Literature DB >> 28762545

Epigenetic risk score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.

Leander Van Neste1, Jack Groskopf2, William E Grizzle3, George W Adams4, Mark S DeGuenther4, Peter N Kolettis3, James E Bryant3, Gary P Kearney5, Michael C Kearney5, Wim Van Criekinge6, Sandra M Gaston7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection of aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) remains crucial for effective treatment of patients. However, PCa screening remains controversial due to a high rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. To better reconcile both objectives, more effective methods for assessing disease severity at the time of diagnosis are needed.
METHODS: The relationship between DNA-methylation and high-grade PCa was examined in a cohort of 102 prospectively enrolled men who received standard 12-core prostate biopsies. EpiScore, an algorithm that quantifies the relative DNA methylation intensities of GSTP1, RASSF1, and APC in prostate biopsy tissue, was evaluated as a method to compensate for biopsy under-sampling and improve risk stratification at the time of diagnosis.
RESULTS: DNA-methylation intensities of GSTP1, RASSF1, and APC were higher in biopsy cores from men diagnosed with GS ≥ 7 cancer compared to men with diagnosed GS 6 disease. This was confirmed by EpiScore, which was significantly higher for subjects with high-grade biopsies and higher NCCN risk categories (both P < 0.001). In patients diagnosed with GS ≥ 7, increased levels of DNA-methylation were present, not only in the high-grade biopsy cores, but also in other cores with no or low-grade disease (P < 0.001). By combining EpiScore with traditional clinical risk factors into a logistic regression model, the prediction of high GS reached an AUC of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.73-0.91) with EpiScore, DRE, and atypical histological findings as most important contributors.
CONCLUSIONS: In men diagnosed with PCa, DNA-methylation profiling can detect under-sampled high-risk PCa in prostate biopsy specimens through a field effect. Predictive accuracy increased when EpiScore was combined with other clinical risk factors. These results suggest that EpiScore could aid in the detection of occult high-grade disease at the time of diagnosis, thereby improving the selection of candidates for Active Surveillance.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason grade; epigenetic; logistic regression model; prognosis; prostate cancer; risk score

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28762545     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  6 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the computational and molecular understanding of the prostate cancer cell nucleus.

Authors:  Neil M Carleton; George Lee; Anant Madabhushi; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 2.  Epigenetics in prostate cancer: clinical implications.

Authors:  Vincenza Conteduca; Judy Hess; Yasutaka Yamada; Sheng-Yu Ku; Himisha Beltran
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-07

3.  Nitrocellulose tissue prints: an innovative approach to preparing high quality DNA and RNA from prostate biopsies without compromising the cores for pathology diagnosis.

Authors:  Sandra M Gaston; William E Grizzle; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Gary P Kearney
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-09

Review 4.  Epigenetic regulation of prostate cancer: the theories and the clinical implications.

Authors:  Yiji Liao; Kexin Xu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Epigenome-wide association study reveals CpG sites related to COG of neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Hao Zhao; Xiaojun Zhou; Hu Sun; Dongyun Zhao; Hongfei Liu; Bin Huang; Xingang Li; Yinghao Gu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Construction of a risk prediction model using m6A RNA methylation regulators in prostate cancer: comprehensive bioinformatic analysis and histological validation.

Authors:  Yongjun Quan; Xiaodong Zhang; Hao Ping
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.722

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.