Literature DB >> 29133478

Clinical Relevance of 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron-Emission Tomography in Noninvasive Identification of High-Risk Plaque in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Joo Myung Lee1, Ji-In Bang1, Bon-Kwon Koo2, Doyeon Hwang1, Jonghanne Park1, Jinlong Zhang1, Tong Yaliang1, Minseok Suh1, Jin Chul Paeng2, Yasutsugu Shiono1, Takashi Kubo1, Takashi Akasaka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) positron-emission tomography has been introduced as a potential noninvasive imaging tool to identify plaques with high-risk characteristics in patients with coronary artery disease. We sought to evaluate the clinical relevance of 18F-NaF uptake using optical coherence tomography (OCT), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The target population consisted of 51 prospectively enrolled patients (93 stenoses) who underwent 18F-NaF positron-emission tomography before invasive coronary angiography. 18F-NaF uptake was compared with IVUS- and OCT-derived plaque characteristics. In the coronary computed tomography angiography subgroup (46 lesions), qualitative lesion characteristics were compared between 18F-NaF-positive and 18F-NaF-negative plaques using adverse plaque characteristics. The plaques with 18F-NaF uptake showed significantly higher plaque burden, more frequent posterior attenuation and positive remodeling in IVUS, and significantly higher maximum lipid arc and more frequent microvessels in OCT (all P<0.05). There were no differences in minimum lumen area and area of calcium between 18F-NaF-positive and 18F-NaF-negative lesions. Among 51 lesions with 18F-NaF-positive uptake, 48 lesions (94.1%) had at least one of high-risk characteristics. The 18F-NaF tissue-to-background ratio in plaques with high-risk characteristics was significantly higher than in those without (1.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.34] versus 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.82], P<0.001 for IVUS definition; 0.76 [95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.98] versus 0.42 [95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.62], P=0.014 for OCT definition). Among the 15 lesions that met both IVUS- and OCT-defined criteria for high-risk plaque, 14 (93.3%) showed 18F-NaF-positive uptake. There was no difference in the prevalence of plaques with any adverse plaque characteristics between 18F-NaF-positive and 18F-NaF-negative plaques in the coronary computed tomography angiography subgroup (85.2% versus 78.9%; P=0.583).
CONCLUSIONS: This study's results suggest that 18F-NaF positron-emission tomography can be a useful noninvasive diagnostic tool to identify and localize plaque with high-risk characteristics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02388412.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; microvessels; sodium fluoride; tomography, optical coherence; tomography, positron-emission

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29133478     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  19 in total

Review 1.  KSNM60 in Cardiology: Regrowth After a Long Pause.

Authors:  Sang-Geon Cho; Eun Jung Kong; Won Jun Kang; Jin Chul Paeng; Hee-Seung Henry Bom; Ihnho Cho
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-08

2.  Simultaneous assessment of microcalcifications and morphological criteria of vulnerability in carotid artery plaque using hybrid 18F-NaF PET/MRI.

Authors:  Laura Mechtouff; Monica Sigovan; Philippe Douek; Nicolas Costes; Didier Le Bars; Adeline Mansuy; Julie Haesebaert; Alexandre Bani-Sadr; Jérémie Tordo; Patrick Feugier; Antoine Millon; Stéphane Luong; Salim Si-Mohamed; Diane Collet-Benzaquen; Emmanuelle Canet-Soulas; Thomas Bochaton; Claire Crola Da Silva; Alexandre Paccalet; David Magne; Yves Berthezene; Norbert Nighoghossian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  In search of the vulnerable patient or the vulnerable plaque: 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography for cardiovascular risk stratification.

Authors:  Jamie W Bellinge; Roslyn J Francis; Kamran Majeed; Gerald F Watts; Carl J Schultz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Predictors of 18F-sodium fluoride uptake in patients with stable coronary artery disease and adverse plaque features on computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Jacek Kwiecinski; Damini Dey; Sebastien Cadet; Sang-Eun Lee; Balaji Tamarappoo; Yuka Otaki; Phi T Huynh; John D Friedman; Mark R Dweck; David E Newby; Mijin Yun; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  Vulnerable plaque imaging using 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jacek Kwiecinski; Piotr J Slomka; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Optimization of reconstruction and quantification of motion-corrected coronary PET-CT.

Authors:  Mhairi K Doris; Yuka Otaki; Sandeep K Krishnan; Jacek Kwiecinski; Mathieu Rubeaux; Adam Alessio; Tinsu Pan; Sebastien Cadet; Damini Dey; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Coronary 18F-Sodium Fluoride Uptake Predicts Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Jacek Kwiecinski; Evangelos Tzolos; Philip D Adamson; Sebastien Cadet; Alastair J Moss; Nikhil Joshi; Michelle C Williams; Edwin J R van Beek; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  The importance of standards in medicine.

Authors:  Paolo Raggi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Sodium fluoride in cardiovascular disorders: A systematic review.

Authors:  Beatriz Isabel Silva Mendes; Manuel Oliveira-Santos; Maria João Vidigal Ferreira
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  18F-Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF) for Imaging Microcalcification Activity in the Cardiovascular System.

Authors:  Evangelos Tzolos; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 8.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.