Literature DB >> 29946922

A model of motor and sensory axon activation in the median nerve using surface electrical stimulation.

Jessica L Gaines1, Kathleen E Finn1, Julia P Slopsema1,2, Lane A Heyboer1, Katharine H Polasek3.   

Abstract

Surface electrical stimulation has the potential to be a powerful and non-invasive treatment for a variety of medical conditions but currently it is difficult to obtain consistent evoked responses. A viable clinical system must be able to adapt to variations in individuals to produce repeatable results. To more fully study the effect of these variations without performing exhaustive testing on human subjects, a system of computer models was created to predict motor and sensory axon activation in the median nerve due to surface electrical stimulation at the elbow. An anatomically-based finite element model of the arm was built to accurately predict voltages resulting from surface electrical stimulation. In addition, two axon models were developed based on previously published models to incorporate physiological differences between sensory and motor axons. This resulted in axon models that could reproduce experimental results for conduction velocity, strength-duration curves and activation threshold. Differences in experimentally obtained action potential shape between the motor and sensory axons were reflected in the models. The models predicted a lower threshold for sensory axons than motor axons of the same diameter, allowing a range of sensory axons to be activated before any motor axons. This system of models will be a useful tool for development of surface electrical stimulation as a method to target specific neural functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axon model; Finite element model; Motor axon model; Sensory axon model; Surface electrical stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29946922     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-018-0689-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  41 in total

1.  The relative excitability and conduction velocity of sensory and motor nerve fibres in man.

Authors:  G D DAWSON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1956-02-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Differences in the recovery of excitability in sensory and motor axons of human median nerve.

Authors:  M C Kiernan; I Mogyoros; D Burke
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Latent addition in motor and sensory fibres of human peripheral nerve.

Authors:  H Bostock; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Andrew G Richardson; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Bioelectronic medicines: a research roadmap.

Authors:  Karen Birmingham; Viviana Gradinaru; Polina Anikeeva; Warren M Grill; Victor Pikov; Bryan McLaughlin; Pankaj Pasricha; Douglas Weber; Kip Ludwig; Kristoffer Famm
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Efficiency analysis of waveform shape for electrical excitation of nerve fibers.

Authors:  Amorn Wongsarnpigoon; John P Woock; Warren M Grill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  A model of the electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibres based on human data.

Authors:  W A Wesselink; J Holsheimer; H B Boom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Differential sensitivity of motor and sensory fibres in human ulnar nerve.

Authors:  J L Veale; R F Mark; S Rees
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Electrical and morphological factors influencing the depolarizing after-potential in rat and lizard myelinated axons.

Authors:  G David; B Modney; K A Scappaticci; J N Barrett; E F Barrett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  A model for transcutaneous current stimulation: simulations and experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Kuhn; Thierry Keller; Marc Lawrence; Manfred Morari
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Tutorial: a computational framework for the design and optimization of peripheral neural interfaces.

Authors:  Simone Romeni; Giacomo Valle; Alberto Mazzoni; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for chronic pain modulates Aβ-fiber activity but not C-fiber activity: A computational modeling study.

Authors:  Robert D Graham; Tim M Bruns; Bo Duan; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  High-resolution computational modeling of the current flow in the outer ear during transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS).

Authors:  Erica Kreisberg; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Niranjan Khadka; Abhishek Datta; Bashar W Badran; J Douglas Bremner; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Computational modelling of nerve stimulation and recording with peripheral visceral neural interfaces.

Authors:  Calvin D Eiber; Sophie C Payne; Natalia P Biscola; Leif A Havton; Janet R Keast; Peregrine B Osborne; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion using an Injectrode®.

Authors:  Ashley N Dalrymple; Jordyn E Ting; Rohit Bose; James K Trevathan; Stephan Nieuwoudt; Scott F Lempka; Manfred Franke; Kip A Ludwig; Andrew J Shoffstall; Lee E Fisher; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Evoked Potentials Recorded From the Spinal Cord During Neurostimulation for Pain: A Computational Modeling Study.

Authors:  Carlos J Anaya; Hans J Zander; Robert D Graham; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-06-19

Review 7.  Validation of a parameterized, open-source model of nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Jesse E Bucksot; Collin R Chandler; Navaporn M Intharuck; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Simulating bidirectional peripheral neural interfaces in EIDORS.

Authors:  Calvin D Eiber; Janet R Keast; Peregrine B Osborne
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2020-07

9.  A Lead Field Two-Domain Model for Longitudinal Neural Tracts-Analytical Framework and Implications for Signal Bandwidth.

Authors:  G Fischer; M Kofler; M Handler; D Baumgarten
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Gate Mechanism and Parameter Analysis of Anodal-First Waveforms for Improving Selectivity of C-Fiber Nerves.

Authors:  Siyu He; Kornkanok Tripanpitak; Yu Yoshida; Shozo Takamatsu; Shao Ying Huang; Wenwei Yu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.