Literature DB >> 29933030

Profound differences in fat versus carbohydrate preferences in CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice: Role of fat taste.

Anthony Sclafani1, Austin S Vural2, Karen Ackroff2.   

Abstract

In a nutrient self-selection study, CAST/EiJ mice consumed more carbohydrate than fat while C57BL/6J (B6) mice showed the opposite preference. The present study revealed similar strain differences in preferences for isocaloric fat (Intralipid) and carbohydrate (sucrose, maltodextrin) solutions in chow-fed mice. In initial 2-day choice tests, percent fat intakes of CAST and B6 mice were 4-9% and 71-81% respectively. In subsequent nutrient vs. water tests, CAST mice consumed considerably less fat but not carbohydrate compared to B6 mice. Orosensory rather than postoral factors are implicated in the very low fat preference and intake of CAST mice. This is supported by results of a choice test with Intralipid mixed with non-nutritive sweeteners vs. non-sweet maltodextrin. The preference of CAST mice for sweetened fat exceeded that of B6 mice (94 vs. 74%) and absolute fat intakes were similar in the two strains. When given unsweetened Intralipid vs. water tests at ascending fat concentrations CAST mice displayed reduced fat preferences at 0.1-5% and reduced intakes at 0.5-5% concentrations, compared to B6 mice. The differential fat preferences of CAST and B6 mice may reflect differences in fat taste sensing or in central neural processes related to fat selection.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intralipid; Maltodextrin; Saccharin; Strain differences; Sucralose; Sucrose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29933030      PMCID: PMC6082157          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  36 in total

1.  Nutrient preference and diet-induced adiposity in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; D R Reed; M G Tordoff; R A Price; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Leptin as a modulator of sweet taste sensitivities in mice.

Authors:  K Kawai; K Sugimoto; K Nakashima; H Miura; Y Ninomiya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic variance contributes to ingestive processes: a survey of eleven inbred mouse strains for fat (Intralipid) intake.

Authors:  Sarah R Lewis; Cheryl Dym; Christina Chai; Amreeta Singh; Benjamin Kest; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-10-09

6.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

7.  Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.

Authors:  J W Nissenbaum; A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 9.  Carbohydrate taste, appetite, and obesity: an overview.

Authors:  A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Leptin modulates nutrient reward via inhibitory galanin action on orexin neurons.

Authors:  Amanda Laque; Sangho Yu; Emily Qualls-Creekmore; Sarah Gettys; Candice Schwartzenburg; Kelly Bui; Christopher Rhodes; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud; Christopher D Morrison; Brenda K Richards; Heike Münzberg
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 7.422

View more
  2 in total

1.  Administration of Exendin-4 but not CCK alters lick responses and trial initiation to sucrose and intralipid during brief-access tests.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  The neural basis of sugar preference.

Authors:  Winston W Liu; Diego V Bohórquez
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 38.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.