating polygenic burden in age at disease onset in bipolar disorder: Findings from an international multicentric study.

Authors:  Janos L Kalman; Sergi Papiol; Andreas J Forstner; Urs Heilbronner; Franziska Degenhardt; Jana Strohmaier; Mazda Adli; Kristina Adorjan; Nirmala Akula; Martin Alda; Heike Anderson-Schmidt; Till Fm Andlauer; Ion-George Anghelescu; Raffaella Ardau; Bárbara Arias; Volker Arolt; Jean-Michel Aubry; Lena Backlund; Kim Bartholdi; Michael Bauer; Bernhard T Baune; Thomas Becker; Frank Bellivier; Antonio Benabarre; Susanne Bengesser; Abesh Kumar Bhattacharjee; Joanna M Biernacka; Armin Birner; Clara Brichant-Petitjean; Monika Budde; Pablo Cervantes; Caterina Chillotti; Sven Cichon; Scott R Clark; Francesc Colom; Ashley L Comes; Cristiana Cruceanu; Piotr M Czerski; Udo Dannlowski; Alexandre Dayer; Maria Del Zompo; Jay Raymond DePaulo; Detlef E Dietrich; Bruno Étain; Thomas Ethofer; Peter Falkai; Andreas Fallgatter; Christian Figge; Laura Flatau; Here Folkerts; Louise Frisen; Mark A Frye; Janice M Fullerton; Katrin Gade; Sébastien Gard; Julie S Garnham; Fernando S Goes; Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu; Anna Gryaznova; Maria Hake; Joanna Hauser; Stefan Herms; Per Hoffmann; Liping Hou; Markus Jäger; Stephane Jamain; Esther Jiménez; Georg Juckel; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Layla Kassem; John Kelsoe; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Sebastian Kliwicki; Farah Klohn-Sagatholislam; Manfred Koller; Barbara König; Carsten Konrad; Nina Lackner; Gonzalo Laje; Mikael Landén; Fabian U Lang; Catharina Lavebratt; Marion Leboyer; Susan G Leckband; Mario Maj; Mirko Manchia; Lina Martinsson; Michael J McCarthy; Susan L McElroy; Francis J McMahon; Philip B Mitchell; Marina Mitjans; Francis M Mondimore; Palmiero Monteleone; Vanessa Nieratschker; Caroline M Nievergelt; Tomas Novák; Urban Ösby; Andrea Pfennig; James B Potash; Daniela Reich-Erkelenz; Andreas Reif; Jens Reimer; Eva Reininghaus; Markus Reitt; Stephan Ripke; Guy A Rouleau; Janusz K Rybakowski; Martin Schalling; Harald Scherk; Max Schmauß; Peter R Schofield; K Oliver Schubert; Eva C Schulte; Sybille Schulz; Fanny Senner; Giovanni Severino; Tatyana Shekhtman; Paul D Shilling; Christian Simhandl; Claire M Slaney; Carsten Spitzer; Alessio Squassina; Thomas Stamm; Sophia Stegmaier; Sebastian Stierl; Pavla Stopkova; Andreas Thiel; Sarah K Tighe; Alfonso Tortorella; Gustavo Turecki; Eduard Vieta; Julia Veeh; Martin von Hagen; Moritz E Wigand; Jens Wiltfang; Stephanie Witt; Adam Wright; Peter P Zandi; Jörg Zimmermann; Markus Nöthen; Marcella Rietschel; Thomas G Schulze
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 6.744

6.  Has Bipolar Disorder become a predominantly female gender related condition? Analysis of recently published large sample studies.

Authors:  Bernardo Dell'Osso; Rita Cafaro; Terence A Ketter
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  Dissecting clinical heterogeneity of bipolar disorder using multiple polygenic risk scores.

Authors:  Brandon J Coombes; Matej Markota; J John Mann; Colin Colby; Eli Stahl; Ardesheer Talati; Jyotishman Pathak; Myrna M Weissman; Susan L McElroy; Mark A Frye; Joanna M Biernacka
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  CNVs and Chromosomal Aneuploidy in Patients With Early-Onset Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: Genotype-Phenotype Associations.

Authors:  Hojka Gregoric Kumperscak; Danijela Krgovic; Maja Drobnic Radobuljac; Nina Senica; Andreja Zagorac; Nadja Kokalj Vokac
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Interaction between adverse childhood experiences and polygenic risk in patients with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Young-Min Park; Tatyana Shekhtman; John R Kelsoe
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Characterisation of age and polarity at onset in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Janos L Kalman; Loes M Olde Loohuis; Annabel Vreeker; Andrew McQuillin; Eli A Stahl; Douglas Ruderfer; Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu; Georgia Panagiotaropoulou; Stephan Ripke; Tim B Bigdeli; Frederike Stein; Tina Meller; Susanne Meinert; Helena Pelin; Fabian Streit; Sergi Papiol; Mark J Adams; Rolf Adolfsson; Kristina Adorjan; Ingrid Agartz; Sofie R Aminoff; Heike Anderson-Schmidt; Ole A Andreassen; Raffaella Ardau; Jean-Michel Aubry; Ceylan Balaban; Nicholas Bass; Bernhard T Baune; Frank Bellivier; Antoni Benabarre; Susanne Bengesser; Wade H Berrettini; Marco P Boks; Evelyn J Bromet; Katharina Brosch; Monika Budde; William Byerley; Pablo Cervantes; Catina Chillotti; Sven Cichon; Scott R Clark; Ashley L Comes; Aiden Corvin; William Coryell; Nick Craddock; David W Craig; Paul E Croarkin; Cristiana Cruceanu; Piotr M Czerski; Nina Dalkner; Udo Dannlowski; Franziska Degenhardt; Maria Del Zompo; J Raymond DePaulo; Srdjan Djurovic; Howard J Edenberg; Mariam Al Eissa; Torbjørn Elvsåshagen; Bruno Etain; Ayman H Fanous; Frederike Fellendorf; Alessia Fiorentino; Andreas J Forstner; Mark A Frye; Janice M Fullerton; Katrin Gade; Julie Garnham; Elliot Gershon; Michael Gill; Fernando S Goes; Katherine Gordon-Smith; Paul Grof; Jose Guzman-Parra; Tim Hahn; Roland Hasler; Maria Heilbronner; Urs Heilbronner; Stephane Jamain; Esther Jimenez; Ian Jones; Lisa Jones; Lina Jonsson; Rene S Kahn; John R Kelsoe; James L Kennedy; Tilo Kircher; George Kirov; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Farah Klöhn-Saghatolislam; James A Knowles; Thorsten M Kranz; Trine Vik Lagerberg; Mikael Landen; William B Lawson; Marion Leboyer; Qingqin S Li; Mario Maj; Dolores Malaspina; Mirko Manchia; Fermin Mayoral; Susan L McElroy; Melvin G McInnis; Andrew M McIntosh; Helena Medeiros; Ingrid Melle; Vihra Milanova; Philip B Mitchell; Palmiero Monteleone; Alessio Maria Monteleone; Markus M Nöthen; Tomas Novak; John I Nurnberger; Niamh O'Brien; Kevin S O'Connell; Claire O'Donovan; Michael C O'Donovan; Nils Opel; Abigail Ortiz; Michael J Owen; Erik Pålsson; Carlos Pato; Michele T Pato; Joanna Pawlak; Julia-Katharina Pfarr; Claudia Pisanu; James B Potash; Mark H Rapaport; Daniela Reich-Erkelenz; Andreas Reif; Eva Reininghaus; Jonathan Repple; Hélène Richard-Lepouriel; Marcella Rietschel; Kai Ringwald; Gloria Roberts; Guy Rouleau; Sabrina Schaupp; William A Scheftner; Simon Schmitt; Peter R Schofield; K Oliver Schubert; Eva C Schulte; Barbara Schweizer; Fanny Senner; Giovanni Severino; Sally Sharp; Claire Slaney; Olav B Smeland; Janet L Sobell; Alessio Squassina; Pavla Stopkova; John Strauss; Alfonso Tortorella; Gustavo Turecki; Joanna Twarowska-Hauser; Marin Veldic; Eduard Vieta; John B Vincent; Wei Xu; Clement C Zai; Peter P Zandi; Arianna Di Florio; Jordan W Smoller; Joanna M Biernacka; Francis J McMahon; Martin Alda; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Peter Falkai; Nelson B Freimer; Till F M Andlauer; Thomas G Schulze; Roel A Ophoff
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 10.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.