Literature DB >> 14702256

Low-field magnetic stimulation in bipolar depression using an MRI-based stimulator.

Michael Rohan1, Aimee Parow, Andrew L Stoll, Christina Demopulos, Seth Friedman, Stephen Dager, John Hennen, Bruce M Cohen, Perry F Renshaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anecdotal reports have suggested mood improvement in patients with bipolar disorder immediately after they underwent an echo-planar magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (EP-MRSI) procedure that can be performed within clinical MR system limits. This study evaluated possible mood improvement associated with this procedure.
METHOD: The mood states of subjects in an ongoing EP-MRSI study of bipolar disorder were assessed by using the Brief Affect Scale, a structured mood rating scale, immediately before and after an EP-MRSI session. Sham EP-MRSI was administered to a comparison group of subjects with bipolar disorder, and actual EP-MRSI was administered to a comparison group of healthy subjects. The characteristics of the electric fields generated by the EP-MRSI scan were analyzed.
RESULTS: Mood improvement was reported by 23 of 30 bipolar disorder subjects who received the actual EP-MRSI examination, by three of 10 bipolar disorder subjects who received sham EP-MRSI, and by four of 14 healthy comparison subjects who received actual EP-MRSI. Significant differences in mood improvement were found between the bipolar disorder subjects who received actual EP-MRSI and those who received sham EP-MRSI, and, among subjects who received actual EP-MRSI, between the healthy subjects and the bipolar disorder subjects and to a lesser extent between the unmedicated bipolar disorder subjects and the bipolar disorder subjects who were taking medication. The electric fields generated by the EP-MRSI scan were smaller (0.7 V/m) than fields used in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment of depression (1-500 V/m) and also extended uniformly throughout the head, unlike the highly nonuniform fields used in rTMS. The EP-MRSI waveform, a 1-kHz train of monophasic trapezoidal gradient pulses, differed from that used in rTMS.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that the EP-MRSI scan induces electric fields that are associated with reported mood improvement in subjects with bipolar disorder. The findings are similar to those for rTMS depression treatments, although the waveform used in EP-MRSI differs from that used in rTMS. Further investigation of the mechanism of EP-MRSI is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14702256     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.1.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  25 in total

Review 1.  Somatic treatments for mood disorders.

Authors:  Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Research applications of magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Stephen R Dager; Neva M Corrigan; Todd L Richards; Stefan Posse
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04

3.  Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field exposure can alter neuroprocessing in humans.

Authors:  John A Robertson; Jean Théberge; Julie Weller; Dick J Drost; Frank S Prato; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Redesigning existing transcranial magnetic stimulation coils to reduce energy: application to low field magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Boshuo Wang; Michael R Shen; Zhi-De Deng; J Evan Smith; Joseph J Tharayil; Clement J Gurrey; Luis J Gomez; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Higuchi's fractal dimension for analysis of the effect of external periodic stressor on electrical oscillations in the brain.

Authors:  Hiie Hinrikus; Maie Bachmann; Deniss Karai; Włodzimierz Klonowski; Jaanus Lass; Pavel Stepien; Robert Stepien; Viiu Tuulik
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Exposure to a specific pulsed low-frequency magnetic field: a double-blind placebo-controlled study of effects on pain ratings in rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia patients.

Authors:  N M Shupak; Julia C McKay; Warren R Nielson; Gary B Rollman; Frank S Prato; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  Low-Field Magnetic Stimulation Accelerates the Differentiation of Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells via Non-canonical TGF-β Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Natalia Dolgova; Zelan Wei; Brandon Spink; Le Gui; Qinyun Hua; Davin Truong; Zhen Zhang; Yanbo Zhang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Double-blind, proof-of-concept (POC) trial of Low-Field Magnetic Stimulation (LFMS) augmentation of antidepressant therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; Marlene P Freeman; Martina Flynn; Bettina B Hoeppner; Richard Shelton; Dan V Iosifescu; James W Murrough; David Mischoulon; Cristina Cusin; Mark Rapaport; Boadie W Dunlop; Madhukar H Trivedi; Manish Jha; Gerard Sanacora; Gretchen Hermes; George I Papakostas
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Signatures of depression in non-stationary biometric time series.

Authors:  Milka Culic; Biljana Gjoneska; Hiie Hinrikus; Magnus Jändel; Wlodzimierz Klonowski; Hans Liljenström; Nada Pop-Jordanova; Dan Psatta; Dietrich von Rosen; Björn Wahlund
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.