R Marmulla1, R Wörtche, J Mühling, S Hassfeld. 1. Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Ruediger_Marmulla@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the geometric accuracy of digital volume tomograms to assess their usability for implant planning. METHODS: A measuring object with 216 measuring points, whose geometry is exactly known, is X-rayed with a NewTom 9000 cone beam scanner; thereafter the geometry of the volume tomogram of the object is compared with the original body. RESULTS: Considering all three coordinate axes, geometric mean deviations of 0.13 +/- 0.09 mm with a maximum deviation of 0.3 mm were determined. These geometric deviations are below the resolution power of the volume tomograph. CONCLUSION: The digital volume tomographies of NewTom 9000 present images which are geometrically correct and, from a geometrical point of view, suitable for three-dimensional implant planning.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the geometric accuracy of digital volume tomograms to assess their usability for implant planning. METHODS: A measuring object with 216 measuring points, whose geometry is exactly known, is X-rayed with a NewTom 9000 cone beam scanner; thereafter the geometry of the volume tomogram of the object is compared with the original body. RESULTS: Considering all three coordinate axes, geometric mean deviations of 0.13 +/- 0.09 mm with a maximum deviation of 0.3 mm were determined. These geometric deviations are below the resolution power of the volume tomograph. CONCLUSION: The digital volume tomographies of NewTom 9000 present images which are geometrically correct and, from a geometrical point of view, suitable for three-dimensional implant planning.
Authors: Paul W Poeschl; Nina Schmidt; Godoberto Guevara-Rojas; Rudolf Seemann; Rolf Ewers; Harald T Zipko; Kurt Schicho Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Bassant Mowafey; Elke Van de Casteele; Jilan M Youssef; Ahmed R Zaher; Hany Omar; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs Journal: J Forensic Odontostomatol Date: 2015-12-01
Authors: Madhu K Nair; Umadevi P Nair; Ali Seyedain; Robert Gassner; Nicholas Piesco; Mark Mooney; Sudhakar Ganta; Sudha Agarwal Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2006-08-02
Authors: John B Ludlow; William Stewart Laster; Meit See; L'Tanya J Bailey; H Garland Hershey Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2006-08-04
Authors: Francine Kühl Panzarella; J L C Junqueira; L B Oliveira; N S de Araújo; C Costa Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Dan Grauer; Lucia S H Cevidanes; Martin A Styner; Inam Heulfe; Eric T Harmon; Hongtu Zhu; William R Proffit Journal: Angle Orthod Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.079