Mhairi K Doris1,2, Yuka Otaki2, Sandeep K Krishnan2, Jacek Kwiecinski1,2, Mathieu Rubeaux2, Adam Alessio3, Tinsu Pan4, Sebastien Cadet2, Damini Dey2, Marc R Dweck1, David E Newby1, Daniel S Berman2, Piotr J Slomka5,6. 1. BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Clinical Research Imaging Centre, Edinburgh Heart Centre, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4SB, UK. 2. Department of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. piotr.slomka@cshs.org. 6. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Program, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Ste A047N, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. piotr.slomka@cshs.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary PET shows promise in the detection of high-risk atherosclerosis, but there remains a need to optimize imaging and reconstruction techniques. We investigated the impact of reconstruction parameters and cardiac motion-correction in 18F Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF) PET. METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent 18F-NaF PET within 22 days of an acute coronary syndrome. Optimal reconstruction parameters were determined in a subgroup of six patients. Motion-correction was performed on ECG-gated data of all patients with optimal reconstruction. Tracer uptake was quantified in culprit and reference lesions by computing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diastolic, summed, and motion-corrected images. RESULTS: Reconstruction using 24 subsets, 4 iterations, point-spread-function modelling, time of flight, and 5-mm post-filtering provided the highest median SNR (31.5) compared to 4 iterations 0-mm (22.5), 8 iterations 0-mm (21.1), and 8 iterations 5-mm (25.6; all P < .05). Motion-correction improved SNR of culprit lesions (n = 33) (24.5[19.9-31.5]) compared to diastolic (15.7[12.4-18.1]; P < .001) and summed data (22.1[18.9-29.2]; P < .001). Motion-correction increased the SNR difference between culprit and reference lesions (10.9[6.3-12.6]) compared to diastolic (6.2[3.6-10.3]; P = .001) and summed data (7.1 [4.8-11.6]; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of iterations and extent of post-filtering has marked effects on coronary 18F-NaF PET quantification. Cardiac motion-correction improves discrimination between culprit and reference lesions.
BACKGROUND: Coronary PET shows promise in the detection of high-risk atherosclerosis, but there remains a need to optimize imaging and reconstruction techniques. We investigated the impact of reconstruction parameters and cardiac motion-correction in 18F Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF) PET. METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent 18F-NaF PET within 22 days of an acute coronary syndrome. Optimal reconstruction parameters were determined in a subgroup of six patients. Motion-correction was performed on ECG-gated data of all patients with optimal reconstruction. Tracer uptake was quantified in culprit and reference lesions by computing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diastolic, summed, and motion-corrected images. RESULTS: Reconstruction using 24 subsets, 4 iterations, point-spread-function modelling, time of flight, and 5-mm post-filtering provided the highest median SNR (31.5) compared to 4 iterations 0-mm (22.5), 8 iterations 0-mm (21.1), and 8 iterations 5-mm (25.6; all P < .05). Motion-correction improved SNR of culprit lesions (n = 33) (24.5[19.9-31.5]) compared to diastolic (15.7[12.4-18.1]; P < .001) and summed data (22.1[18.9-29.2]; P < .001). Motion-correction increased the SNR difference between culprit and reference lesions (10.9[6.3-12.6]) compared to diastolic (6.2[3.6-10.3]; P = .001) and summed data (7.1 [4.8-11.6]; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of iterations and extent of post-filtering has marked effects on coronary 18F-NaF PET quantification. Cardiac motion-correction improves discrimination between culprit and reference lesions.
Authors: Ahmed Tawakol; Raymond Q Migrino; Gregory G Bashian; Shahinaz Bedri; David Vermylen; Ricardo C Cury; Denise Yates; Glenn M LaMuraglia; Karen Furie; Stuart Houser; Henry Gewirtz; James E Muller; Thomas J Brady; Alan J Fischman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-10-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: James H F Rudd; Kelly S Myers; Sameer Bansilal; Josef Machac; Ash Rafique; Michael Farkouh; Valentin Fuster; Zahi A Fayad Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-08-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: James H F Rudd; Kelly S Myers; Sameer Bansilal; Josef Machac; Cathy Anne Pinto; Christopher Tong; Ash Rafique; Richard Hargeaves; Michael Farkouh; Valentin Fuster; Zahi A Fayad Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Mathieu Rubeaux; Nikhil V Joshi; Marc R Dweck; Alison Fletcher; Manish Motwani; Louise E Thomson; Guido Germano; Damini Dey; Debiao Li; Daniel S Berman; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jacek Kwiecinski; Damini Dey; Sebastien Cadet; Sang-Eun Lee; Yuka Otaki; Phi T Huynh; Mhairi K Doris; Evann Eisenberg; Mijin Yun; Maurits A Jansen; Michelle C Williams; Balaji K Tamarappoo; John D Friedman; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-02-13
Authors: Jacek Kwiecinski; Damini Dey; Sebastien Cadet; Sang-Eun Lee; Balaji Tamarappoo; Yuka Otaki; Phi T Huynh; John D Friedman; Mark R Dweck; David E Newby; Mijin Yun; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jacek Kwiecinski; Philip D Adamson; Martin L Lassen; Mhairi K Doris; Alastair J Moss; Sebastian Cadet; Maurits A Jansen; Damini Dey; Sang-Eun Lee; Mijin Yun; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Daniele Massera; Mhairi K Doris; Sebastien Cadet; Jacek Kwiecinski; Tania A Pawade; Frederique E C M Peeters; Damini Dey; David E Newby; Marc R Dweck; Piotr J Slomka Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Martin Lyngby Lassen; Jacek Kwiecinski; Damini Dey; Sebastien Cadet; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Philip D Adamson; Alastair J Moss; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jacek Kwiecinski; Sebastien Cadet; Marwa Daghem; Martin L Lassen; Damini Dey; Marc R Dweck; Daniel S Berman; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Evangelos Tzolos; Jacek Kwiecinski; Martin Lyngby Lassen; Sebastien Cadet; Philip D Adamson; Alastair J Moss; Nikhil Joshi; Michelle C Williams; Edwin J R van Beek; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 5.952