Literature DB >> 32413540

Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive visual cortex does not lead to changes in motion discrimination.

Olga Lucia Gamboa1, Alexandra Brito1, Zachary Abzug2, Tracy D'Arbeloff3, Lysianne Beynel1, Erik A Wing4, Moritz Dannhauer1, Hannah Palmer1, Susan A Hilbig1, Courtney A Crowell1, Sicong Liu1, Rachel Donaldson1, Roberto Cabeza5, Simon W Davis6, Angel V Peterchev7, Marc A Sommer8, Lawrence G Appelbaum9.   

Abstract

The perception of visual motion is dependent on a set of occipitotemporal regions that are readily accessible to neuromodulation. The current study tested if paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ppTMS) could modulate motion perception by stimulating the occipital cortex as participants viewed near-threshold motion dot stimuli. In this sham-controlled study, fifteen subjects completed two sessions. On the first visit, resting motor threshold (RMT) was assessed, and participants performed an adaptive direction discrimination task to determine individual motion sensitivity. During the second visit, subjects performed the task with three difficulty levels as TMS pulses were delivered 150 and 50 ms prior to motion stimulus onset at 120% RMT, under the logic that the cumulative inhibitory effect of these pulses would alter motion sensitivity. ppTMS was delivered at one of two locations: 3 cm dorsal and 5 cm lateral to inion (scalp-based coordinate), or at the site of peak activation for "motion" according to the NeuroSynth fMRI database (meta-analytic coordinate). Sham stimulation was delivered on one-third of trials by tilting the coil 90°. Analyses showed no significant active-versus-sham effects of ppTMS when stimulation was delivered to the meta-analytic (p = 0.15) or scalp-based coordinates (p = 0.17), which were separated by 29 mm on average. Active-versus-sham stimulation differences did not interact with either stimulation location (p = 0.12) or difficulty (p = 0.33). These findings fail to support the hypothesis that long-interval ppTMS recruits inhibitory processes in motion-sensitive cortex but must be considered within the limited parameters used in this design.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motion Sensitive Cortex; Paired Pulse TMS; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Visual Motion; hMT+

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32413540      PMCID: PMC7313683          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  39 in total

1.  Human motor evoked responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; A Pascual-Leone; E M Wassermann; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-12

2.  Paired pulse TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial perception.

Authors:  Brigida Fierro; Filippo Brighina; Giuseppe Giglia; Antonio Palermo; Margherita Francolini; Simona Scalia
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  GABA and cortical inhibition in motor and non-motor regions using combined TMS-EEG: a time analysis.

Authors:  Paul B Fitzgerald; Jerome J Maller; Kate Hoy; Faranak Farzan; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS.

Authors:  Alexander T Sack; Axel Kohler; David E J Linden; Rainer Goebel; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans.

Authors:  L M Vaina; J Solomon; S Chowdhury; P Sinha; J W Belliveau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception.

Authors:  G Beckers; S Zeki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kujirai; M D Caramia; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; A Ferbert; S Wroe; P Asselman; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  A TMS study on the contribution of visual area V5 to the perception of implied motion in art and its appreciation.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Susanna Schiavi; Juha Silvanto; Marcos Nadal
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.065

9.  Physiological Signal Variability in hMT+ Reflects Performance on a Direction Discrimination Task.

Authors:  Magdalena G Wutte; Michael T Smith; Virginia L Flanagin; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-08-02

10.  Visual area V5/hMT+ contributes to perception of tactile motion direction: a TMS study.

Authors:  Tomohiro Amemiya; Brianna Beck; Vincent Walsh; Hiroaki Gomi; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intensity- and timing-dependent modulation of motion perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex.

Authors:  Olga Lucia Gamboa Arana; Hannah Palmer; Moritz Dannhauer; Connor Hile; Sicong Liu; Rena Hamdan; Alexandra Brito; Roberto Cabeza; Simon W Davis; Angel V Peterchev; Marc A Sommer; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Effects of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Limb Dystonia in Patients With Wilson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Wenjie Hao; Taohua Wei; Wenming Yang; Yue Yang; Ting Cheng; Xiang Li; Wei Dong; Hailin Jiang; Nannan Qian; Han Wang; Meixia Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.