Literature DB >> 23275383

Permanent cardiac pacing in children: choosing the optimal pacing site: a multicenter study.

Jan Janoušek1, Irene E van Geldorp, Sylvia Krupičková, Eric Rosenthal, Kelly Nugent, Maren Tomaske, Andreas Früh, Jan Elders, Anita Hiippala, Gunter Kerst, Roman A Gebauer, Peter Kubuš, Patrick Frias, Fulvio Gabbarini, Sally-Ann Clur, Bert Nagel, Javier Ganame, John Papagiannis, Jan Marek, Svjetlana Tisma-Dupanovic, Sabrina Tsao, Jan-Hendrik Nürnberg, Christopher Wren, Mark Friedberg, Maxime de Guillebon, Julia Volaufova, Frits W Prinzen, Tammo Delhaas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effects of the site of ventricular pacing on left ventricular (LV) synchrony and function in children requiring permanent pacing. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight children (aged <18 years) from 21 centers with atrioventricular block and a structurally normal heart undergoing permanent pacing were studied cross-sectionally. Median age at evaluation was 11.2 (interquartile range, 6.3-15.0) years. Median pacing duration was 5.4 (interquartile range, 3.1-8.8) years. Pacing sites were the free wall of the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (n=8), lateral RV (n=44), RV apex (n=61), RV septum (n=29), LV apex (n=12), LV midlateral wall (n=17), and LV base (n=7). LV synchrony, pump function, and contraction efficiency were significantly affected by pacing site and were superior in children paced at the LV apex/LV midlateral wall. LV dyssynchrony correlated inversely with LV ejection fraction (R=0.80, P=0.031). Pacing from the RV outflow tract/lateral RV predicted significantly decreased LV function (LV ejection fraction <45%; odds ratio, 10.72; confidence interval, 2.07-55.60; P=0.005), whereas LV apex/LV midlateral wall pacing was associated with preserved LV function (LV ejection fraction ≥55%; odds ratio, 8.26; confidence interval, 1.46-47.62; P=0.018). Presence of maternal autoantibodies, gender, age at implantation, duration of pacing, DDD mode, and QRS duration had no significant impact on LV ejection fraction.
CONCLUSIONS: The site of ventricular pacing has a major impact on LV mechanical synchrony, efficiency, and pump function in children who require lifelong pacing. Of the sites studied, LV apex/LV midlateral wall pacing has the greatest potential to prevent pacing-induced reduction of cardiac pump function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23275383     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.115428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  25 in total

1.  Common sense or evidence: an optimal place for right and left ventricular leads?

Authors:  I Eli Ovsyshcher
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Letter to the Editor: His Bundle Pacing: A New Frontier in the Treatment of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Zografos Theodoros
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Pacing and Defibrillators in Complex Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Henry Chubb; Mark O'Neill; Eric Rosenthal
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-05

4.  Minimally Invasive Implantation of a Micropacemaker Into the Pericardial Space.

Authors:  Yaniv Bar-Cohen; Michael J Silka; Allison C Hill; Jay D Pruetz; Ramen H Chmait; Li Zhou; Sara M Rabin; Viktoria Norekyan; Gerald E Loeb
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-07

5.  Choice of Ventricular Pacing Site: the End of Non-physiological, Apical Ventricular Pacing?

Authors:  Demosthenes G Katritsis
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-12

6.  Is ventricular sensing always right, when it is left?

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Giulia de Zan; Giulia Massaro; Andrea Angeletti; Cristian Martignani; Giuseppe Boriani; Igor Diemberger; Matteo Ziacchi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Which Patients with AV Block Should Receive CRT Pacing?

Authors:  Tanyanan Tanawuttiwat; Alan Cheng
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 8.  Electromechanical dyssynchrony and resynchronization of the failing heart.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kirk; David A Kass
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jan Janoušek; Peter Kubuš
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-05-25

10.  Device therapy in children with and without congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jan Janoušek
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.