Yaniv Bar-Cohen1,2, Michael J Silka3,2, Allison C Hill3,2, Jay D Pruetz3,2, Ramen H Chmait4, Li Zhou5, Sara M Rabin5, Viktoria Norekyan5, Gerald E Loeb5. 1. Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, CA (Y.B.-C., M.J.S., A.C.H., J.D.P.). ybarcohen@chla.usc.edu. 2. Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA (Y.B.-C., M.J.S., A.C.H., J.D.P.). 3. Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, CA (Y.B.-C., M.J.S., A.C.H., J.D.P.). 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA (R.H.C.). 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (L.Z., S.M.R., V.N., G.E.L.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Permanent cardiac pacemakers require invasive procedures with complications often related to long pacemaker leads. We are developing a percutaneous pacemaker for implantation of an entire pacing system into the pericardial space. METHODS: Percutaneous micropacemaker implantations were performed in 6 pigs (27.4-34.1 kg) using subxyphoid access to the pericardial space. Modifications in the implantation methods and hardware were made after each experiment as the insertion method was optimized. In the first 5 animals, nonfunctional pacemaker devices were studied. In the final animal, a functional pacemaker was implanted. RESULTS: Successful placement of the entire nonfunctional pacing system into the pericardial space was demonstrated in 2 of the first 5 animals, and successful implantation and capture was achieved using a functional system in the last animal. A sheath was developed that allows retractable features to secure positioning within the pericardial space. In addition, a miniaturized camera with fiberoptic illumination allowed visualization of the implantation site before electrode insertion into myocardium. All animals studied during follow-up survived without symptoms after the initial postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: A novel micropacemaker system allows cardiac pacing without entering the vascular space or surgical exposure of the heart. This pericardial pacemaker system may be an option for a large number of patients currently requiring transvenous pacemakers but is particularly relevant for patients with restricted vascular access, young children, or those with congenital heart disease who require epicardial access.
BACKGROUND: Permanent cardiac pacemakers require invasive procedures with complications often related to long pacemaker leads. We are developing a percutaneous pacemaker for implantation of an entire pacing system into the pericardial space. METHODS: Percutaneous micropacemaker implantations were performed in 6 pigs (27.4-34.1 kg) using subxyphoid access to the pericardial space. Modifications in the implantation methods and hardware were made after each experiment as the insertion method was optimized. In the first 5 animals, nonfunctional pacemaker devices were studied. In the final animal, a functional pacemaker was implanted. RESULTS: Successful placement of the entire nonfunctional pacing system into the pericardial space was demonstrated in 2 of the first 5 animals, and successful implantation and capture was achieved using a functional system in the last animal. A sheath was developed that allows retractable features to secure positioning within the pericardial space. In addition, a miniaturized camera with fiberoptic illumination allowed visualization of the implantation site before electrode insertion into myocardium. All animals studied during follow-up survived without symptoms after the initial postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: A novel micropacemaker system allows cardiac pacing without entering the vascular space or surgical exposure of the heart. This pericardial pacemaker system may be an option for a large number of patients currently requiring transvenous pacemakers but is particularly relevant for patients with restricted vascular access, young children, or those with congenital heart disease who require epicardial access.
Authors: Vivek Y Reddy; Derek V Exner; Daniel J Cantillon; Rahul Doshi; T Jared Bunch; Gery F Tomassoni; Paul A Friedman; N A Mark Estes; John Ip; Imran Niazi; Kenneth Plunkitt; Rajesh Banker; James Porterfield; James E Ip; Srinivas R Dukkipati Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jan Janoušek; Irene E van Geldorp; Sylvia Krupičková; Eric Rosenthal; Kelly Nugent; Maren Tomaske; Andreas Früh; Jan Elders; Anita Hiippala; Gunter Kerst; Roman A Gebauer; Peter Kubuš; Patrick Frias; Fulvio Gabbarini; Sally-Ann Clur; Bert Nagel; Javier Ganame; John Papagiannis; Jan Marek; Svjetlana Tisma-Dupanovic; Sabrina Tsao; Jan-Hendrik Nürnberg; Christopher Wren; Mark Friedberg; Maxime de Guillebon; Julia Volaufova; Frits W Prinzen; Tammo Delhaas Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bradley C Clark; Tanya D Davis; Magdy M El-Sayed Ahmed; Robert McCarter; Nobuyuki Ishibashi; Christopher P Jordan; Timothy D Kane; Peter C W Kim; Axel Krieger; Dilip S Nath; Justin D Opfermann; Charles I Berul Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Elizabeth B Fortescue; Charles I Berul; Frank Cecchin; Edward P Walsh; John K Triedman; Mark E Alexander Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Yaniv Bar-Cohen; Gerald E Loeb; Jay D Pruetz; Michael J Silka; Catalina Guerra; Adriana N Vest; Li Zhou; Ramen H Chmait Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-03-14 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Vivek Y Reddy; Reinoud E Knops; Johannes Sperzel; Marc A Miller; Jan Petru; Jaroslav Simon; Lucie Sediva; Joris R de Groot; Fleur V Y Tjong; Peter Jacobson; Alan Ostrosff; Srinivas R Dukkipati; Jacob S Koruth; Arthur A M Wilde; Josef Kautzner; Petr Neuzil Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gerald E Loeb; Li Zhou; Kaihui Zheng; Adriana Nicholson; Raymond A Peck; Anjana Krishnan; Michael Silka; Jay Pruetz; Ramen Chmait; Yaniv Bar-Cohen Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Jay D Pruetz; Jennifer C Miller; Gerald E Loeb; Michael J Silka; Yaniv Bar-Cohen; Ramen H Chmait Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 2.344