| Literature DB >> 36133414 |
Rossella Santonocito1, Manuelamaria Intravaia1, Ivana Maria Caruso1, Andrea Pappalardo1,2, Giuseppe Trusso Sfrazzetto1,2, Nunzio Tuccitto1,3.
Abstract
Sensing is one of the most important fields in which chemists, engineers and other scientists are involved to realize sensoristic devices that can detect different analytes, both chemicals and biologicals. In this context, fluorescence sensing paves the way for the realization of smart sensoristic devices due to the possibility to detect the target analyte via a change in colour or emission. Recently (since 2006), carbon nanoparticles, which are a "new class" of nanostructures based on carbon atoms, have been widely used in sensing applications due to their intriguing optical properties. The scientific literature on this topic started from 2006 and a progressive increase in the corresponding number of publications has been observed. This review summarises the application of carbon nanoparticles in the sensing field, focusing on chemical and ion sensing. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36133414 PMCID: PMC9418512 DOI: 10.1039/d2na00080f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Adv ISSN: 2516-0230
Fig. 1(a) Classification of carbon nanostructures by their dimensionality, (b) one-pot synthesis of CNPs and (c) covalent functionalization of the external shell.
Summary of chemical sensing by CNPs
| Sensing | Carbon source | Mechanism of fluorescence detection | Linearity | LOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Acrylic acid, ethylenediamine | FRET | pH 4.5–6 |
| |
| Citric acid, aniline | Quenching | pH 3.47–5.10 |
| ||
| 5-Amino salicylic acid | Quenching | pH 5.2–6.8 |
| ||
| Citric acid | Quenching | pH 6–10 |
| ||
| N-based compounds | Acetic acid | FRET | 3 ppm |
| |
| Food grade honey | Enhancement | 4.9–38 nM | 2.3 nM |
| |
| H2O2 | Carbohydrates | Enhancement | 20–20.000 mM | 5 μM |
|
| Citric acid, ethylenediamine | PET | 0–2 mM | 84 nM |
| |
| Glucosamide hydrochloride | Enhancement | 0.1–10 mM | 87 nM |
| |
| VOC | pCN-TPA | ICT |
| ||
| Explosives | Ammonium citrate | FRET | 0–20 mM | 0.25 mM |
|
| Activated carbon | Quenching | 10–600 mM | 2 ppm |
| |
| Carbon nanopowder | Quenching – CT |
| |||
| S-based compounds | Histidine | Quenching | 0–2 mM | 0.036 μM |
|
| Histidine and citrate | FRET | 0–50 mM | 18 nM |
| |
| Tris | FRET | 1–1900 nM | 0.4 nM |
| |
| Silkworm droppings | Enhancement | 1–1000 μM | 0.13 μM |
| |
| Citric acid, cysteine | Enhancement | 1–10 mM | 1 mM |
| |
| Asparagine | Enhancement | 0.01–0.9 mM | 0.01 mM |
| |
| Glucose | CCl4, ethylenediamine | n.d. | 40 μM to 20 mM | 40 μM |
|
| Phenylboronic acid | Quenching | 9–900 μM | 1.5 mM |
| |
| Citric acid, ethylenediamine | Enhancement | 2.0–400 μM | 0.67 μM |
| |
| Lignite | Quenching | 1–10 mM | 0.125 mM |
| |
| Drugs | Ascorbic acid | Quenching | 0.5–3 μM (blue channel) 0.1–3 μM (yellow channel) | 0.037 mM |
|
| Honey | Quenching | 100 nm to 1000 mM | 6 nM |
| |
|
| Enhancement | 0.005–0.16 μM | 2 nM |
| |
| Glucose | Enhancement | 0.8–80 μM | 0.55 μM |
| |
| Riboflavin | Enhancement | 0–100 mg mL−1 | 250 ng mL−1 |
| |
| Eucalyptus twigs, ammonium chloride | Quenching | 0.25–2 μM, | 200 nM |
| |
| Citric acid | Quenching | 1–100 nM | 0.39 ppt |
| |
| FRET | 0–40 mM | 0.41 μM |
| ||
| Citric acid | Quenching | 0–1.5 mg mL−1 | 0.1 mg mL−1 |
| |
| Citric acid | Quenching | 0–1 mM | 57 nM |
| |
| Citric acid, ammonia sulphate | Quenching | 0.05–4 mM | 0.003 mM |
| |
| Citric acid, melamine | Enhancement | 0.005–0.1 mg L−1 | 2.32 mg L−1 |
|
Fig. 2Schematic representation of pH sensing by FRET mechanism (reproduced with permission from Nanotechnology, 2013, 24, 365101, Copyright 2013, IOP Science).
Fig. 3(a) Fluorescence spectra at different pH values, (b) plot of the emissions during titration, (c) liner response of the CNPs to pH value, and (d) recovery test (adapted with permission from Talanta, 2018, 186, 80–87, Copyright 2018, Elsevier).
Fig. 4(a) Schematic representation of the device and (b) emission as a function of pH (reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2021, 4, 9738−9751, Copyright 2021, the American Chemical Society).
Fig. 5Mechanism of H2O2 sensing by fluorescent CNPs functionalized with 2-(diphenylphosphino) ethylamine.
Fig. 6Images of paper sensor strip containing CNPs after exposure to the vapor of solvents taken under a UV lamp (365 nm) (reproduced with permission from RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 83501–83504, Copyright 2016, The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Fig. 7Sensing mechanism of S2− based on CNPs and AuNCs (reproduced with permission from Analyst, 2015, 140, 6711–6719, Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Fig. 8Schematic representation of the fluorescent sensor array for the detection and discrimination of thiols (adapted with permission from Sens. Actuators, B, 2018, 266, 553–560, Copyright 2018, Science Direct).
Fig. 9(a) Redox reaction between CNPs and dopamine, (b) proposed mechanism of dopamine polymerization and (c) color change of CNP solution with different dopamine concentrations after 5 min and 24 h (adapted with permission from Mater. Today Bio, 2021, 12, 100168, Copyright 2021, Elsevier).
Fig. 10Schematic representation of the synthesis of CNPs@MnO2 (reproduced with permission from Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 18845–18853, Copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Fig. 11Representation of CNPs-C2-OH and DMMP chelation mechanism. Bottom: Synthesis of CNPs-C2-OH (reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2020, 3, 8182−8191, Copyright 2020, the American Chemical Society).
Fig. 12(a) Representation of amino acid recognition based on the effect on the CNPs fluorescence coupled with machine learning capabilities. (b) 2D-maps of fluorescence difference after surface functionalization of activated CDs with GLY at various concentrations (reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2021, 4, 6250, Copyright 2021, The American Chemical Society).
Fig. 13TEM images of N-CNPs/AuNPs without (A) and with MET (B). (Reproduced with permission from Spectrochimica Acta, Part A, 2021, 250, 119384, Copyright 2021, Elsevier).
Fig. 14Schematic representation of Hg2+ sensing mechanism by CNPs based on conformational change of DNA strand.
Summary of ion sensing by CNPs
| Sensing | Carbon source | Mechanism of fluorescence detection | Linearity | LOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg | Candle soot | Enhancement | 10–250 nM | 10 nM |
|
| Pomelo peel | Quenching | 5–10 nM | 0.23 nM |
| |
| 0.5–40 μM | |||||
| Flour | Quenching | 0.5–10 nM | 0.5 nM |
| |
| Sweet potatoes | Quenching | n.d. | 1 nM |
| |
| Melamine, trisodium citrate dihydrate | Quenching | 0–6 mM | 42 nM |
| |
| Coconut milk | Quenching | 30–50 nM | 16.5 nM |
| |
| Citric acid, (NH4)3PO4 | Quenching | 6 nM to 12 mM | 2.3 nM |
| |
| Candle soot | Quenching | 160–2000 nM | 80 nM |
| |
| Corn bract | Quenching | 0–40 μM | 9 nM |
| |
| Citric acid, dimethylglyoxime | FRET | 0.5–500 nM | 0.1 nM |
| |
| Glucose, dicyandiamide | Quenching | 50 nM |
| ||
| Ag | Carbon soot | Enhancement | 500 pM |
| |
| Lactose | Quenching | 385.8 nM |
| ||
|
| Quenching | 12.3–61.9 mM | 5.17 mM |
| |
| Citric acid, ethylendiamine | Quenching | 0.1–265 mM | 50 nM |
| |
| Mn | Diesel soot | Quenching | <10 mM |
| |
| Cr | Diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid | Quenching | 0.5–160 mM | 0.15 mM |
|
| Ammonium citrate | Quenching | 0.01 μM |
| ||
| [PAVIm+][Br−] | Quenching | 0.05 and 10 μM | 15 nM |
| |
| Benzoxazine | Quenching | 0.58 mM |
| ||
|
| Enhancement | 120 nM–200 mM | 37 nM |
| |
| Cu | Graphite rods | Quenching | 0–50 mM | 1 mM |
|
| Grass | Quenching | 1 nM |
| ||
| Lemon extract and | Quenching | 0.05–15 μM | 0.047 μM |
| |
| Waste polyolefins | Quenching | 1–8 μM | 6.33 nM |
| |
| Sodium citrate, glutathione | Enhancement | < 1 mM | 4.81 nM |
| |
| Citric acid, ethylenediamine | Enhancement | 0.025 to 4 μM | 13 nM |
| |
| Poly-thiophene carboxylic acid | Quenching | < 30 mM | 0.44 mM |
| |
| Human fingernails | Quenching | < 1 nM |
| ||
| Fe | Dopamine | Quenching | < 20 mM | 0.32 mM |
|
| Alginate | Quenching | < 25 mM | 1.06 mM |
| |
| Cyclic oligosaccharide | Quenching | 16–166 mM | 6.05 mM |
| |
| Citric acid, Tris | Quenching | < 50 mM | 1.3 mM |
| |
| Trypsin, dopamine | Quenching | 0.1 to 500 mM | 30 nM |
| |
| Dopamine, ethylenediamine | Quenching | 50–300 mM | 10.8 mM |
| |
| Cranberry bean | Quenching | 30–600 μM | 9.55 μM |
| |
| Poplar leaves | Quenching | 0–2.5 μM | n.d. |
| |
| Glucose, ethylenediamine | Quenching | < 50 μg mL−1 | 3.3 ng mL−1 |
| |
| Citric acid | Quenching | < 50 mM | 0.172 mM |
| |
| Pb | Bovine serum albumin protein | Quenching | < 6 mM | 5.05 mM |
|
| Spinach extract | Quenching | < 500 mM | 55 nM |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| Orange peel | Quenching | 0.5–1000 μM | 0.25 μM |
| |
| PET bottle waste | Quenching | < 200 nM | 21 nM |
| |
| Al | Flaxseed oil | Quenching | < 35 mM | 0.77 mM |
|
| Au | MWCNTs | Quenching | 0.65–4.37 nM | 0.20 nM |
|
| Halogen | Orange juice | Enhancement | 1–20 μM | 60 nM |
|
| Citric acid, ethylenediamine | Quenching | < 140 μM | 4 ppm |
|
Fig. 15Sensing mechanism of Hg2+ by CNPs containing RhB (reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 21270–21278, Copyright 2014, the American Chemical Society).
Fig. 16(a) Emission spectra and (b) images of CNPs under a UV lamp in the presence of different cations upon excitation at 365 nm (reproduced with permission from J. Lumin., 2016, 173, 243–249, Copyright 2016, Elsevier).
Fig. 17Representation of CNPs for Ag+ sensing via (a) fluorometric and (b) light-scattering (reproduced with permission from Anal. Methods, 2017, 9, 5611–5617, Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Fig. 18Sensing mechanism for Fe3+ and dopamine by CNPs functionalized with catechol.
Fig. 19Schematic representation of fluorescence enhancement and the Fe3+ detection process of the N-CD probe (reproduced with permission of New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 10213–10218, Copyright 2016, The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Fig. 20Image of CNPs derived from cranberry bean in the presence of different cations under Vis excitation (reproduced with permission from ACS Omega, 2019, 4, 15382–15392, Copyright 2019, the American Chemical Society).
Fig. 21Synthesis of N,S,Cl-CNPs and schematic representation of the [Fe(CN)6]4− sensing (reproduced with permission from Food Chem., 2020, 308, 125590, Copyright 2020, Elsevier).
Fig. 22Photos of strips containing CNPs and (a) different metal ions and (b) with different amounts of Pb2+ (reproduced with permission from J. Mater. Chem. B, 2019, 7, 5502, Copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Fig. 23Images of CNP solution for NaClO sensing upon the addition of different concentrations of NaClO (reproduced with permission from Anal. Methods, 2016, 8, 1157–1161, Copyright 2016, The Royal Society of Chemistry).