Literature DB >> 29932429

Electric field measurement of two commercial active/sham coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

J Evan Smith1, Angel V Peterchev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sham TMS coils isolate the ancillary effects of their active counterparts but typically induce low-strength electric fields (E-fields) in the brain, which could be biologically active. We measured the E-fields induced by two pairs of commonly-used commercial active/sham coils. APPROACH: E-field distributions of the active and sham configurations of the Magstim 70 mm AFC and MagVenture Cool-B65 A/P coils were measured over a 7 cm-radius, hemispherical grid approximating the cortical surface. Peak E-field strength was recorded over a range of pulse amplitudes. MAIN
RESULTS: The Magstim and MagVenture shams induce peak E-fields corresponding to 25.3% and 7.72% of their respective active values. The MagVenture sham has an E-field distribution shaped like its active counterpart. The Magstim sham induces nearly zero E-field under the coil's center, and its peak E-field forms a diffuse oval 3-7 cm from the center. Electrical scalp stimulation paired with the MagVenture sham is estimated to increase the sham E-field in the brain up to 10%. SIGNIFICANCE: Different commercial shams induce different E-field strengths and distributions in the brain, which should be considered in interpreting outcomes of sham stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29932429      PMCID: PMC6125221          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aace89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  16 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with electronically switchable active and sham modes.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

2.  Computational and experimental analysis of TMS-induced electric field vectors critical to neuronal activation.

Authors:  Todd D Krieg; Felipe S Salinas; Shalini Narayana; Peter T Fox; David J Mogul
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Transcranial low voltage pulsed electromagnetic fields in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Klaus Martiny; Marianne Lunde; Per Bech
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Rapid mood-elevating effects of low field magnetic stimulation in depression.

Authors:  Michael L Rohan; Rinah T Yamamoto; Caitlin T Ravichandran; Kenroy R Cayetano; Oscar G Morales; David P Olson; Gordana Vitaliano; Steven M Paul; Bruce M Cohen
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Marisa Ferro; Massimo Cincotta; Monica Ulivelli; Sabina Bartalini; Carlo Miniussi; Fabio Giovannelli; Stefano Passero
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?

Authors:  Ashley B Arana; Jeffery J Borckardt; Raffaella Ricci; Berry Anderson; Xingbao Li; Katherine J Linder; James Long; Harold A Sackeim; Mark S George
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.635

9.  Low-field magnetic stimulation in bipolar depression using an MRI-based stimulator.

Authors:  Michael Rohan; Aimee Parow; Andrew L Stoll; Christina Demopulos; Seth Friedman; Stephen Dager; John Hennen; Bruce M Cohen; Perry F Renshaw
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Wynn Legon; Jerel Mueller; Aaron Barbour; Walter Paulus; William J Tyler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  11 in total

1.  Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Leon Morales-Quezada; Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza; Dian Zeng; Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez; Isadora Santos Ferreira; Pedro Henrique Lucena; Dante Duarte; Fernanda Lopes; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Luiz Vicente Rizzo; Erica C Camargo; David J Lin; Nicole Mazwi; Qing Mei Wang; Randie Black-Schaffer; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  TAP: targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Moritz Dannhauer; Ziping Huang; Lysianne Beynel; Eleanor Wood; Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Cognitive Enhancing Effect of High-Frequency Neuronavigated rTMS in Chronic Schizophrenia Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind Controlled 32-Week Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Mei Hong Xiu; Heng Yong Guan; Jian Min Zhao; Ke Qiang Wang; Yan Fen Pan; Xiu Ru Su; Yu Hong Wang; Jin Ming Guo; Long Jiang; Hong Yu Liu; Shi Guang Sun; Hao Ran Wu; Han Song Geng; Xiao Wen Liu; Hui Jing Yu; Bao Chun Wei; Xi Po Li; Tammy Trinh; Shu Ping Tan; Xiang Yang Zhang
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive visual cortex does not lead to changes in motion discrimination.

Authors:  Olga Lucia Gamboa; Alexandra Brito; Zachary Abzug; Tracy D'Arbeloff; Lysianne Beynel; Erik A Wing; Moritz Dannhauer; Hannah Palmer; Susan A Hilbig; Courtney A Crowell; Sicong Liu; Rachel Donaldson; Roberto Cabeza; Simon W Davis; Angel V Peterchev; Marc A Sommer; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Site-Specific Effects of Online rTMS during a Working Memory Task in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Simon W Davis; Courtney A Crowell; Moritz Dannhauer; Wesley Lim; Hannah Palmer; Susan A Hilbig; Alexandra Brito; Connor Hile; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev; Roberto Cabeza; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-27

6.  Neuromuscular magnetic stimulation counteracts muscle decline in ALS patients: results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

Authors:  Antonio Musarò; Gabriella Dobrowolny; Chiara Cambieri; Emanuela Onesti; Marco Ceccanti; Vittorio Frasca; Annalinda Pisano; Bruna Cerbelli; Elisa Lepore; Gabriele Ruffolo; Pierangelo Cifelli; Cristina Roseti; Carla Giordano; Maria Cristina Gori; Eleonora Palma; Maurizio Inghilleri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Network-based rTMS to modulate working memory: The difficult choice of effective parameters for online interventions.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Moritz Dannhauer; Hannah Palmer; Susan A Hilbig; Courtney A Crowell; Joyce E-H Wang; Andrew M Michael; Eleanor A Wood; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev; Roberto Cabeza; Simon W Davis; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Probing regional cortical excitability via input-output properties using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography coupling.

Authors:  Estelle Raffin; Sylvain Harquel; Brice Passera; Alan Chauvin; Thierry Bougerol; Olivier David
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  High-frequency neuronavigated rTMS effect on clinical symptoms and cognitive dysfunction: a pilot double-blind, randomized controlled study in Veterans with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Heng Yong Guan; Jian Min Zhao; Ke Qiang Wang; Xiu Ru Su; Yan Fen Pan; Jin Ming Guo; Long Jiang; Yu Hong Wang; Hong Yu Liu; Shi Guang Sun; Hao Ran Wu; Yan Ping Ren; Han Song Geng; Xiao Wen Liu; Hui Jing Yu; Bao Chun Wei; Xi Po Li; Hanjing Emily Wu; Shu Ping Tan; Mei Hong Xiu; Xiang Yang Zhang
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Assessing differential effects of single and accelerated low-frequency rTMS to the visual cortex on GABA and glutamate concentrations.

Authors:  Sara A Rafique; Jennifer K E Steeves
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.