Literature DB >> 34330105

Validation of a parameterized, open-source model of nerve stimulation.

Jesse E Bucksot1, Collin R Chandler1,2, Navaporn M Intharuck1, Robert L Rennaker1,3,2, Michael P Kilgard3,2, Seth A Hays1,3,2.   

Abstract

Peripheral nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for various neurological disorders. The method of activation and stimulation parameters used impact the efficacy of the therapy, which emphasizes the need for tools to model this behavior. Computational modeling of nerve stimulation has proven to be a useful tool for estimating stimulation thresholds, optimizing electrode design, and exploring previously untested stimulation methods. Despite their utility, these tools require access to and familiarity with several pieces of specialized software. A simpler, streamlined process would increase accessibility significantly. We developed an open-source, parameterized model with a simple online user interface that allows user to adjust up to 36 different parameters (https://nervestimlab.utdallas.edu). The model accurately predicts fiber activation thresholds for nerve and electrode combinations reported in literature. Additionally, it replicates characteristic differences between stimulation methods, such as lower thresholds with monopolar stimulation as compared to tripolar stimulation. The model predicted that the difference in threshold between monophasic and biphasic waveforms, a well-characterized phenomenon, is not present during stimulation with bipolar electrodes.In vivotesting on the rat sciatic nerve validated this prediction, which has not been previously reported. The accuracy of the model when compared to previous experiments, as well as the ease of use and accessibility to generate testable hypotheses, indicate that this software may represent a useful tool for a variety of nerve stimulation applications.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  method; model; nerve; stimulation; thresholding; tools

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34330105      PMCID: PMC9533340          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  35 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; E Javel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Vagus nerve stimulation potentiates hippocampal LTP in freely-moving rats.

Authors:  Yantao Zuo; Douglas C Smith; Robert A Jensen
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-01-03

3.  Current steering to control the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Vagus nerve stimulation intensity influences motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  Robert A Morrison; Daniel R Hulsey; Katherine S Adcock; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Comparative analysis of transverse intrafascicular multichannel, longitudinal intrafascicular and multipolar cuff electrodes for the selective stimulation of nerve fascicles.

Authors:  Jordi Badia; Tim Boretius; David Andreu; Christine Azevedo-Coste; Thomas Stieglitz; Xavier Navarro
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Strength-duration properties of human peripheral nerve.

Authors:  I Mogyoros; M C Kiernan; D Burke
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant depression: efficacy, side effects, and predictors of outcome.

Authors:  H A Sackeim; A J Rush; M S George; L B Marangell; M M Husain; Z Nahas; C R Johnson; S Seidman; C Giller; S Haines; R K Simpson; R R Goodman
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Posttraining electrical stimulation of vagal afferents with concomitant vagal efferent inactivation enhances memory storage processes in the rat.

Authors:  K B Clark; D C Smith; D L Hassert; R A Browning; D K Naritoku; R A Jensen
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Occipital nerve stimulation for the treatment of intractable chronic migraine headache: ONSTIM feasibility study.

Authors:  Joel R Saper; David W Dodick; Stephen D Silberstein; Sally McCarville; Mark Sun; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 10.  High-Resolution Multi-Scale Computational Model for Non-Invasive Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Dennis Q Truong; Devin K Adair; Bruce J Simon; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-10-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  Computational modelling of nerve stimulation and recording with peripheral visceral neural interfaces.

Authors:  Calvin D Eiber; Sophie C Payne; Natalia P Biscola; Leif A Havton; Janet R Keast; Peregrine B Osborne; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.