OBJECTIVES: : To evaluate the geometric distortion of tilting of mandibular third molars with respect to second molars on panoramic reconstruction. METHODS: : Cone-beam CT (CBCT) reconstructions of 160 third molars, obtained due to an indication of risk of inferior alveolar nerve damage during surgery, were used. CBCT-reconstructed panoramic images were used as bi-dimensional (2D) images, to avoid distortions other than geometric distortions. The angle between the second and the third molar was measured in 2D and three-dimensional (3D) images. Student's t-test was used to assess the null-hypothesis of no difference between 2D and 3D measurements. RESULTS: : A significant mean difference (-2.3° ± 6.3°) between 2D and 3D measurements was found, with an absolute error of 3.6° ± 5.7° and a relative error of 10%. These findings comprehensively explain the geometric distortion on panoramic radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: : Although a widely used and undoubtedly useful tool for diagnosis and surgical planning of mandibular third molar extractions, panoramic reconstruction are biased from geometric distortion that may influence surgical planning.
OBJECTIVES: : To evaluate the geometric distortion of tilting of mandibular third molars with respect to second molars on panoramic reconstruction. METHODS: : Cone-beam CT (CBCT) reconstructions of 160 third molars, obtained due to an indication of risk of inferior alveolar nerve damage during surgery, were used. CBCT-reconstructed panoramic images were used as bi-dimensional (2D) images, to avoid distortions other than geometric distortions. The angle between the second and the third molar was measured in 2D and three-dimensional (3D) images. Student's t-test was used to assess the null-hypothesis of no difference between 2D and 3D measurements. RESULTS: : A significant mean difference (-2.3° ± 6.3°) between 2D and 3D measurements was found, with an absolute error of 3.6° ± 5.7° and a relative error of 10%. These findings comprehensively explain the geometric distortion on panoramic radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: : Although a widely used and undoubtedly useful tool for diagnosis and surgical planning of mandibular third molar extractions, panoramic reconstruction are biased from geometric distortion that may influence surgical planning.