Literature DB >> 27037467

Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.

Thuy T T Nguyen1, Phil J Bowman2, Mekonnen Haile-Mariam2, Jennie E Pryce3, Benjamin J Hayes3.   

Abstract

Temperature and humidity levels above a certain threshold decrease milk production in dairy cattle, and genetic variation is associated with the amount of lost production. To enable selection for improved heat tolerance, the aim of this study was to develop genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for heat tolerance in dairy cattle. Heat tolerance was defined as the rate of decline in production under heat stress. We combined herd test-day recording data from 366,835 Holstein and 76,852 Jersey cows with daily temperature and humidity measurements from weather stations closest to the tested herds for test days between 2003 and 2013. We used daily mean values of temperature-humidity index averaged for the day of test and the 4 previous days as the measure of heat stress. Tolerance to heat stress was estimated for each cow using a random regression model with a common threshold of temperature-humidity index=60 for all cows. The slope solutions for cows from this model were used to define the daughter trait deviations of their sires. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction was used to calculate GEBV for heat tolerance for milk, fat, and protein yield. Two reference populations were used, the first consisted of genotyped sires only (2,300 Holstein and 575 Jersey sires), and the other included genotyped sires and cows (2,189 Holstein and 1,188 Jersey cows). The remainder of the genotyped sires were used as a validation set. All animals had genotypes for 632,003 single nucleotide polymorphisms. When using only genotyped sires in the reference set and only the first parity data, the accuracy of GEBV for heat tolerance in relation to changes in milk, fat, and protein yield were 0.48, 0.50, and 0.49 in the Holstein validation sires and 0.44, 0.61, and 0.53 in the Jersey validation sires, respectively. Some slight improvement in the accuracy of prediction was achieved when cows were included in the reference population for Holsteins. No clear improvements in the accuracy of genomic prediction were observed when data from the second and third parities were included. Correlations of GEBV for heat tolerance with Australian Breeding Values for other traits suggested heat tolerance had a favorable genetic correlation with fertility (0.29-0.39 in Holsteins and 0.15-0.27 in Jerseys), but unfavorable correlations for some production traits. Options to improve heat tolerance with genomic selection in Australian dairy cattle are discussed.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomic selection; heat tolerance; milk production; temperature-humidity index

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037467     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  29 in total

1.  Genomic Selection Using BayesCπ and GBLUP for Resistance Against Edwardsiella tarda in Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus).

Authors:  Yang Liu; Sheng Lu; Feng Liu; Changwei Shao; Qian Zhou; Na Wang; Yangzhen Li; Yingming Yang; Yingping Zhang; Hejun Sun; Weiwei Zheng; Songlin Chen
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Improving Genomic Selection for Heat Tolerance in Dairy Cattle: Current Opportunities and Future Directions.

Authors:  Evans K Cheruiyot; Mekonnen Haile-Mariam; Benjamin G Cocks; Jennie E Pryce
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Little genetic variability in resilience among cattle exists for a range of performance traits across herds in Ireland differing in Fasciola hepatica prevalence.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; David A Graham; Michael L Doherty; Astrid Blom; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  1HNMR-Based metabolomic profiling method to develop plasma biomarkers for sensitivity to chronic heat stress in growing pigs.

Authors:  Samir Dou; Nathalie Villa-Vialaneix; Laurence Liaubet; Yvon Billon; Mario Giorgi; Hélène Gilbert; Jean-Luc Gourdine; Juliette Riquet; David Renaudeau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Application of a Bayesian non-linear model hybrid scheme to sequence data for genomic prediction and QTL mapping.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen; Iona M MacLeod; Jennie E Pryce; Michael E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Heat Stress in Dairy Cattle Alters Lipid Composition of Milk.

Authors:  Z Liu; V Ezernieks; J Wang; N Wanni Arachchillage; J B Garner; W J Wales; B G Cocks; S Rochfort
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Spatially explicit estimation of heat stress-related impacts of climate change on the milk production of dairy cows in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Nándor Fodor; Andreas Foskolos; Cairistiona F E Topp; Jon M Moorby; László Pásztor; Christine H Foyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Heat Stress Impacts on Lactating Cows Grazing Australian Summer Pastures on an Automatic Robotic Dairy.

Authors:  Richard Osei-Amponsah; Frank R Dunshea; Brian J Leury; Long Cheng; Brendan Cullen; Aleena Joy; Archana Abhijith; Michael H Zhang; Surinder S Chauhan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Genomic Selection Improves Heat Tolerance in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  J B Garner; M L Douglas; S R O Williams; W J Wales; L C Marett; T T T Nguyen; C M Reich; B J Hayes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Liver metabolic perturbations of heat-stressed lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Caiyun Fan; Di Su; He Tian; Xiaojiao Li; Yu Li; Lei Ran; Ruiting Hu; Jianbo Cheng
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.