Literature DB >> 22898245

Comparison of the 2007 and 2011 appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography in various clinical settings.

R Sacha Bhatia1, Dana M Carne, Michael H Picard, Rory B Weiner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2007 Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for echocardiography was revised in 2011 to cover a wider range of scenarios of use. Previous studies of the 2007 AUC found a relatively large number of unclassified transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review comparing TTE usage in three clinical environments: academic inpatient, academic outpatient, and community outpatient. We assessed the TTE ordering behavior using both the 2007 and 2011 AUC.
RESULTS: We reviewed 150 consecutive TTEs performed in 2011 in each of the three practice settings (total 450). Using the 2007 AUC, 347 TTEs (77%) were classifiable, and, using the 2011 AUC, 441 TTEs (98%) were classifiable (P < .001). Of the classified studies, the percentage of appropriate TTEs using the 2007 AUC was 83% and using the 2011 AUC was 71% (P < .001). Using the 2007 and 2011 AUC, the percentage of inappropriate TTEs was 17% and 22% (P = .14), and the percentage of uncertain TTEs was 0% and 7% (P < .001), respectively. The rate of inappropriate studies was greatest in the outpatient academic medical center (30%), followed by the outpatient community health center (21%) and the inpatient academic medical center (14%; P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: The 2011 AUC classified a significantly greater proportion of TTEs than the 2007 AUC across a variety of practice settings. The rate of appropriate TTEs was lower using the 2011 AUC, and the appropriateness ratings varied by clinical setting. These findings suggest that the expanded AUC offer an opportunity for improvement in TTE usage.
Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898245     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  16 in total

1.  An Automated System for Categorizing Transthoracic Echocardiography Indications According to the Echocardiography Appropriate Use Criteria.

Authors:  Aaron S Eisman; Rory B Weiner; Elizabeth S Chen; Paul C Stey; Rishi K Wadhera; Aaron P Kithcart; Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  A systematic review of Appropriate Use Criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the United States?

Authors:  Robert N Kerley; Siun O'Flynn
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Novel wireless devices for cardiac monitoring.

Authors:  Joseph A Walsh; Eric J Topol; Steven R Steinhubl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Can hospital rounds with pocket ultrasound by cardiologists reduce standard echocardiography?

Authors:  Hashim A Khan; Nathan E Wineinger; Poulina Q Uddin; Hirsch S Mehta; David S Rubenson; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Effects of an Electronic Medical Record Intervention on Appropriateness of Transthoracic Echocardiograms: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Weihan Chen; David T Saxon; Michael P Henry; John R Herald; Rob Holleman; Debbie Zawol; Stacy Sivils; Mohamad A Kenaan; Theodore J Kolias; Hitinder S Gurm; Nicole M Bhave
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 6.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography: Evolving Applications in the Era of Value-Based Healthcare.

Authors:  Amita Singh; R Parker Ward
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.

Authors:  Thomas P Koshy; Anand Rohatgi; Sandeep R Das; Angela L Price; Andres deLuna; Nicholas Reimold; Kyle Willett; Sharon C Reimold; Susan A Matulevicius
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Hospital variation in the use of noninvasive cardiac imaging and its association with downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes.

Authors:  Kyan C Safavi; Shu-Xia Li; Kumar Dharmarajan; Arjun K Venkatesh; Kelly M Strait; Haiqun Lin; Timothy J Lowe; Reza Fazel; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Limitations of free-form-text diagnostic requisitions as a tool for evaluating adherence to appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Behnam Banihashemi; Kasra Maftoon; Benjamin J W Chow; Jordan Bernick; George A Wells; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Assessment of inpatient multimodal cardiac imaging appropriateness at large academic medical centers.

Authors:  Andrew Remfry; Howard Abrams; David M Dudzinski; Rory B Weiner; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.