Literature DB >> 29916134

A systematic review of Appropriate Use Criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the United States?

Robert N Kerley1, Siun O'Flynn2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) were developed by the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) to provide guidance for referring physicians in response to growing concerns about unnecessary transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) requests. Very few studies have assessed how medical centers overseas perform against AUC. Evidence is now emerging that inappropriate referral rates in Europe are similar to those reported in the US.
OBJECTIVE: This study systematically reviewed published evidence to identify (1) whether the 2011 AUC are applicable to medical centers outside the US (2) the level of adherence to the AUC across multiple centers, (3) the main factors which cause deviation from AUC, (4) any changes in referral rates since the publication of AUC, and (5) any factors and/or intervention strategies which promote adherence to AUC. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Electronic databases were systematically searched for papers related to AUC and cardiac imaging. Following screening and application of eligibility criteria, data was extracted from ten reports involving 8561 TTE studies. Classification rates were 99.5 and 98% for US studies and studies outside the US respectively. Overall, 7119 TTE studies were classified as appropriate (83.1%) of which 3724 were US referrals (84.7%) and 3395 originated outside the US (81.5%). Six of the included studies independently observed significantly more appropriate referrals among inpatients compared to outpatients (p < 0.001). US centers observed no significant difference in appropriate referral rates between physician specialties while one UK study showed cardiac surgeons ordered inappropriate TTEs more frequently than other specialties (p < 0.05). This review found no obvious trend in appropriate referral rates between 2012 and 2015 indicating no temporal change in physician ordering patterns. Only one educational interventional study met the author's criteria which showed that while intervention was effective during its implantation (26% reduction in TTEs ordered per day), TTE referral rates regressed to pre-intervention levels overtime.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the American guideline AUC are applicable to centers outside the US and their implementation across five international centers suggest almost 1 in 5 scans could be avoided.

Keywords:  Appropriate Use Criteria; Transthoracic echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29916134     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1843-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  19 in total

1.  Medicare services provided by cardiologists in the United States: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Bruce W Andrus; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-01-10

2.  Appropriateness of use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the USA?

Authors:  Maria-Magdalena Gurzun; Adrian Ionescu
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Comparison of the 2007 and 2011 appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography in various clinical settings.

Authors:  R Sacha Bhatia; Dana M Carne; Michael H Picard; Rory B Weiner
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Does the revised appropriate use criteria for echocardiography represent an improvement over the initial criteria? A comparison between the 2011 and the 2007 appropriateness use criteria for echocardiography.

Authors:  Puja B Parikh; John Asheld; Smadar Kort
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Temporal changes in appropriateness of cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo Fonseca; Kazuaki Negishi; Petr Otahal; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Comparison of the updated 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography to the original criteria for transthoracic, transesophageal, and stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Mansour; Rabia R Razi; Nicole M Bhave; R Parker Ward
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Estimation of the possible economic effects of a sequential testing strategy with NT-proBNP before echocardiography in primary care.

Authors:  Banafsheh Seyyed Khezri; Johanna Helmersson-Karlqvist; Anders Larsson
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.138

8.  Educational intervention to reduce inappropriate transthoracic echocardiograms: the need for sustained intervention.

Authors:  Rajan Sacha Bhatia; David M Dudzinski; Creagh E Milford; Michael H Picard; Rory B Weiner
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.724

9.  The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.

Authors:  Thomas P Koshy; Anand Rohatgi; Sandeep R Das; Angela L Price; Andres deLuna; Nicholas Reimold; Kyle Willett; Sharon C Reimold; Susan A Matulevicius
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Application of 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography appropriateness use criteria in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography in a community setting.

Authors:  Piercarlo Ballo; Fabrizio Bandini; Irene Capecchi; Leandro Chiodi; Giuseppe Ferro; Alberto Fortini; Gabriele Giuliani; Giancarlo Landini; Raffaele Laureano; Massimo Milli; Gabriele Nenci; Francesco Pizzarelli; Giovanni Maria Santoro; Pasquale Vannelli; Carlo Cappelletti; Alfredo Zuppiroli
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 5.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.