Literature DB >> 29943315

Genomic Selection Using BayesCπ and GBLUP for Resistance Against Edwardsiella tarda in Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus).

Yang Liu1,2, Sheng Lu1,2,3, Feng Liu1,2,4, Changwei Shao1,2, Qian Zhou1,2, Na Wang1,2, Yangzhen Li1,2, Yingming Yang1,2, Yingping Zhang1,2, Hejun Sun1,2, Weiwei Zheng1,2, Songlin Chen5,6.   

Abstract

The Japanese flounder is one of the most widely farmed economic flatfish species throughout eastern Asia including China, Korea, and Japan. Edwardsiella tarda is a major species of pathogenic bacteria that causes ascites disease and, consequently, a huge economy loss for Japanese flounder farming. After generation selection, traditional breeding methods can hardly improve the E. tarda resistance effectively. Genomic selection is an effective way to predict the breeding potential of parents and has rarely been used in aquatic breeding. In this study, we chose 931 individuals from 90 families, challenged by E. tarda from 2013 to 2015 as a reference population and 71 parents of these families as selection candidates. 1,934,475 markers were detected via genome sequencing and applied in this study. Two different methods, BayesCπ and GBLUP, were used for genomic prediction. In the reference population, two methods led to the same accuracy (0.946) and Pearson's correlation results between phenotype and genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) of BayesCπ and GBLUP were 0.912 and 0.761, respectively. In selection candidates, GEBVs from two methods were highly similar (0.980). A comparison of GEBV with the survival rate of families that were structured by selection candidates showed correlations of 0.662 and 0.665, respectively. This study established a genomic selection method for the Japanese flounder and for the first time applied this to E. tarda resistance breeding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BayesCπ; Edwardsiella tarda; GBLUP; Genomic selection; Japanese flounder

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29943315     DOI: 10.1007/s10126-018-9839-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)        ISSN: 1436-2228            Impact factor:   3.619


  36 in total

1.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P M Visscher; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  The genome and transcriptome of Japanese flounder provide insights into flatfish asymmetry.

Authors:  Changwei Shao; Baolong Bao; Zhiyuan Xie; Xinye Chen; Bo Li; Xiaodong Jia; Qiulin Yao; Guillermo Ortí; Wenhui Li; Xihong Li; Kristin Hamre; Juan Xu; Lei Wang; Fangyuan Chen; Yongsheng Tian; Alex M Schreiber; Na Wang; Fen Wei; Jilin Zhang; Zhongdian Dong; Lei Gao; Junwei Gai; Takashi Sakamoto; Sudong Mo; Wenjun Chen; Qiong Shi; Hui Li; Yunji Xiu; Yangzhen Li; Wenteng Xu; Zhiyi Shi; Guojie Zhang; Deborah M Power; Qingyin Wang; Manfred Schartl; Songlin Chen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Genomic Selection Using Extreme Phenotypes and Pre-Selection of SNPs in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea).

Authors:  Linsong Dong; Shijun Xiao; Junwei Chen; Liang Wan; Zhiyong Wang
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Multiple Novel QTL Associated with Low Oxygen Tolerance in Hybrid Catfish.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Zhong; Xiaozhu Wang; Tao Zhou; Yulin Jin; Suxu Tan; Chen Jiang; Xin Geng; Ning Li; Huitong Shi; Qifan Zeng; Yujia Yang; Zihao Yuan; Lisui Bao; Shikai Liu; Changxu Tian; Eric Peatman; Qi Li; Zhanjiang Liu
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.

Authors:  Thuy T T Nguyen; Phil J Bowman; Mekonnen Haile-Mariam; Jennie E Pryce; Benjamin J Hayes
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Comparing deregression methods for genomic prediction of test-day traits in dairy cattle.

Authors:  H R de Oliveira; F F Silva; L F Brito; A R Guarini; J Jamrozik; F S Schenkel
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Performance of genomic selection in mice.

Authors:  Andrés Legarra; Christèle Robert-Granié; Eduardo Manfredi; Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.

Authors:  Hongding Gao; Ole F Christensen; Per Madsen; Ulrik S Nielsen; Yuan Zhang; Mogens S Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  Selma Forni; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  7 in total

1.  Predicting Growth Traits with Genomic Selection Methods in Zhikong Scallop (Chlamys farreri).

Authors:  Yangfan Wang; Guidong Sun; Qifan Zeng; Zhihui Chen; Xiaoli Hu; Hengde Li; Shi Wang; Zhenmin Bao
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Improved Stability and Activity of a Marine Peptide-N6NH2 against Edwardsiella tarda and Its Preliminary Application in Fish.

Authors:  Huihui Han; Ting Li; Zhenlong Wang; Da Teng; Ruoyu Mao; Ya Hao; Na Yang; Xiumin Wang; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 3.  Toward Genome-Based Selection in Asian Seabass: What Can We Learn From Other Food Fishes and Farm Animals?

Authors:  László Orbán; Xueyan Shen; Norman Phua; László Varga
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Evaluation of Bayesian alphabet and GBLUP based on different marker density for genomic prediction in Alpine Merino sheep.

Authors:  Shaohua Zhu; Tingting Guo; Chao Yuan; Jianbin Liu; Jianye Li; Mei Han; Hongchang Zhao; Yi Wu; Weibo Sun; Xijun Wang; Tianxiang Wang; Jigang Liu; Christian Keambou Tiambo; Yaojing Yue; Bohui Yang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  First genomic prediction and genome-wide association for complex growth-related traits in Rock Bream (Oplegnathus fasciatus).

Authors:  Jie Gong; Ji Zhao; Qiaozhen Ke; Bijun Li; Zhixiong Zhou; Jiaying Wang; Tao Zhou; Weiqiang Zheng; Peng Xu
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Evaluation of Genomic Selection for Seven Economic Traits in Yellow Drum (Nibea albiflora).

Authors:  Guijia Liu; Linsong Dong; Linlin Gu; Zhaofang Han; Wenjing Zhang; Ming Fang; Zhiyong Wang
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Prediction of genomic breeding values based on pre-selected SNPs using ssGBLUP, WssGBLUP and BayesB for Edwardsiellosis resistance in Japanese flounder.

Authors:  Sheng Lu; Yang Liu; Xijiang Yu; Yangzhen Li; Yingming Yang; Min Wei; Qian Zhou; Jie Wang; Yingping Zhang; Weiwei Zheng; Songlin Chen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.