Literature DB >> 25614328

The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.

Thomas P Koshy1, Anand Rohatgi, Sandeep R Das, Angela L Price, Andres deLuna, Nicholas Reimold, Kyle Willett, Sharon C Reimold, Susan A Matulevicius.   

Abstract

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) were developed to promote high-value care. We describe the prevalence of clinically significant abnormal TTE findings overall and in subgroups defined by appropriate and inappropriate AUC, and their association with clinical impact. 548 consecutive TTEs at an academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed for AUC, clinical impact, and TTE abnormalities. TTE reports within 1 year of the index TTE were reviewed to determine if abnormalities were new, unchanged, or resolved. Clinical impact was classified into no change, active change, or continuation of care. 91% of TTEs were appropriate, 5% were inappropriate, and 4% were uncertain by AUC. 46% of all TTEs and 57% of first-time TTEs had no significant TTE abnormalities. Appropriate TTEs had a higher prevalence of ≥1 TTE abnormality than inappropriate TTEs (56 vs. 33%, p = 0.029). Among repeat TTEs, 72 % had ≥1 TTE abnormality, however only 25% had a new abnormality. The prevalence of a new abnormality was similar between inappropriate and appropriate repeat TTEs (25 vs. 26%, p = 1.0). The prevalence of ≥1 abnormality was similar between TTEs that resulted in active change and no change in care (70 vs. 64%, p = 0.06). Although most TTEs were appropriate as defined by AUC, the majority had no significant abnormalities. Although most TTEs were appropriate by AUC, >50% of all TTEs and 25% of repeat TTEs had no significant abnormalities. Appropriate TTEs had a higher prevalence of abnormalities, however the prevalence of abnormalities was similar between TTEs that resulted in active change versus no change in care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25614328     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0582-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  24 in total

1.  Medicare services provided by cardiologists in the United States: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Bruce W Andrus; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-01-10

2.  American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations.

Authors:  Michael H Picard; David Adams; S Michelle Bierig; John M Dent; Pamela S Douglas; Linda D Gillam; Andrew M Keller; David J Malenka; Frederick A Masoudi; Marti McCulloch; Patricia A Pellikka; Priscilla J Peters; Raymond F Stainback; G Monet Strachan; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Appropriateness criteria are an imprecise measure for repeat echocardiograms.

Authors:  Abhijit Ghatak; Raja Pullatt; Stuart Vyse; David I Silverman
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 1.724

4.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 5.  ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Bijoy Khandheria; Raymond F Stainback; Neil J Weissman; Ralph G Brindis; Manesh R Patel; Bijoy Khandheria; Joseph S Alpert; David Fitzgerald; Paul Heidenreich; Edward T Martin; Joseph V Messer; Alan B Miller; Michael H Picard; Paolo Raggi; Kim D Reed; John S Rumsfeld; Anthony E Steimle; Russ Tonkovic; Krishnaswami Vijayaraghavan; Neil J Weissman; Susan Bok Yeon; Ralph G Brindis; Pamela S Douglas; Robert C Hendel; Manesh R Patel; Eric Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Arturo Evangelista; Brian P Griffin; Bernard Iung; Catherine M Otto; Patricia A Pellikka; Miguel Quiñones
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Comparison of the updated 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography to the original criteria for transthoracic, transesophageal, and stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Mansour; Rabia R Razi; Nicole M Bhave; R Parker Ward
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Appropriate use and clinical impact of transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Susan A Matulevicius; Anand Rohatgi; Sandeep R Das; Angela L Price; Andres DeLuna; Sharon C Reimold
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Repeat testing among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Kevin J Hayes; Carol Frost
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-10

10.  Application of 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography appropriateness use criteria in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography in a community setting.

Authors:  Piercarlo Ballo; Fabrizio Bandini; Irene Capecchi; Leandro Chiodi; Giuseppe Ferro; Alberto Fortini; Gabriele Giuliani; Giancarlo Landini; Raffaele Laureano; Massimo Milli; Gabriele Nenci; Francesco Pizzarelli; Giovanni Maria Santoro; Pasquale Vannelli; Carlo Cappelletti; Alfredo Zuppiroli
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  3 in total

1.  A systematic review of Appropriate Use Criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the United States?

Authors:  Robert N Kerley; Siun O'Flynn
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography: Evolving Applications in the Era of Value-Based Healthcare.

Authors:  Amita Singh; R Parker Ward
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Low prevalence of relevant findings in inappropriate echocardiograms and discordant perceptions between cardiologists and patients.

Authors:  J R Lopes; A C Oliveira; V G Rios; L C L Correia
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.590

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.