| Literature DB >> 29914212 |
Xingchang Lu1, Chen Liu2, Zhimin Wang3, Junyi Yang4, Mengjing Xu5, Jun Dong6, Ping Wang7, Jiangjiang Gu8, Feifei Cao9.
Abstract
On⁻off⁻on fluorescent sensors based on emerging carbon nanoparticles (Entities:
Keywords: Fe(III); biothiols; nitrogen-doped carbon nanoparticles; on–off–on fluorescent sensors; silkworm excrement
Year: 2018 PMID: 29914212 PMCID: PMC6027355 DOI: 10.3390/nano8060443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1A schematic illustration of the formation of nitrogen-doped CNPs (N-CNPs) from silkworm excrement, and the fluorescence “on–off–on” detection of Fe(III) and biothiols.
Figure 2Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image (a); the particle size distribution histogram (b); X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (c); and fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum (d) of N-CNPs.
Figure 3X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) full survey (a); C 1s (b); N 1s (c) and O 1s (d) spectra of N-CNPs. Black line: raw, navy line: background, other lines: fitting.
Figure 4Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectrum (a) and photoluminescent (PL) emission spectra at different excitation wavelengths (b) of N-CNPs. Inset: photographs of N-CNPs in water under daylight and UV irradiation.
Figure 5(a) Selectivity of N-CNPs with different ions at the same concentration (500 μM); (b) The linear relationship between F0/F and Fe(III) concentration. F and F0 were the PL intensities (424 nm) of N-CNPs at 340 nm excitation in the presence and absence of ions, respectively.
Figure 6(a) Selectivity of N-CNPs/Fe(III) to different biological molecules at the same concentration (1 mM); (b) The linear relationship between (F’/F’0) and the square root of glutathione (GSH) concentration. F’ and F’0 were the PL intensities (424 nm) of N-CNPs/Fe(III) at 340 nm excitation in the absence and presence of biological molecules, respectively.
Nitrogen-doped CNPs (N-CNPs) for the detection of glutathione (GSH) in fetal calf serum samples.
| Added GSH (μM) | Found GSH (μM) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4.35 | 108.7 | 1.50 |
| 50 | 51.96 | 103.9 | 2.14 |
| 100 | 102.4 | 102.4 | 2.43 |