Literature DB >> 29925040

Cellular trajectories and molecular mechanisms of iPSC reprogramming.

Effie Apostolou1, Matthias Stadtfeld2.   

Abstract

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has solidified the concept of transcription factors as major players in controlling cell identity and provided a tractable tool to study how somatic cell identity can be dismantled and pluripotency established. A number of landmark studies have established hallmarks and roadmaps of iPSC formation by describing relative kinetics of transcriptional, protein and epigenetic changes, including alterations in DNA methylation and histone modifications. Recently, technological advancements such as single-cell analyses, high-resolution genome-wide chromatin assays and more efficient reprogramming systems have been used to challenge and refine our understanding of the reprogramming process. Here, we will outline novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying iPSC formation, focusing on how the core reprogramming factors OCT4, KLF4, SOX2 and MYC (OKSM) drive changes in gene expression, chromatin state and 3D genome topology. In addition, we will discuss unexpected consequences of reprogramming factor expression in in vitro and in vivo systems that may point towards new applications of iPSC technology.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29925040      PMCID: PMC6252123          DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2018.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev        ISSN: 0959-437X            Impact factor:   5.578


  84 in total

1.  H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs.

Authors:  Jiekai Chen; He Liu; Jing Liu; Jing Qi; Bei Wei; Jiaqi Yang; Hanquan Liang; You Chen; Jing Chen; Yaran Wu; Lin Guo; Jieying Zhu; Xiangjie Zhao; Tianran Peng; Yixin Zhang; Shen Chen; Xuejia Li; Dongwei Li; Tao Wang; Duanqing Pei
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Induction of Pluripotency in Astrocytes through a Neural Stem Cell-like State.

Authors:  May Nakajima-Koyama; Joonseong Lee; Sho Ohta; Takuya Yamamoto; Eisuke Nishida
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  OCT4 and SOX2 Work as Transcriptional Activators in Reprogramming Human Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Santosh Narayan; Gene Bryant; Shivangi Shah; Georgina Berrozpe; Mark Ptashne
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Local Genome Topology Can Exhibit an Incompletely Rewired 3D-Folding State during Somatic Cell Reprogramming.

Authors:  Jonathan A Beagan; Thomas G Gilgenast; Jesi Kim; Zachary Plona; Heidi K Norton; Gui Hu; Sarah C Hsu; Emily J Shields; Xiaowen Lyu; Effie Apostolou; Konrad Hochedlinger; Victor G Corces; Job Dekker; Jennifer E Phillips-Cremins
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Integrative Analyses of Human Reprogramming Reveal Dynamic Nature of Induced Pluripotency.

Authors:  Davide Cacchiarelli; Cole Trapnell; Michael J Ziller; Magali Soumillon; Marcella Cesana; Rahul Karnik; Julie Donaghey; Zachary D Smith; Sutheera Ratanasirintrawoot; Xiaolan Zhang; Shannan J Ho Sui; Zhaoting Wu; Veronika Akopian; Casey A Gifford; John Doench; John L Rinn; George Q Daley; Alexander Meissner; Eric S Lander; Tarjei S Mikkelsen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Derivation of Pluripotent Stem Cells with In Vivo Embryonic and Extraembryonic Potency.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Bei Liu; Jun Xu; Jinlin Wang; Jun Wu; Cheng Shi; Yaxing Xu; Jiebin Dong; Chengyan Wang; Weifeng Lai; Jialiang Zhu; Liang Xiong; Dicong Zhu; Xiang Li; Weifeng Yang; Takayoshi Yamauchi; Atsushi Sugawara; Zhongwei Li; Fangyuan Sun; Xiangyun Li; Chen Li; Aibin He; Yaqin Du; Ting Wang; Chaoran Zhao; Haibo Li; Xiaochun Chi; Hongquan Zhang; Yifang Liu; Cheng Li; Shuguang Duo; Ming Yin; Huan Shen; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte; Hongkui Deng
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Cooperative Binding of Transcription Factors Orchestrates Reprogramming.

Authors:  Constantinos Chronis; Petko Fiziev; Bernadett Papp; Stefan Butz; Giancarlo Bonora; Shan Sabri; Jason Ernst; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The developmental potential of iPSCs is greatly influenced by reprogramming factor selection.

Authors:  Yosef Buganim; Styliani Markoulaki; Niek van Wietmarschen; Heather Hoke; Tao Wu; Kibibi Ganz; Batool Akhtar-Zaidi; Yupeng He; Brian J Abraham; David Porubsky; Elisabeth Kulenkampff; Dina A Faddah; Linyu Shi; Qing Gao; Sovan Sarkar; Malkiel Cohen; Johanna Goldmann; Joseph R Nery; Matthew D Schultz; Joseph R Ecker; Andrew Xiao; Richard A Young; Peter M Lansdorp; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 24.633

9.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Bernardo Pando; Jeroen van Zon; Christopher J Lengner; Menno P Creyghton; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Establishment of mouse expanded potential stem cells.

Authors:  Jian Yang; David J Ryan; Wei Wang; Jason Cheuk-Ho Tsang; Guocheng Lan; Hideki Masaki; Xuefei Gao; Liliana Antunes; Yong Yu; Zhexin Zhu; Juexuan Wang; Aleksandra A Kolodziejczyk; Lia S Campos; Cui Wang; Fengtang Yang; Zhen Zhong; Beiyuan Fu; Melanie A Eckersley-Maslin; Michael Woods; Yosuke Tanaka; Xi Chen; Adam C Wilkinson; James Bussell; Jacqui White; Ramiro Ramirez-Solis; Wolf Reik; Berthold Göttgens; Sarah A Teichmann; Patrick P L Tam; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Xiangang Zou; Liming Lu; Pentao Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Modeling Leukemia with Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Eirini P Papapetrou
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Identification of microRNAs related with neural germ layer lineage-specific progenitors during reprogramming.

Authors:  Ruizhen Sun; Tiantian Gong; Hui Liu; Jingling Shen; Bin Wu; Qi Jiang; Qi Wang; Yue Zhang; Lian Duan; Jing Hu; Qiuming Li; Lei Lei; Zhiyan Shan
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  KLF4 is involved in the organization and regulation of pluripotency-associated three-dimensional enhancer networks.

Authors:  Dafne Campigli Di Giammartino; Andreas Kloetgen; Alexander Polyzos; Yiyuan Liu; Daleum Kim; Dylan Murphy; Abderhman Abuhashem; Paola Cavaliere; Boaz Aronson; Veevek Shah; Noah Dephoure; Matthias Stadtfeld; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Effie Apostolou
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  ADAR1-Dependent RNA Editing Promotes MET and iPSC Reprogramming by Alleviating ER Stress.

Authors:  Diana Guallar; Alejandro Fuentes-Iglesias; Yara Souto; Cristina Ameneiro; Oscar Freire-Agulleiro; Jose Angel Pardavila; Adriana Escudero; Vera Garcia-Outeiral; Tiago Moreira; Carmen Saenz; Heng Xiong; Dongbing Liu; Shidi Xiao; Yong Hou; Kui Wu; Daniel Torrecilla; Jochen C Hartner; Miguel G Blanco; Leo J Lee; Miguel López; Carl R Walkley; Jianlong Wang; Miguel Fidalgo
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Identification of a dynamic gene regulatory network required for pluripotency factor-induced reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts and hepatocytes.

Authors:  Maria Papathanasiou; Stefanos A Tsiftsoglou; Alexander P Polyzos; Deppie Papadopoulou; Dimitrios Valakos; Eleftheria Klagkou; Panagiota Karagianni; Maria Pliatska; Iannis Talianidis; Marios Agelopoulos; Dimitris Thanos
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Detecting and Modulating ER Stress to Improve Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Alejandro Fuentes-Iglesias; Cristina Ameneiro; Diana Guallar; Miguel Fidalgo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 7.  High Throughput and Highly Controllable Methods for In Vitro Intracellular Delivery.

Authors:  Justin Brooks; Grayson Minnick; Prithvijit Mukherjee; Arian Jaberi; Lingqian Chang; Horacio D Espinosa; Ruiguo Yang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 13.281

8.  TFAP2C facilitates somatic cell reprogramming by inhibiting c-Myc-dependent apoptosis and promoting mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Shuang Chen; Qingyuan Jiang; Jie Deng; Fuyi Cheng; Yi Lin; Lin Cheng; Yixin Ye; Xiaolei Chen; Yunqi Yao; Xiaomei Zhang; Gang Shi; Lei Dai; Xiaolan Su; Yong Peng; Hongxin Deng
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 8.469

9.  WDR5, BRCA1, and BARD1 Co-regulate the DNA Damage Response and Modulate the Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition during Early Reprogramming.

Authors:  Georgina Peñalosa-Ruiz; Vicky Bousgouni; Jan P Gerlach; Susan Waarlo; Joris V van de Ven; Tim E Veenstra; José C R Silva; Simon J van Heeringen; Chris Bakal; Klaas W Mulder; Gert Jan C Veenstra
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 7.765

10.  Oplr16 serves as a novel chromatin factor to control stem cell fate by modulating pluripotency-specific chromosomal looping and TET2-mediated DNA demethylation.

Authors:  Lin Jia; Yichen Wang; Cong Wang; Zhonghua Du; Shilin Zhang; Xue Wen; Lei Zhou; Hui Li; Huiling Chen; Dan Li; Songling Zhang; Wei Li; Wei Xu; Andrew R Hoffman; Jiuwei Cui; Ji-Fan Hu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.